Cases

Broderick, C.J. The defendant, Elias Smirnioudis, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Fauver, J.) awarding the plaintiff, General Linen Services, Inc. (General Linen), damages plus interest, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees for breach of contract. Smirnioudis challenges aspects of the damages award. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. *442

*189 ORDER LANDYA McCAFFERTY, District Judge. General Linen Service, Inc. brings suit against General Linen Service Co., Inc., asserting various state law claims and a claim under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Defendant asserts five counterclaims, seeking cancellation of the plaintiffs trademark (Counts I and II) and alleging claims for

ORDER GARY R. BROWN, United State Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Angel Dilonez, along with opt-in plaintiffs Aura Bueno, Carlos Dilone, and Norberto Bueno (collectively, “plaintiffs”), bring this action against their former employer, Fox Linen Service, Inc. (“Fox Linen”) and owner George Sundel (collectively, “defendants”). Plaintiffs, who were employed by defendants, allege that defendants violated

Dreben, J. After a trial in the Superior Court on the plaintiffs claims and the defendants’ counterclaims, a jury found for the plaintiff in quantum memit and for the defendants for breach of contract and violation of G. L. c. 93A, § 11. The jury also *64found the plaintiff’s actions wilful or knowing and, pursuant to a special question asking what multiplier is appropriate

HORTON, Justice. Barbara Kelly appeals an Industrial Commission decision. Kelly sustained injuries in an automobile accident when returning home from an Independent Medical Evaluation (IME) scheduled by the Idaho State Insurance Fund (Surety) in connection with an earlier industrial accident. The Commission concluded that Kelly’s injuries were not compensable because they did no

USCA11 Case: 20-11736 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-11736 ____________________ KEITH STANSELL, MARC GONSALVES, THOMAS HOWES, JUDITH JANIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Greer Jan

763 A.2d 858 (2000) Bette SEHL and Carl Sehl, h/w, Appellants, v. VISTA LINEN RENTAL SERV. INC. and Delaware Valley Linen Service, Inc., t/a D.C.L. and/or Delaware County Linen, Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 16, 1999. Filed November 6, 2000. Reargument Denied January 4, 2001. *860 Rub

729 F.Supp.2d 757 (2010) Abdul K. TAWWAAB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VIRGINIA LINEN SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. AW-09-00553. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. July 28, 2010. *764 Anthony Herman, Courtney Roberts Forrest, Skye Lynn Perryman, Covington and Burling, LLP, Emily Brittai

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0252p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MANN CONSTRUCTION, INC.; BROOK WOOD; │ KIMBERLY WOOD; LEE COUGHLIN;

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On October 13, 2015, Plaintiff Ronald Densmore commenced this action, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, against his former employer Mission Linen Supply (“Mission”) and Does 1-20, inclusive, in Fresno County S

OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in PART, and Plaintiffs state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Foster was employed by Defendan

Case: 15-11912 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 1 of 44 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11912 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cv-00355-MCR-

Case: 15-11912 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 1 of 43 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11912 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cv-00355-MCR-

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, § 43(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), provides: “A person shall be liable ... by the owner of a mark *771 ... if ... that person ... has a bad faith intent to profit from that mark ...; and ... registers, traffics in,

OPINION MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Paul Dunkel, Marlin Addison, Latrice Allen, Michael Andiorio, Thomas Ez-equiel, Bryan Franklin, Keith Kozlesky, Paul Ramsey, Terry Ramsey, et al. (“Plaintiffs”), brought this civil action to recover unpaid overtime on behalf of themselves and other allegedly similarly situated employees of Warrior Energy Services Corporation (“Warrior”) and In

ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Home Design Services, Inc. (“Home Design”) filed this suit against Defendants for copyright infringement of an architectural home design titled “HDS-2089,” claiming that Defendants built 165 infringing homes as part of their “Lau*1205rent” and “Dakota” designs based on slightly modified

FILED September 23, 2015 TICOURTOF WORKERS ' C O~IPI:X SATIO:>i

Hicks, J. The plaintiff, Signal Aviation Services, Inc. (Signal), appeals a ruling of the Superior Court (Bornstein, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, City of Lebanon (City), in this action by Signal for, among other things, breach of contract. The City cross-appeals a portion of the trial court

ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Julie Tassler was shot and killed by her estranged husband in the parking lot of her employer. The personal representative of Julie’s estate sought worker’s compensation benefits for her death. Julie’s employer and the South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation denied benefits. They ruled that Julie’s death did not “arise out of’ her employment. The ci