Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sullivan v. KB Home”
KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurancepublic domain
OPINION CATTANI, Judge. ¶ 1 KB Home Tucson, Inc. (“KB”) appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company and Travelers Property Casual Insurance Company (collectively, “Charter Oak”) on KB’s claims for declaratory relief, breach of contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. KB also ap
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 07-0815 ════════════
Justice WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice GREEN, and Justice JOHNSON joined. This breach-of-contract case poses a straightforward question: What does “prevailing party” mean? We have construed this phrase in a discretionary fee-*652award statute1
Sullivan v. North River Insurancepublic domain
606 N.W.2d 383 (1999) 238 Mich. App. 433 Nancy SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Crum & Forster Insurance, Defendant. Docket No. 204366. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted August 10, 1999, at Detroit. Decided November 5, 1999, at 9:20 a.m. Released for P
Hammer v. Phoenixpublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE HAMMER HOMES, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 23-0114 FILED 12-21-2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2021-019100 The Honorable John R
Derek Kudson v. Monique Drobnakpublic domain
CIKLIN, J. Derek Knudson (“father”) appeals from an order modifying child support. He raises multiple issues on appeal, only one of which warrants reversal. The father asserts that the trial court’s calculation of arrearages erroneously included childcare costs not actually incurred by Monique Drobnak (“mother”). Because the record confirms the father’s contention, we reverse an
Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Robertspublic domain
*402Opinion and Order by Special Justice DENNIS REPENNING. A litany of words and phrases may be used to describe the long journey of this disciplinary case and the factual backstory preceding it, but words like “swiftness,” “celerity,” “dispatch,” or “alacrity” are not included in the lexicon. This disciplinary proceeding and the facts giving rise to it
Chan v. Wupublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA BETTY CHAN; AND ASIAN No. 82208 AMERICAN REALTY & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, FILF vs. WAYNE WU; JUDITH SULLIVAN; SEP 1 5 2022 NEVADA REAL ESTATE CORP.; AND ELIZADET
KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Hardinpublic domain
219 S.W.3d 188 (2007) KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant, v. J. Thomas HARDIN, Respondent. No. 2006-SC-000268-KB. Supreme Court of Kentucky. April 19, 2007. As Modified April 25, 2007. OPINION AND ORDER OF RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) has moved this Court under SCR 3.435 to impose reciprocal discipli
Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Steinerpublic domain
157 S.W.3d 209 (2005) KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Jack W. STEINER, Jr. KBA Member No. 67445, Respondent. No. 2004-SC-000909-KB. Supreme Court of Kentucky. March 17, 2005. *210 OPINION AND ORDER Jack W. Steiner, Jr., engaged in the practice of law in this Commonwealth from 1982 through February 2002
United States ex rel. United States Attorneys for the Eastern & Western Districts of Kentucky v. Kentucky Bar Ass'npublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice MINTON. “[Ojurs is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials[J”1 Plea *140bargaining is “not some adjunct to the criminal justice system; it is the criminal justice system.”2 The pervasiveness of plea bargain agreements in the Cour
Taylor v. Fergusonpublic domain
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. The homeowners, Bryan and Tina Ferguson, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren County denying their motion to set aside the default judgment obtained against them by the plaintiff, Brent Taylor, in his action to quiet title to certain real property. Because the homeowners’ motion to set aside the default judgment and supporting documents averred a prima facie basis f
S.K.B.-G. ex rel. J.P.G. v. A.M.G.public domain
SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. Introduction A.M.G. (Mother) appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of Paternity, Child Custody and Support (Judgment) awarding her and J.P.G. (Father) joint legal and physical custody of S.KB.-G. (Child). We affirm as modified. Factual and Procedural Background On October 30, 2015, Father filed a Peti
S.K.B.-G. ex rel. J.P.G. v. A.M.G.public domain
SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. Introduction A.M.G. (Mother) appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of Paternity, Child Custody and Support (Judgment) awarding her and J.P.G. (Father) joint legal and physical custody of S.KB.-G. (Child). We affirm as modified. Factual and Procedural Background On October 30, 2015, Father filed a Peti
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0339 ══════════ Webb Consolidated Independent School District, Petitioner, v. Robert Marshall and Amy Marshall, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for th
Christie Lynn Terrell v. Rashin Mazaheripublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00060-CV Christie Lynn TERRELL, Appellant v. Rashin MAZAHERI,
Bryan v. Erie County Office of Children & Youthpublic domain
*318 OPINION FUENTES, Circuit Judge. In the midst of trial in the District Court, the parties agreed to a high-low settlement. Regardless of the verdict, the Bryan family was to receive at least $900,000. And regardless of the verdict, defendants Cindy Baxter and Renie Skal-ko were
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.public domain
OPINION JONES, Judge: ¶ 1 The City appeals the trial court’s orders: (1) dismissing its third-party complaint against Appellees because it was not brought within the eight-year period of repose set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 12-552(A), 1 and (2) awarding certain Appellees
Cooke v. Murphypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § CHRISTOPHER J. COOKE, JR. § and CONSTANTINE KOUTOUFARIS, § No. 687, 2013 § Plaintiffs Below- § Appellants, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for Kent Co
People v. Verdugopublic domain
Filed 1/15/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, B296630 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA245638-03) v. NICK VERDUGO, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ronald S.