Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Susan Marie McGrory”
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Lathrop Limited Parternship Ipublic domain
STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT — ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION } In re Lathrop Limited Partnership I } Docket No. 122-7-04 Vtec (Appeal of Rueger, et al.) } (appeal from conditional use approval) } ************************************************************************************************
Bibiji Kaur Puri v. Sopurkh Kaur Khalsapublic domain
OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a dispute over the control of two nonprofit entities associated with the Sikh Dharma religious community. The plaintiffs, the widow and children of the late spiritual leader of the Sikh Dharma faith, brought claims against various individuals and entities alleging several interlocking conspiracies an
Layman v. Laymanpublic domain
84 Md. App. 183 (1990) 578 A.2d 314 WILLIAM T. LAYMAN, II, ET AL. v. ROSALIE ANN LAYMAN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM T. LAYMAN, ET AL. No. 1684, September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. August 31, 1990. As Amended November 8, 1990. Andrew M. Steinberg (Lerman & Steinberg, on the bri
Bibiji Kaur Puri v. Sopurkh Kaur Khalsapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BIBIJI INDERJIT KAUR PURI; No. 13-36024 RANBIR SINGH BHAI; KAMALJIT KAUR KOHLI; KULBIR SINGH D.C. No. PURI, 3:10-cv-01532-MO Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION SOPURKH KAUR KHALSA; PERAIM KAUR KHALSA; SIRI RAM KAUR KHALSA; SIRI KARM KAUR KHALSA; KARTAR SINGH KHALSA; KARAM SINGH KHALSA; ROY L
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Mariani v. United Statespublic domain
80 F.Supp.2d 352 (1999) Renato P. MARIANI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Federal Election Commission, Intervenor-Defendant. No. 3:CV-98-1701. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 27, 1999. *353 *354 Eli C. Schulman, Floyd Abrams, Susan Buckley, Jame