Cases

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SOROKIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Susan Young brought this suit against the trustee of the trust that holds the mortgage to her home, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, and the servicer of the mortgage, Homeward Residential.1 Be*391fore the Court is Defendants’ Motio

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. ' Plaintiff-appellant Susan K. Young, previously before us after her action was dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Young I), 717 F.3d 224 (1st Cir. 2013), again attempts to avert the foreclosure of her home after seeking a mortgage modification under the Home Affordable

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. In an attempt to avert the foreclosure of her home, plaintiff Susan Young sought to modify the terms of her mortgage pursuant to the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”), a federal initiative that ineentivizes lenders and loan servicers to offer loan modifications to eligible homeowners. When Young’s efforts did not result in a permanent loan modific

Sayed A. v. Susan A. No. 1365, Sept. Term 2024 Opinion by Leahy, J. Contempt > Power to Punish, and Proceedings Therefor > Appeal or Error > Review The circuit court’s failure to use the word “willful” in finding contempt does not, by itself, “rebut th[e] presumption” that the judge knew the law and applied it properly. Bahena v. Foster, 164 Md. App. 275, 288 (2005). Here, although the court articulated what may otherwise be a sufficient basis for finding Father in contempt, the court’s express

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 40 & 42) HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment in this action brought under the terms of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion (Docket No. 42) is granted and Defendants’ motion (Docket No. 40) is d

PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for lewd or lascivious molestation of a child less than twelve years old. Although he raises several points on appeal, we conclude that only one point has merit and necessitates a new trial. The trial court erred by admitting as impeachment evidence the certified copies of Appellant’s prior convictions for similar crimes.

*1240 FISHER, Circuit Judge. Appellant Earl Wayne Wyatt, a Rastafarian inmate, filed this § 1983 action challenging the California Department of Corrections’ hair length regulations as a violation of his constitutional and statutory rights to free exercise of religion and equal protection of the laws.

341 S.W.3d 417 (2011) Robert Alan YOUNG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. PD-1030-10. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. June 15, 2011. *419 Susan Schoon, New Braunfels, for Appellant. Michael A. Mark, Asst. State Prosecuting Atty., Lisa C. McMinn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS FROM THE RECORD (Docket No. 23) HILLMAN, District Judge. This is an ERISA action in which Plaintiff Susan Young (“Plaintiff’) challenges the Defendants’ termination of long-term disability benefits under the Children’s Hospital Boston Group Long Term Disability Plan, an employee welfare benefit plan. Plaintiff has filed a motion to

986 A.2d 497 (2009) The STATE of New Hampshire v. Damien K. YOUNG. No. 2008-399. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: September 10, 2009. Opinion Issued: October 30, 2009. *499 Kelly A. Ayotte, attorney general (Susan P. McGinnis, senior assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State.

WOOD, Circuit Judge. For many years, Susan Vucko was employed by the Northwest Building Materials and Supply Company, where she both worked at the retail sales counter and performed various bookkeeping tasks. In the mid-1990s Vucko began to help herself to Northwest’s money, eventually pilfering more than $700,000. Meanwhile, Vucko also defrauded the United States by falsely rep

995 A.2d 826 (2010) 202 N.J. 50 In the matter of the Tenure Hearing of Gilbert YOUNG, Jr., District of the Borough of Roselle, Union County. A-39 September Term 2009. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 23, 2010. Decided May 12, 2010. *828 Louis P. Bucceri, Clifton, argued the cause for a

SMOLENSK, P J. In this appeal by the prosecution, the sole question before us is whether the trial court articulated a substantial and compelling reason to justify its departure from the sentencing guidelines when sentencing defendant for his jury conviction of armed robbery. Because we conclude that the trial court failed to articulate a substantial and compelling reason for the departure, we vacate defendant’s sentence and rema

54 Cal.Rptr.3d 847 (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1078 Richard YOUNG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Kathy Jayne McCOY, as Trustee, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B189885. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One. February 21, 2007. *848 Robert Hirschman & Associates and Robert

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, D.J. I. Introduction This ease concerns- the tragic death of Yogambigai Pasupathipillai (“Pasupathipil-lai”). On August 6, 2013, Pasupathipillai suffered a fatal accident while working at the Piantedosi bakery in Malden, Massachusetts. Compl. ¶ 9, ECF No. 1-1. Thiru Satchi (“Satchi”), as administrator of Pasu-pathipillai’s estate, brings this motion against R

OPINION JUSTICE TODD The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees citizens protection against the government by limiting its power to punish. In this appeal by allowance, we consider, inter alia, the constitutional limitations on civil in rem forfeiture in Pennsylvania under the Excessive Fines C

POLSTON, C.J. Petitioners, Patricia Young, Alani Blis-sard, and the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI), argue that the Third District Court of Appeal in Broin v. Phillip Morris Cos., Inc., 84 So.3d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), erred in quashing the trial court’s order disqualifying several attorneys, including Steven Hunter and Philip Gerson, fro

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. *923566 (AC 16090), is granted, limited to the following issue: The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16339. Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...399 II. BACKGROUND...400 A. The Broome County Jail...401 B. Solitary Confinement at the Jail...401 C. Andrea Weisman, Ph.D....401 D. Defendants' Opposition...402 1. Proposed Regulatory Amendment...402

PER CURIAM. In No. 02-6600, Darnell A. Toles appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action attacking enforcement of the prison’s grooming policy. In No. 02-6599, the prison officials cross-appealed, arguing the district court should have dismissed Toles’ complaint on other grounds. In No. 02-6600, we affirm the district court’s order for t