Cases

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 97-2047 ANN WARDER, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, and NANCY ANN MIN DePARLE, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE HEALT

CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal relates to the classification, for Medicare Part B reimbursement purposes, of medical equipment made for persons suffering from severe musculoskeletal problems. Produced by Appellees OrthoConeepts and used by Appellee Warder, the equipment consists of braces, fitted to the individual patient, on a wheeled base. The district court upheld

Cole, J. 1. Promissory note: compromise. I. At the request of plaintiff’s counsel the court instructed the jury, “that it is a sufficient consideration to support a note, to show that it was given to settle a claim and avoid litigation.” This is not the law. A note given, before a suit brought, to settle an illegal or wholly unfounded claim, has not sufficient consideration to support

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiffs RA Global Services, Inc. f/k/a RealAmerica Co. (“RA Global”) and George E. Burch III (“Burch” and together with RA Global, “plaintiffs”) bring this diversity action against defendants Avicenna Overseas Corp., Hüseyin Gün, Todd Peterson, and Nixon Peabody LLP (“Nixon”), seeking damages and a declaratory judgment. Presently before the Cour

445 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2006) VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. No. C-04-0651 EMC. (Docket Nos. 166, 168, and 177). United States District Court, N.D. California. August 4, 2006. *1105 Ronald S. Katz, Greg Travis Warder, Robert D. Becker, Shawn G. Hansen, Eugene L. Hahm, Manatt, Phelps & Phil

413 F.Supp.2d 1073 (2006) VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Defendant. No. C 04-0651 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 7, 2006. *1074 *1075 *1076 Ronald S. Katz, Greg Travis Warder, Robert D. Becker, Shaw

Matter of Lost Lake Holdings LLC v Hogue (2024 NY Slip Op 05266) Matter of Lost Lake Holdings LLC v Hogue 2024 NY Slip Op 05266 Decided on October 24, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

Matter of Liu v State of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 01279) Matter of Liu v State of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 01279 Decided on February 21, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

[Cite as State v. Brock, 2019-Ohio-3116.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2018-CA-102 : v.

Determination of respondent Department of Motor Vehicles, dated July 12, 2004, finding that petitioner made an illegal U-turn in violation of Ve*241hiele and Traffic Law § 1110 (a), and imposing a penalty of two points on her license and a fine of $70, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1615 NEW HAMPSHIRE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION; MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; LRGHEALTHCARE; SPEARE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; VALLEY REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. ALEX AZAR, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services;* CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES; SEEMA VERMA, in her official cap

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. *66When hospitals treat Medicaid patients, the Medicaid payments received from the government often do not cover the full costs of care. In 1981, Congress authorized the payment of additional sums to lessen the burden on hospitals that treat a high number of indigent patients. Years later, concerned that this payment adju

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful expulsion from a social club, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 13, 1998, which denied his motion for leave to amend the complaint and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff, James Caposella, alleg

—Determination of respondent Department of Consumer Affairs, dated June 29, 1998, which found petitioner in violation of title 20 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York and title 6 of the Rules of the City of New York and thereupon revoked petitioner’s home improvement contractor license and ordered it to make restitution in the amount of $34,777.39 and pay fines totaling $400, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brough

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated July 24, 1995, which adopted the findings of a Hearing Officer which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of five specifications of misconduct and terminated her employment with the Suffolk County Police Department. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DUNCAN joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge. In this case we consider the “statutory mootness” of an appeal challenging a bankruptcy court’s authorization of the assumption and sale of an oil and gas lease. Section 363(m) of th

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-739V (to be published) ************************* Chief Special Master Corcoran JEFFERY BELLO and OKSANA Y. * OGANESOV, parents of C.J.B., a minor, * * Filed: September 10,

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Suffolk County Department of Civil Service, dated April 8, 1998, which, after a hearing, revoked the petitioner’s certification and appointment as a Police Officer in the Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor and terminated his employment. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursemen

CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-739V (to be published) ************************* Chief Special Master Corcoran JEFFREY BELLO and OKSANA Y. * OGANESOV, parents of C.J.B., a minor, *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL- DENVER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 10-1356 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. MEMO