Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Susan J Kurz”
State v. Kurzpublic domain
685 N.W.2d 447 (2004) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kevin Paul KURZ, Appellant. No. A03-1747. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. August 17, 2004. Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Patrick W. Flanagan, Mower County Attorney, Jeremy Clinefelter, Assistant County Attorney, Austin, MN, for respondent. John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Susan J.
State v. WISONGpublic domain
260 S.W.3d 855 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Peter V. WISONG, Appellant. No. WD 67516. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 26, 2008. Susan L. Hogan, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Rebecca Kurz, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before Div III: ELLIS, P.J., HARDWICK and DANDURAND,
Naumann v. Kurzpublic domain
Peck, J. Plaintiff was granted a divorce on March 10, 1987, on the grounds that the parties had lived separate and apart for six consecutive months and resumption of marital relations was not reasonably probable. Defendant wife appeals the decree, alleging that the trial court erred by failing to award maintenance payments to her. We reverse. The divorce decree issued by the court liquidates most of the couple’
Richard J. Tornetta v. Elon Muskpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. TORNETTA, Individually ) and on Behalf of All Others Similarly ) Situated and Derivatively on Behalf of ) Nominal Defendant TESLA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0408-KSJM ) ELON MUSK, ROBYN M.
Beeler-Lopez v. DODEKA, LLCpublic domain
711 F.Supp.2d 679 (2010) Charlene BEELER-LOPEZ v. DODEKA, LLC, Putonti & Escover, PC, and Balekian Hayes, PLLC. Case No. 4:09-cv-489. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. May 7, 2010. *680 Dennis Robert Kurz, Kurz & Fortas, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Susan Ostermiller Landgraf, Weisberg & Meyers LLC, Aus
Marchewka v. Bermuda Star Lines, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Vincent and Susan Marchewka bring this action against Defendant Bermuda Star Lines, Inc. (“BSL”) for injuries and loss of consortium resulting from a fall from a ladder aboard a cruise ship belonging to the Defendant.1 Defendant now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro
United States v. Distlerpublic domain
803 F.Supp. 46 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Donald E. DISTLER, et al., defendants. PORTER PAINT CO., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ARISTOKRAFT CORPORATION, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Nos. 88-0200-L(J), 88-0201-L(J). United States District Court, W.D. Kentuc
Matter of Yonkers Firefighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO v. City of Yonkerspublic domain
Matter of Yonkers Firefighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO v City of Yonkers (2019 NY Slip Op 06402) Matter of Yonkers Firefighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO v City of Yonkers 2019 NY Slip Op 06402 Decided on August 28, 2019
Matter of City of Yonkers v. Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIOpublic domain
Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO (2019 NY Slip Op 06391) Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO 2019 NY Slip Op 06391 Decided on August 28, 2019
Zink v. Lombardipublic domain
ORDER AND OPINION (1) GRANTING IN PART AND FINDING TO BE MOOT IN PART INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO UNSEAL DOCKET ENTRIES AND (2) STAYING ORDER PENDING CONCLUSION OF ANY APPEALS BETH PHILLIPS, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Larry Flynt (“the Intervenor”) has intervened to challenge the continued sealing of certain Docket Entries on the Court’s Docket Sheet. For the reasons set forth below, the
Donald J. Jackson v. National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administrationpublic domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Donald J. Jackson seeks review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB or Board) affirming an oral decision and order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) which in turn affirmed the finding of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that Jackson violated two air safety regulations: 14 C.F.R. § 91.123(a),
Molleur v. Molleurpublic domain
Burgess, J., ¶ 30. dissenting in part. While the family division enjoys broad discretion in dividing marital property, the court’s findings must still support its conclusions. In this case, its findings that wife invested little or nothing in the domestic enterprise generally, that she contributed virtually nothing economically to the marital estate, and lent little support in child rearing, do not justify the windfall of 75% of t
Earl Robinson, Jr. v. J.W. Fairman, Wardenpublic domain
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Petitioner-Appellant Earl Robinson appeals from an order dismissing his second habeas corpus petition as an abuse of the writ under Rule 9(b), 28 U.S.C. fol. § 2254. 1 I. Petitioner was convicted of first degree murder and is presently s
Jenkins v. Karl HC, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Jenkins v. Karl HC, L.L.C., 2020-Ohio-1137.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT William Jenkins, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-572 (C.P.C. No. 17CV-7371) v. :
Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.public domain
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. and Agri-genetics, Inc. (collectively, “Mycogen”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware upholding a jury verdict of patent invalidity pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) in favor of Monsanto Company, DeKalb Genetics Corporation, and Delta and Pine Land Company (collectively, “Monsanto”). The patents at issue in this trial are U.S.
Quinn v. Fishkinpublic domain
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. The plaintiff, Susan ■ Quinn (“Quinn”),brings this action against defendants Stanley Fishkin (“Fishkin”) and Lee Shalov (“Shalov”). Quinn seeks an order that would permit her to declare a settlement agreement in a previous case before this court null and void, so that she may pursue claims against Fishkin, her former financial advisor,
Bruss Co. v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc.public domain
606 F.Supp. 401 (1985) The BRUSS COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, and Hinckley & Schmitt, Inc., an Illinois corporation, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALLNET COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation, Michael P. Richer, Melvyn J. Goodman, Robert F. Downing, and Julia A. Vinson, Defendants. No. 84 C 3611. United States District Court,
Tate v. Blue Cross of Washington & Alaskapublic domain
MOYLAN, Judge. The appellee is Blue Cross , of Washington and Alaska (Blue Cross). The only question on this appeal is that of what business engaged in by Blue Cross or obligation undertaken by Blue Cross will bring it within the reach of Maryland’s “long-arm” statute and subject it, therefore, to the in personam jurisdiction of the courts of this state. Blue Cross is a nonprofit corporation organiz
Claudia B. Bauer v. Wisconsin Energy Corporationpublic domain
2022 WI 11 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP2090 COMPLETE TITLE: Claudia B. Bauer , individually and Claudia B. Bauer , as Trustee of the Claudia B. Bauer Revocable Trust 2010 Restatement, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin
Jay Zola v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.public domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jay Zola and Jeremiah Joseph Lowney (collectively, Zola), Tyler Verdieck, and Michael Sarbacker filed separate class-action complaints against TD Ameritrade, Inc., alleging various state-law claims. 1 The *922