Cases

164 Ariz. 586 (1990) 795 P.2d 229 The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Gregg Harold BELYEU, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 89-0338. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. June 21, 1990. As Corrected June 26, 1990. *587 Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Jessica Gifford Funkhouser and Di

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 406 (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 339 In re Leslie VAN HOUTEN on Habeas Corpus. No. E032032. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two. March 1, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 30, 2004. Review Denied June 23, 2004.[*] *408 Bill Lockyer, Atto

Opinion HUMES, P. J. Appellants Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Wirelessco, L.P., Nextel of California, Inc., and Nextel Boost of California, LLC (collectively referred to as Sprint or the company), filed this action seeking a refund on taxes they paid on property assessed by respondent Board of Equalization (the Board). The Legislature has mandated that for a telephone company to file such a

Filed 8/14/15 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A140540 v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et (San Francisco County al

Filed 7/16/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A140540 v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et (San Francisco County al.,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE LENDINGCLUB CORP. ) CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 12984-VCM MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: July 17, 2019 Date Decided: October 31, 2019 Seth D. Rigrodsky, Brian D. Long, Gina M. Serra, RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Robert I. Harwood, Matthew M. Houston, HARWOOD FEFFER LLP, New Yor

FITZWATER, District Judge: In this action alleging sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and a pendent state-law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, the magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to undergo a Fed.R.Civ.P. 35(a) mental examination. See Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., 164 F.R.D. 196 (N.D.Tex

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Plaintiff Anthony Pacchia has challenged a transaction through which Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision” or the “Company”) and an entity controlled by Activision’s two senior officers acquired over 50% of the Company’s outstanding shares from Vivendi S.A., its controlling stockholder, for approximately $8 billion in cash. The plaintiff contends that Vivendi and the mem

719 F.Supp.2d 1031 (2010) Ernest GIBSON, Minor, by his guardian ad litem, Susan M. Gramling, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., Armstrong Containers, Inc., E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Millenium Holdings LLC, NL Industries, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Co., The Sherwin Williams Co., and Milwaukee County Department of Health and Services, Defendants. Case No. 07-C-864. United States District Court, E.

695 So.2d 672 (1997) William F. POE, Sr., Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, City of Tampa, Florida and Tampa Sports Authority, Appellees, Cross-Appellants. No. 90223. Supreme Court of Florida. May 22, 1997. Rehearing Denied June 18, 1997. *673 Diane D. Tremor and Chris H. Bentley of Rose, Sundstr

*1557JUDGMENT BILLINGS, District Judge. Plaintiff has filed his complaint and the defendant appeared by counsel, filed answer to the complaint and, without admitting liability, agrees to the entry of this judgment without contest. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendant, her agents, se

167 F.Supp.2d 298 (2001) BOCA INVESTERINGS PARTNERSHIP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 97-0602 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 5, 2001. *299 Melvin White, Diane L. Cafritz, Christopher Kliefoth, William L. Goldman, Karla Palmer, McDermott Will & E

895 F.Supp. 1018 (1995) William R. FRY, Anthony J. Marra, Sidney Mishkin, Thomas J. Dwyer, Kathleen B. Dwyer, Progressive Corporation, and Meridian Strategic Investments, L.P., Plaintiffs, v. UAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. 90 C 0999. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 11, 1995.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AL OTRO LADO, a California Nos. 22-55988 corporation; ABIGAIL DOE; 22-56036 BEATRICE DOE; CAROLINA DOE; DINORA DOE; INGRID DOE; D.C. No. URSULA DOE; VICTORIA DOE; 3:17-cv-02366- BIANCA DOE; JUAN DOE; BAS-KSC ROBERTO DOE; CESAR DOE; MARIA DOE; EMILIANA DOE, ORDER AND

Opinion PALMER, J. The defendant, Mark Bova, was convicted after a jury trial of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a) and conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a (a) and 53a-48 (a).1 The defendant appeals from the judgment of the *213trial court sentencing him to c

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I. Introduction. The district court and the majority undoubtedly are driven by a commendable desire to resolve voluminous personal injury claims against an otherwise strong American company and to ensure an orderly transfer of funds from the company’s insurers to its victims. In order to accomplish this result, however, they have extin