Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sullivan v. Ideal Plumbing, Inc.”
Sullivan v. Baptist Memorial Hospitalpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON FILED FOR PUBLICATION July 12, 1999 Filed: July 12, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. KAREN SULLIVAN, )
Sullivan v. Baptist Memorial Hospitalpublic domain
995 S.W.2d 569 (1999) Karen SULLIVAN, Appellee, v. BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Appellant. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. July 12, 1999. *570 Paul E. Prather, Steven W. Likens, Kiesewetter, Wise, Kaplan, Schwimmer & Prather, PLC, Memphis, for Appellant. Stephen H. Biller, Sara L. Hall, Memphis, for Appellee. OPIN
C.H. v. Sullivanpublic domain
718 F.Supp. 726 (1989) C.H., et al., federal witnesses v. Warden SULLIVAN, et al. T.S., federal witness v. Edwin MEESE, III, et al. John SMITH v. Edwin MEESE. Civ. Nos. 5-86-237, 5-86-368 and 5-87-79. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division. July 25, 1989. *727 Melvin B. Goldberg, St. Pa
Productive MD, LLC v. Aetna Health, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are several motions filed by defendants Aetna Health, Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company, Inc. (collectively, “Aetna”) and by the plaintiff, Productive MD, LLC (“Productive MD”). Aetna has filed a Partial Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 108) (“Motion to Dismiss ERISA-Governed Claims
FREEDOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. Coronadopublic domain
296 S.W.3d 790 (2009) FREEDOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a the Brownsville Herald and the Valley Morning Star, Appellant, v. Juan Antonio CORONADO, et al., Appellees. No. 13-08-00628-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. August 14, 2009. *793 Brian G. Janis, Brownsville, John A. Bussian, III, Raleigh, NC, Christin
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
Denise Stroup, as Legal Guardian of D. L. S., an Incapacitated Person v. MRM Management, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-17-00534-CV 21540047 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Fox ex rel. Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc. v. Koplik (In re Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc.)public domain
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER TRIAL (AS AMENDED)1 ROBERT E. GERBER, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction. .753 Background. 756 H The Revolver . 756 03 The Trade Insurance. 757 00 The American Tissue Extensions of Credit. 757 ^ (a) Overview . 757 (b) Particular Transactions
Lane v. Random House, Inc.public domain
985 F.Supp. 141 (1995) Mark LANE, Plaintiff, v. RANDOM HOUSE, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 93-2564 RCL. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 26, 1995. *142 *143 *144 Mark L. Davidson, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Henry S. Hobe
Minichillo v. Robert Cook & Sons, Inc.public domain
Butler, J. INTRODUCTION This is a dispute between a masonry subcontractor and a general contractor. The masonry subcontractor brought suit in Middlesex County on April 14, 1988, under G.L.c. 149, §29 to collect monies allegedly due under a written subcontract and various change orders on a public works project. In addition to the claim under G.L.c. 149, §29, plaintiff seeks damages and other relief pursuan
953 F.Supp. 617 (1997) YEAGER'S FUEL, INC., et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY. LOSCH BOILER SALES & SERVICE COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY. Civil Action Nos. 91-5176, 92-2359. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 31, 1997. *618 *61
Uniroyal, Inc. v. Home Insurancepublic domain
707 F.Supp. 1368 (1988) UNIROYAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. The HOME INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants. No. CV-84-3999 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 19, 1988. *1369 Joseph Ferraro, Myron Kalish, Bruce A. Hecker, Shea & Gould, New York City, for plaintiff Uniroyal, Inc. Sheila L. Birnbaum, Irene
O'CAIN v. Harvey Freeman and Sons, Inc.public domain
603 So.2d 824 (1991) Elizabeth O'CAIN v. HARVEY FREEMAN AND SONS, INC. of Mississippi. No. 07-CA-59446. Supreme Court of Mississippi. Decided December 18, 1991. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1992. *825 Jack C. Pickett, Margaret P. Ellis, Kitchens & Ellis, Pascagoula, for appellant. James H. Heidelberg, Bry
774 F.Supp. 1467 (1991) MERCHANT & EVANS, INC. v. ROOSEVELT BUILDING PRODUCTS CO., INC. Civ. A. No. 90-7973. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 16, 1991. As Amended October 4, 1991. *1468 *1469 Steven R. Waxman, Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel,
McQuay-Perfex, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.public domain
128 Wis.2d 231 (1985) 381 N.W.2d 587 McQUAY-PERFEX, INC., and Johnson Controls, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. WISCONSIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.[] No. 84-2243. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs November 11, 1985. Decided December 12, 1985. For the defendant-appellant the cause wa
Abernathy v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.public domain
ORDER ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge. This is an action brought under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, by 261 optometrists from ten states. These plaintiffs have sued defendants Bausch and Lomb Inc., Pearle Vision Centers, Inc., G.D. Searle and Co., and Cole National Corp., for alleged violations of the antitrust laws. The plaintiffs, already large in number, seek to pursue their claim as a c
Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of Patersonpublic domain
83 N.J. 212 (1980) 416 A.2d 334 DOME REALTY, INC., FARGO REALTY, INC., GRAY REALTY, INC., ZOOM REALTY, INC., KEEN REALTY, INC., STONE REALTY, INC., MEYER LOBSENZ AND THEODORE A. LOBSENZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF PATERSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE PATERSON DIVISION OF COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. <
572 F.Supp. 1300 (1983) SOCIETY FOR GOOD WILL TO RETARDED CHILDREN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mario M. CUOMO, as Governor of the State of New York, et al., Defendants. No. 78-Civ.-1847. United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 10, 1983. *1301 *1302 Murray B. Schneps, Michael S. L
Automatic Laundry Service, Inc. v. Demaspublic domain
216 Md. 544 (1958) 141 A.2d 497 AUTOMATIC LAUNDRY SERVICE, INC. v. DEMAS ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS IDEAL TRAILER CAMPS [No. 165, September Term, 1957.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 10, 1958. *546 The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ., and BO
638 F.2d 283 Neil LEIST, Philip Smith and Incomco, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.John Richard SIMPLOT, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot ProductsCo., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc.,Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack,Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, GeraldRafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, StephenSundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc.,