⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Susan J Kurz”

State v. Kurzpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004-08-17 · Published · cited 2× · 685 N.W.2d 447; 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 966; 2004 WL 1827190
685 N.W.2d 447 (2004) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kevin Paul KURZ, Appellant. No. A03-1747. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. August 17, 2004. Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Patrick W. Flanagan, Mower County Attorney, Jeremy Clinefelter, Assistant County Attorney, Austin, MN, for respondent. John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Susan J.
State v. WISONGpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008-08-26 · Published · cited 0× · 260 S.W.3d 855; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119; 2008 WL 3895899
260 S.W.3d 855 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Peter V. WISONG, Appellant. No. WD 67516. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 26, 2008. Susan L. Hogan, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Rebecca Kurz, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before Div III: ELLIS, P.J., HARDWICK and DANDURAND,
Naumann v. Kurzpublic domain
Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989-08-25 · Published · cited 20× · 152 Vt. 355; 566 A.2d 1342; 1989 Vt. LEXIS 188
Peck, J. Plaintiff was granted a divorce on March 10, 1987, on the grounds that the parties had lived separate and apart for six consecutive months and resumption of marital relations was not reasonably probable. Defendant wife appeals the decree, alleging that the trial court erred by failing to award maintenance payments to her. We reverse. The divorce decree issued by the court liquidates most of the couple’
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. TORNETTA, Individually ) and on Behalf of All Others Similarly ) Situated and Derivatively on Behalf of ) Nominal Defendant TESLA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0408-KSJM ) ELON MUSK, ROBYN M.
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010-05-07 · Published · cited 3× · 711 F. Supp. 2d 679; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55537; 2010 WL 1889428
711 F.Supp.2d 679 (2010) Charlene BEELER-LOPEZ v. DODEKA, LLC, Putonti & Escover, PC, and Balekian Hayes, PLLC. Case No. 4:09-cv-489. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. May 7, 2010. *680 Dennis Robert Kurz, Kurz & Fortas, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Susan Ostermiller Landgraf, Weisberg & Meyers LLC, Aus
District Court, S.D. New York · 1996-09-18 · Published · cited 1× · 937 F. Supp. 328; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13692; 1996 WL 531864
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Vincent and Susan Marchewka bring this action against Defendant Bermuda Star Lines, Inc. (“BSL”) for injuries and loss of consortium resulting from a fall from a ladder aboard a cruise ship belonging to the Defendant.1 Defendant now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1992-08-11 · Published · cited 6× · 803 F. Supp. 46; 1992 WL 274323
803 F.Supp. 46 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Donald E. DISTLER, et al., defendants. PORTER PAINT CO., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ARISTOKRAFT CORPORATION, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Nos. 88-0200-L(J), 88-0201-L(J). United States District Court, W.D. Kentuc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 6402
Matter of Yonkers Firefighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO v City of Yonkers (2019 NY Slip Op 06402) Matter of Yonkers Firefighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO v City of Yonkers 2019 NY Slip Op 06402 Decided on August 28, 2019
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 6391
Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO (2019 NY Slip Op 06391) Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO 2019 NY Slip Op 06391 Decided on August 28, 2019
Zink v. Lombardipublic domain
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015-10-14 · Published · cited 0× · 139 F. Supp. 3d 1013; 2015 WL 6164227
ORDER AND OPINION (1) GRANTING IN PART AND FINDING TO BE MOOT IN PART INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO UNSEAL DOCKET ENTRIES AND (2) STAYING ORDER PENDING CONCLUSION OF ANY APPEALS BETH PHILLIPS, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Larry Flynt (“the Intervenor”) has intervened to challenge the continued sealing of certain Docket Entries on the Court’s Docket Sheet. For the reasons set forth below, the
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997-06-03 · Published · cited 3× · 114 F.3d 283; 324 U.S. App. D.C. 429; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12795; 1997 WL 289193
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Donald J. Jackson seeks review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB or Board) affirming an oral decision and order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) which in turn affirmed the finding of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that Jackson violated two air safety regulations: 14 C.F.R. § 91.123(a),
Molleur v. Molleurpublic domain
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012-03-09 · Published · cited 20× · 2012 VT 16; 44 A.3d 763; 191 Vt. 202; 2012 Vt. LEXIS 15
Burgess, J., ¶ 30. dissenting in part. While the family division enjoys broad discretion in dividing marital property, the court’s findings must still support its conclusions. In this case, its findings that wife invested little or nothing in the domestic enterprise generally, that she contributed virtually nothing economically to the marital estate, and lent little support in child rearing, do not justify the windfall of 75% of t
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983-04-04 · Published · cited 18× · 704 F.2d 368; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29121
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Petitioner-Appellant Earl Robinson appeals from an order dismissing his second habeas corpus petition as an abuse of the writ under Rule 9(b), 28 U.S.C. fol. § 2254. 1 I. Petitioner was convicted of first degree murder and is presently s
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-03-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 Ohio 1137
[Cite as Jenkins v. Karl HC, L.L.C., 2020-Ohio-1137.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT William Jenkins, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-572 (C.P.C. No. 17CV-7371) v. :
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001-03-12 · Published · cited 1× · 243 F.3d 1316; 2001 WL 238215
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. and Agri-genetics, Inc. (collectively, “Mycogen”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware upholding a jury verdict of patent invalidity pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) in favor of Monsanto Company, DeKalb Genetics Corporation, and Delta and Pine Land Company (collectively, “Monsanto”). The patents at issue in this trial are U.S.
Quinn v. Fishkinpublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015-08-04 · Published · cited 8× · 117 F. Supp. 3d 134; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101518; 2015 WL 4635770
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. The plaintiff, Susan ■ Quinn (“Quinn”),brings this action against defendants Stanley Fishkin (“Fishkin”) and Lee Shalov (“Shalov”). Quinn seeks an order that would permit her to declare a settlement agreement in a previous case before this court null and void, so that she may pursue claims against Fishkin, her former financial advisor,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985-04-04 · Published · cited 38× · 606 F. Supp. 401; 58 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 84; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21022
606 F.Supp. 401 (1985) The BRUSS COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, and Hinckley & Schmitt, Inc., an Illinois corporation, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALLNET COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation, Michael P. Richer, Melvyn J. Goodman, Robert F. Downing, and Julia A. Vinson, Defendants. No. 84 C 3611. United States District Court,
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984-05-14 · Published · cited 5× · 59 Md. App. 206; 474 A.2d 1353; 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 351
MOYLAN, Judge. The appellee is Blue Cross , of Washington and Alaska (Blue Cross). The only question on this appeal is that of what business engaged in by Blue Cross or obligation undertaken by Blue Cross will bring it within the reach of Maryland’s “long-arm” statute and subject it, therefore, to the in personam jurisdiction of the courts of this state. Blue Cross is a nonprofit corporation organiz
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022-02-24 · Published · cited 13× · 400 Wis. 2d 592; 970 N.W.2d 243; 2022 WI 11
2022 WI 11 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP2090 COMPLETE TITLE: Claudia B. Bauer , individually and Claudia B. Bauer , as Trustee of the Claudia B. Bauer Revocable Trust 2010 Restatement, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 2× · 889 F.3d 920
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jay Zola and Jeremiah Joseph Lowney (collectively, Zola), Tyler Verdieck, and Michael Sarbacker filed separate class-action complaints against TD Ameritrade, Inc., alleging various state-law claims. 1 The *922