Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Susan Jane Mann”
266 S.W.3d 25 (2008) Nancy BENEFIELD, Nancy S. McNulty, Naomi Morales, Robert Seton, Ruthie Parker, Susan Berkley, Gloria Reeves, Shirley Buelow, and Angela Breedlove, Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas on Relation of the Alvin Community Health Endeavor, Inc. and Brazoria County, Texas, Appellees. No. 01-07-00970-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 14, 200
Robert E. Mann Construction Co. v. Liebert Corp.public domain
60 P.3d 708 (2003) 204 Ariz. 129 ROBERT E. MANN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Appellee, v. LIEBERT CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation and Integrated Support Systems, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Third Party Defendants-Appellees, Cross Appellants. No. 1 CA-CV 01-0212. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. Jan
470 F.3d 331 John DOE and Jane Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Brady SMITH, Dianne Shepard, Kathryn Fletcher, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-3421. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 21, 2005. Decided November 28, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Anderson v. Hess Corp.public domain
733 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2010) Jerome C. ANDERSON, Patricia M. Barstad, Joan M. Barstad, Jane C. Craft, Peggy M. Cowan, Jerome Anderson as Trustee of the Anderson Family Mineral Trust, John C. Anderson, Ray Anderson, Oscar R. Anderson, Beatrice Anderson, Donald Tarczanin, Susan Tarczanin, and Cora Anderson, Plaintiffs, v. HESS CORPORATION, Defendant. Hess Corporation, Counterclaimant, v. Jerome C. Anderson, et al., Counterdefendants.<
Jane Doe v. Beaumont Independent School Districtpublic domain
173 F.3d 274 134 Ed. Law Rep. 52 Jane DOE, By their next friends Susan DOE, Mary Doe & LisaDoe; June Doe, By their next friends Susan Doe, Mary Doe &Lisa Doe; Janet Doe, By their next friends Susan Doe, MaryDoe & Lisa Doe; Jill Doe, By their next friends Susan Doe,Mary Doe & Lisa Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BEAUMONT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
Graham v. Grahampublic domain
PER CURIAM: The appellant, Susan Jane Graham, appeals from a final order of the Circuit Court of Clay County which, inter alia, awarded her former husband, Homer Graham, Jr., the appellee, custody of one of the two children born of the parties’ marriage, Anne Susan Graham. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. On November 24, 1982, the appellee filed suit for divorce in the Circuit Court of
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, United States District Judge' This case between the plaintiffs and the one non-settling defendant, Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company, was tried to the Court on June 23-25, 2014. The issues remaining for trial after this Court’s previous orders on various motions were whether Mountain States unreasonably delayed or denied payment o
Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd.public domain
ORDER AND OPINION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 29, 2016, the Court held a bench trial and heard evidence in this patent infringement case. Before the Court are several equitable remedies and defens*864es raised by the Parties, in addition to open questions of law under 35 U.S.C.
National Awareness Foundation v. Abramspublic domain
812 F.Supp. 431 (1993) NATIONAL AWARENESS FOUNDATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert ABRAMS, Attorney General of the State of New York and Gail S. Shaffer, Secretary of the State of New York, Defendants. No. 91 Civ. 7670 (GLG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 9, 1993. *432 Copilevitz, Bryant, Gray & Jennin
APPEL, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I concur with Justice Wiggins’s opinion. In light of the virtually unprecedented determination of Justice Mansfield’s opinion to reach out to uphold the district court on grounds other than those decided by the district court and that the parties chose not to present on appeal, I proceed to state *5
Miles-Un-Ltd., Inc. v. Town of New Shoreham, RIpublic domain
917 F.Supp. 91 (1996) MILES-UN-LTD., INC., Aldos Mopeds, Inc., Finnimore & Fisher, Inc., Ocean State Bikes, Inc. and M & J Transportation, Inc. and The Moped Man, Inc. v. TOWN OF NEW SHOREHAM, RI, Mary Jane Balser, Edward F. McGovern, Jr., Kimberly Gaffett, Anthony Edwards, Martha Ball, Everett Littlefield, Douglas H. Michel and Susan Shea. NH Civil No. 95-356-JM, RI Civil No. 95-CV-326B, RI Civil No. 95-456-ML.
Renz v. Northside Hospital, Inc.public domain
648 S.E.2d 186 (2007) RENZ v. NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL, INC. No. A07A0040. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 18, 2007. *187 Decker, Hallman, Barber & Briggs, W. Winston Briggs, Atlanta, for Appellant. Sommers, Scrudder & Bass Susan V. Sommers, Jane C. Taylor, for Appellee. JOHNSON, Presiding Judge. This is
50 F.Supp.2d 1288 (1999) TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT/ADVANCE-NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Time Warner Cable, Plaintiff, v. WORLDWIDE ELECTRONICS, L.C. d/b/a Worldwide Electronics, Nationwide Electronics, Inc. d/b/a Nationwide Electronics, Alan Marks, Lewis Schneiderman, Susan Marks a/k/a Susan Mann, Audrey Schneiderman, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 3-10, Unidentified Corporations 1-10 and Unidentified Business Entities 1-10, Defendants.
817 F.2d 1471 Larry Eugene MANN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-3182. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. May 14, 1987. Larry H. Spalding, Office of Capital Collateral Representative, Michael A. Mello, Mark Eva
Davis v. City of Berkeleypublic domain
51 Cal.3d 227 (1990) 794 P.2d 897 272 Cal. Rptr. 139 SARA E. DAVIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF BERKELEY et al., Defendants and Respondents; GENE MANN et al., Interveners and Respondents. Docket No. S002285. Supreme Court of California. August 9, 1990. *230 COUNSEL<
State v. Grayhurstpublic domain
852 A.2d 491 (2004) STATE v. Michael R. GRAYHURST. No. 2001-119-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 23, 2004. *499 Jane M. McSoley, Esq., Providence, For Plaintiff. Robert B. Mann, Esq., Providence, For Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., FLANDERS, GOLDBERG, and FLAHERTY, JJ. OPINION WIL
SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judge: In these appeals that were consolidated for argument, holders of unredeemed consumer gift cards issued by the former book retailer BGI Inc., f/k/a Borders Group, Inc. and its affiliates (“Borders” or “Debtors”) seek to vacate a May 28, 2013 judgment of the District Court (Andrew L. Carter, Jr., Judge) dismissing as equitably moot Appellants’ challenges to three Bankruptcy Court orders.
Phillips v. Koepkepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Defendants in a medical malpractice case seek certiorari review of an order denying their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the mandatory presuit requirements, specifically that the verified medical opinion was not from a medical expert as defined by section 766.202(5) Florida Statutes. We deny certio-rari because it is clear that the court did not depart from the esse
Doe v. Board of Educationpublic domain
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff John Doe (“John”) was a recently enrolled, 13-year-old freshman at Oak Park & River Forest High School (“OPRF”), when he was accused of being in possession of a pipe and a small amount of marijuana at a freshman dance on September 9,1994. John was a special education student who had been identified as having a learning disability. The OPRF Board of Education (the “Board”) issued a ten-
State v. Paynepublic domain
225 P.3d 1131 (2009) The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Stetson Austin PAYNE, Appellant. The State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Channtell Nelson, Appellant. The State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Susan Jane Daniels, Appellant. Nos. 2 CA-CR 2008-0166, 2 CA-CR 2008-0171, 2 CA-CR 2008-0309. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. July 24, 2009.