Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Superior Plus US Holdings Inc. v. Sunoco, Inc. (R & M)”
Cline v. Sunocopublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-7090 Document: 99-1 Date Filed: 11/17/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH November 17, 2025
Roy R. Damon and Eleanor M. Damon v. Sun Company, Inc., Roy R. Damon and Eleanor M. Damon v. Sun Company, Inc.public domain
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs brought suit in this case claiming misrepresentation and violation of Mass. Gen.L. ch. 93A, § 11. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the decision of the district court. BACKGROUND The parties stipulated to the following facts: Defendant Sun Oil Company, Inc. (R & M) (“Sun”) owned p
Wilson v. Circle K Stores, Inc.public domain
ORDER These matters are before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc filed by appellants Alkon, Frank, Holyoak, Martin, and Schulman in number 15-3228. Upon consideration, the panel grants in part, and only to the extent of the modifications contained in the attached revised Opinion, that part of the request seeking panel rehearing. The Opinion filed on August 23, 2017, is hereby withdrawn, and s
Cessna v. Rea Energy Cooperative, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KIM R. GIBSON; UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On December 31, 2015, Leonard Cessna and George Work filed this case in the Court of .Common Pleas of Blair County against REA Energy Cooperative, Inc. REA is an electric cooperative of which Cessna and Work (“Plaintiffs”) are current and former members, respectively — meaning REA is and was their electricity supplier. Plaintiffs seek to repre
Gomez v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Order, and, in the Alternative, Motion to Amend Class Definition, Filing No. 338, and *399on the defendant’s Motion to Decertify, Filing No. 417.1 1. Plaintiffs’
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LVI GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12067-VCG ) NCM GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, ) SUBHAS KHARA, EVERGREEN ) PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P., ) EVERGREEN PACIFIC PARTNERS ) GP, LLC, EVERGREEN PACIFIC ) PARTNERS I
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LVI GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12067-VCG ) NCM GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, ) SUBHAS KHARA, EVERGREEN ) PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P., ) EVERGREEN PACIFIC PARTNERS ) GP, LLC, EVERGREEN PACIFIC ) PARTNERS I
Five Star Bank v. Chipego, M.public domain
J-A19029-23 2024 PA Super 46 FIVE STAR BANK AND FINANCIAL : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF INSTITUTIONS, INC., : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : : v. :
Five Star Bank v. Chipego, M.public domain
J-A19029-23 2024 PA Super 46 FIVE STAR BANK AND FINANCIAL : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF INSTITUTIONS, INC., : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : : v. :
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:36 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.public domain
503 F.Supp.2d 490 (2007) OBG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP., as successor in interest to TRW, Inc., and Best Friends, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:06cv1850 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 30, 2007. *491 *492
Weinberg v. Sun Company, Inc.public domain
CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus: ¶ 1 Before us is the trial court’s denial of a motion for a class certification under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1702. The underlying action is predicated upon Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL), 73 *1155P.S. §§ 201-1-201-9.3.2 Appellants have proposed
Damon v. Sun Company, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 95-1820 ROY R. DAMON AND ELEANOR M. DAMON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SUN COMPANY, INC., Defendant - Appellee. No. 95-1821 ROY R. DAMON AND ELEANOR M. DAMON,
Damon v. Sun Company, Inc.public domain
USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-1820 ROY R. DAMON AND ELEANOR M. DAMON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. <
Huffman v. Comm'rpublic domain
OPINION Halpern, Judge: These cases have been consolidated for purposes of trial, briefing, and opinion. By notices of deficiency dated December 19, 2003 (the notices), respondent determined deficiencies in Federal income taxes as follows: Taxable (calendar) year deficiency Petitioners (h
Midwest Petroleum Co. v. American Petrofina, Inc.public domain
603 F.Supp. 1099 (1985) MIDWEST PETROLEUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN PETROFINA, INCORPORATED, and American Petrofina Marketing, Inc., Defendants. No. 83-93C(1). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. March 5, 1985. *1100 *1101 *1102
HSBC Bank v. Donaghy, A.public domain
OPINION BY STABILE, J.: Appellant Amy C. Donaghy appeals from the judgment entered September 6, 2013, following the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County’s (trial court) grant of Appellee HSBC Bank, NA as trustee’s motion for summary judgment in this in rem mortgage foreclosure action. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and r
Blus v. Civista Bankpublic domain
[Cite as Blus v. Civista Bank, 2025-Ohio-3303.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Kathleen Blus, et al. Court of Appeals No. E-24-029/E-24-030 Appellant Trial Court No. 2022CV0094/2023CV0070 v. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Civista Bank
Vail v. Stringpublic domain
[Cite as Vail v. String, 2019-Ohio-984.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 107112 ELIZABETH A. VAIL PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/
In re: REMICADE v.public domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-3567 ________________ IN RE: REMICADE (DIRECT PURCHASER) ANTITRUST LITIGATION JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC., Appellants ____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court