Cases

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JOHN R. ARNOLD, JR., J. ROBERT ARNOLD AND JJJR PROPERTIES, LLC., Appellants, Case No. 5D21-222 v. LT Case No. 2018-

Per Curiam: Mr. Randall Arnold appeals a Saline County Circuit Court judgment denying his 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Arnold pleaded guilty in October 2015 to one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.

KHOUZAM, Judge. Ob Akeem Rendell Arnold appeals his convictions and sentences for robbery while wearing a mask and resisting an officer without violence. We affirm in all respects but remand for the entry of a written competency order. Arnold argues that he was deprived of due process because the circuit court failed to conduct a sufficient competency he

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-0

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Susan King brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Kentucky State Police (KSP) Detective Todd Harwood, three of Harwood’s supervisors, and unnamed law-enforcement officers and their supervisors, all in their individual capacities, along with the Kentucky State Police. The district court granted Defendants’ “Motion to Dismis

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. This case arises out of a dispute over a life insurance policy. When Susan De-Coursey sued American General Life Insurance Company (the company) for interest she claimed it owed her on a payout it made on a . policy, the company counterclaimed, asking for its money back because it had paid DeCoursey by mistake and so DeCoursey was not entitled to the payou

09/10/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 8, 2018 Session SUSAN HEMBREE SCHUMACHER v. KERRY JAMES SCHUMACHER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 00D-2918 Philip E. Smith, Judge ___

CANADY, Judge. Chris A. Arnold appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Because the trial court improperly denied Mr. Arnold’s motion for continuance, we reverse the final judgment and remand this case for further proceedings. This action began when Ms. Arnold, through counsel, filed a petition for dissolution of marriage on December 17, 2002. Mr. Arnold, also through counsel, filed an answer

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Luther Arnold appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, claiming that the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”) compel his speech in violation of the First Amendment. We affirm. I.

07/19/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 28, 2023 Session ESTATE OF SUSAN BALLARD ET AL. v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 7700 A. Blake Neill, Judge _

DAVIS, Justice: The petitioner herein and plaintiff below, Judith. D. Ward (“Judith Ward”), appeals from, an order entered January 29, 2016, by the Circuit Court of Hampshire County. ■ By that order, the circuit court granted relief to Judith Ward upon her action for unlawful detainer against the respondent herein and defendant below, Susan K. Ward (“Susan Ward”). In granting such

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Richard Arnold, Sr., appeals the district court’s forfeiture order following his wire fraud and conspiracy convictions and sentencing for a scheme involving vehicle-financing rebates. 1 He argues the district court erred by (1) imposing an order of forfeiture, after sente

Fairhurst, J. ¶1 RCW 49.48.030 provides that employees are entitled to reasonable attorney fees from their employer or former employer “[i]n any action in which any person is successful in recovering judgment for wages or salary owed to him or her.” This case concerns whether a city of Seattle (City) employee who recovered wages from a Seattle Civil Service Commission (Commission) hearing is entitled to attorney fees under RCW 49

ORDER PER CURIAM. Husband, Gary Edwin Arnold, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to wife, Cynthia Brown Arnold. He challenges the court’s determination of the fair market value of a business, distribution of the marital assets, and failure to award him maintenance and attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 12, 2015 SUSAN MARIE JOYCE v. BRUCE CADE ELLARD Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 13CV607 Robert E. Corlew, III, Judge No. M2014-01550-COA-R3-CV – Filed May 26, 2015 Wife appeals the trial court‟s division of property and award of trans

GRIFFIN, J. After consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Michael Lingane and the responses filed by respondent, Susan P. Arnold, and the State of Florida, the court has determined that the petition should be construed as a notice of an appeal and has expedited review in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.691(c). We reverse the trial court’s order denying peti

ORDER ON OMNIBUS MOTION #1 STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. In an “omnibus motion in limine ” (Doc. 74), Novartis seeks a series of evidentiary exclusions. Arnold responds (Doc. 86) in opposition. The issues, as denominated by Novartis in “Motion # 1” of document 74, are resolved as follows: A.Mrs. Arnold never treated with Are-dia

616 F.Supp.2d 1219 (2009) SUSAN J., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bob RILEY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, et al., Defendants. No. 2:00-cv-918-MEF. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. April 29, 2009. *1224 Deborah Ann Mattison, Rachel Lee McGinley, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pan

Justice Boyd delivered the opinion of the Court. The primary issue in these two separate cases is whether a “life settlement agreement” or “viatical settlement agreement” is , an “investment contract” and thus a “security” under the Texas Securities Act. We hold that the agreements at issue are investment contracts because they constitute transactions through which a person pays money to participate in a common

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Eleven named plaintiffs seek to represent a class of disabled persons. The Defendants are Bob Riley, as Governor of the State of Alabama, John Houston, as Commissioner of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, and The Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation. Plaintiffs challenge the w