Cases

594 A.2d 48 (1991) Alan R. KAHN, Barnett Stepak, California Public Employees' Retirement System, Objectors Below, Appellants, v. Joseph SULLIVAN and Alan Brody, Plaintiffs Below, Michael Hammer, Special Administrator of the Estate of Dr. Armand Hammer, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Dr. Ray Irani, Arthur B. Krim, Morrie A. Moss, Aziz D. Syriani, O.C. Davis, Senator Albert Gore, Arthur Groman, Michael A. Hammer, David A. Hentschel, J. Roger

925 F.Supp. 930 (1996) Jacinta SKUBEL, et al. v. Louis SULLIVAN, et al. No. 3:90CV-00279 (EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 14, 1996. *931 *932 Stephen Wizner, Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, Andrew Golub, Susman Godrey, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Lew Golinker, United Cerebral

805 F.2d 682 55 USLW 2270, 6 Fed.R.Serv.3d 155,7 Employee Benefits Ca 2442 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Frank E. FITZSIMMONS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.David DUTCHAK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,andSecretary of Labor, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, etc., et al.,Defendants-Appellees.Chester SULLIVAN, et al., Plaintiffs-App

OPINION OF THE COURT Sullivan, J. This is a declaratory judgment action, which arises in the context of mass asbestos liability exposure on the part of Corning Incorporated, brought by two of its insurers, Mt. McKinley *53Insurance Company and Everest Reinsurance Company1 against Corning and other insurers that similarly is

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

811 F.Supp.2d 910 (2011) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A., et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. No. 08 Civ. 2516. 08 MDL No. 1950. United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 7, 2011. Jeffrey B. Gittleman, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Eugene A. Spector, William G. Caldes, Spector, Roseman &am;

597 F.Supp.2d 211 (2009) Kirk DAHL, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12388-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 12, 2009. George C. Aguilar, Brian J. Robbins, Robbins Umeda LLP, Kristen M. Anderson, Christopher M. Burke, Hal

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge Pending before the Court in this patent infringement action are the following motions: 1. Defendants’ motion for leave to supplement the record to address recently developed facts regarding their motion for clarification of the Court’s construction of “within the telephone network.” (D.I. 498, C.A. No. 10-1067) (D.I. 68, C.A. No. 12-15

714 F.Supp.2d 225 (2010) Kirk DAHL, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12388-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 22, 2010. *226 George C. Aguilar, Robbins Umeda, Kristen M. Anderson, Mary K. Bl

295 S.W.3d 5 (2009) Raymond SOMERS, derivatively on behalf of EGL, INC., and Vivian Golombuski and Platinum PVA Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and Platinum PVA Fund, Appellants, v. James R. CRANE, Milton Carroll, James C. Flagg, Frank J. Hevrdejs, Paul W. Hobby, Michael K. Jhin, Neil E. Kelley, Sherman Wolff, Centerbridge Partners, L.P., The Woodbridge Co. Ltd. and Nominal Defendant EGL, Inc., Appellees. Raym

FINCH, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendants' motion for stay pending appeal.1 The parties presented arguments to this Court on November 3, 1995. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, defendants' motion will be denied. On October 25, 1995, this Court issued an order granting plaintiffs' motion for a p

790 F.Supp.2d 106 (2011) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A. et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to: State of West Virginia ex rel. Darell V. McGraw, Jr., Attorney General v. Bank of America, N.A., et al. Nos. 08 Civ. 2516. 08 MDL No. 1950. United States District Court, S.D. New York. April

655 F.Supp.2d 146 (2009) Kirk DAHL, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12388-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 22, 2009. *147 Arthur L. Shingler, III, Hal Cunningham, Christopher M. Burke, Kr

SL 4000 Conn. LLC v CBRE, Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 04350) SL 4000 Conn. LLC v CBRE, Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 04350 Decided on August 17, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

760 F.Supp.2d 196 (2011) Kirk DAHL, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12388-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 13, 2011. Arthur L. Shingler, III, Hal Cunningham, Scott & Scott LLP, George C. Aguilar, Brian J. Robbins, Rob

905 F.Supp. 248 (1995) Edwin C. CROUCH, James J. Heying, and Jeffrey J. Prosser, Plaintiffs, v. Cornelius B. PRIOR, Jr., Robert A.R. MaClennan, Andrew F. Lane, Alan Hasselwander, J.B. Ellis, and Henry Wheatley, Defendants. Civ. No. 1995-108-F-STX. District Court, Virgin Islands, D. Saint Croix. October 25, 1995. *249

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS McMAHON, District Judge. In this qui tarn action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., the United States government (“the *326Government”) intervened as a plaintiff against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS McMAHON, District Judge: Plaintiff-relator David M. Kester (“Relator”) filed a sealed qui tam action asserting claims arising under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and related state laws. The Defendants named in the complaint include Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporati

790 F.Supp.2d 125 (2011) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A., et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. No. 08 Civ. 2516. 08 MDL No. 1950. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 28, 2011. *127 Jeffrey B. Gittleman, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Eugene A. Spector, W

742 A.2d 845 (1999) Patrick J. O'MALLEY and Leatha S. O'Malley, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. James R. BORIS, Stephen McConahey, Daniel D. Williams, Stanley Fallis, David Greene, Arthur McGivern, John Sullivan, Janet Reali, Thomas Reedy, Homer J. Livingston, Jr., William Daley, William Springer, William Esrey, C. Michael Viviano, Craig M. Black, Aldo Bonfiglio, Florence Z. Enders, R. G