Cases

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: *269A petition for certification of the judgment in A-001213-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

MEMORANDUM ** Convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Tommy Hart appeals the denial of his motion to suppress the gun he tossed out a window of his home and statements made to the San Francisco police after his arrest. Even assuming the Personal Protective Services (“PPS”) officers are state actors, we conclude that the district court did not err in denyi

646 F.Supp.2d 582 (2009) James MAHONEY, as Director of the Transport Workers Union Local 100 Retirees' Association, and Plan Administrator of the Transport Workers Union Local 100 Retirees' Association Benefit Plan, et al., Plaintiffs, v. J.J. WEISER & COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 2592(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 18, 2009.

J.N.H. (petitioner) appeals from the order requiring him to seek adoption records, in order to learn the name of his birth father, through a confidential intermediary under section 19-5-305(2)(a), C.R.S. 2008. Because, contrary to the trial court's conclusion, we discern that the statute permits petitioner to access the adoption records, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. I. Factual and Procedural Background Petit

WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur fully in the majority opinion's analysis and conclusion that the Proclamation's indefinite suspension of entry of nationals from eight countries, six of which are predominantly Muslim, likely violates the Establishment Clause. I also concur fully in the majority opinion's conclusion that Plaintiffs have standing to assert their constitutional claim, that Plaintiffs' constitutional cla

945 F.Supp. 1009 (1996) T. Alan HART v. UNITED STATES of America. No. 1:95CV735. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. September 27, 1996. *1010 Kip Kevin Lamb, Susan J. Oliver, Alex J. Stelly, Hubert Oxford, III, Benckenstein & Oxford, Beaumont, for plaintiff. Lavon L. Jones, U.S. Attorney's Off

The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D. Plaintiffs complaint alleged various causes of action in tort (the State law claims) and a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (the § 1983 claim), all arising from certain actions of his superior *491officers in the Jersey City Police Department. The motion judge dismissed the State law cl

Hunt, Justice. We granted this petition for the writ of habeas corpus to determine whether the trial court erred in holding petitioner had waived his claims regarding the sufficiency of the evidence and double jeopardy. However, we need not make that determination because our review of the record indicates these claims are without merit. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the convictions on the two counts for child molestati

41 S.W.3d 504 (2000) AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. Nancy HART, Defendant, Joe Hart, Jr., Respondent, Melvin Dewey, Dixie Dewey, Brian Dewey, Susan Hollingsworth, Appellants. Nos. WD 57969, WD 58135. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. December 29, 2000. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied February 27, 2001.

842 P.2d 777 (1992) Susan HART, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA COUNTY, Oklahoma, Appellee, and Annettee Jett and Glen Graham, Defendants. No. 78235. Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. November 24, 1992. James A. Williamson, Tulsa, for appellant. J. Dennis Semler, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tulsa, for appellee. Released

LIGHT, J.S.C. This case sets forth the methodology to equitably set child support in cases of multiple family obligations, expanding on the Appellate Division’s recent decision in Harte v. Hand, 433 N.J.Super. 457, 462, 81 A.3d 667 (App.Div.2013). Second, it clarifies the effect of the self-support reserve in modifying child support awards. Finally, it sets out the procedure to modify and equitably distribu

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. This case is before us for the second time, following our certification to the Vermont Supreme Court of three questions regarding Vermont workers’ compensation law. See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Carpenter, 313 F.3d 97, 109 (2d Cir.2002) (“Travelers I”). By order dated August 31, 2004, the Vermont Supreme Court dismiss

SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judge: Matthew J. Hart sued FCI Lender Services, Inc. (“FCI”), his mortgage loan servicer and a debt collector, seeking damages under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. Hart asserts. that FCI violated the Act by sending him two written communications that failed to comply with FDCPA requ

Hart v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., No. 258-7-12 Bncv (Wesley, J. Apr. 29, 2014). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Benn

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the Town Board of the Town of Hunting*681ton, both dated January 11, 2011, approving Resolution 2011-31, which adopted a Findings Statement pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8) and Resolution 2011-32, which enacted Local Law Introductory No. 7-2010 of the Town of Huntington so a

66 So.3d 44 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Michael R. HART. No. 10-KA-905. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 10, 2011. *46 Paul D. Connick, District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Gail D. Schlosser, Michael Escudier, Assistant District Attorneys, Gretna, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Margaret S. Sollars, Attorney

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey A. Hart ("appellant"), Executor of the Estate of Lorna M. Hart ("decedent"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court denied appellant's motion for summary judgment and *Page 2 granted the motion for summary judgment of defendants-appellees, Charles Hart and Mary Susan Hart ("appellees").

894 N.E.2d 1032 (2008) William H. HART, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Walter C. WEBSTER and The Steak-N-Shake Company, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A05-0802-CV-47. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 15, 2008. *1033 John R. Carr, III, Christopher D. Seigel, Charles N. Doberneck, Ayres Carr & Sullivan, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Attorn

Hart v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., No. 258-7-12 Bncv (Wesley, J., June 24, 2014). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL

RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5430-11T4 A-5431-11T4 SUSAN MARIE HARTE, Plaintiff-Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v.