Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Pei-Yu Yang appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in an adversary proceeding brought by the bankruptcy trustee Richard Alan Marshack alleging that debtor Yan Sui fraudulently transferred his interest in real property to Yang. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, Conlon v. United States, 474 F.3d 616, 621 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

Opinion IKOLA, J. Plaintiff Yan Sui appeals from the judgment dismissing with prejudice his action against defendants Stephen D. Price and 2176 Pacific Homeowners Association after the court sustained without leave to amend defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. The court ruled the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and could not be fixed. We affirm.

Parker, J. This is an action hy the plaintiffs, Delanty and others, upon a contract of marine insurance whereby the defendant insurance association insured the tugboat “Bear” “for account of concerned”; that is, for the account and benefit of Tacoma Dredging Company, it having then the use and possession of the boat under a lease contract with the plaintiffs as owners thereof. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for Gra

On December 9, 1988, Nancy Hung backed her car across the parking lot from a parking space, over a six-inch curb, across a sidewalk, and through the wall of the Panda Chinese Restaurant ("Panda Restaurant") in Huntsville, Alabama. Crystal Lynn Albert, a 10-year-old girl, was struck by the car; she was seated inside the restaurant, approximately one to two feet from the exterior wall and window. When the car stopped, about one-half of the trunk was located inside the restaurant. On Dec

Millard v Wyche (2018 NY Slip Op 05838) Millard v Wyche 2018 NY Slip Op 05838 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

22-6421(L) Garcia Pinach v. Bondi In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 Nos. 22-6421 (L), 24-26 (CON) JOAQUIN GARCIA PINACH, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GE

2021 IL App (2d) 190833 No. 2-19-0833 Opinion filed February 22, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE O

CHIN, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Edson Flores, a native and citizen of Honduras, seeks review of a May 22, 2012 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming a January 6, 2012 decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The agency denied Flores’s motion to continue removal proceedings, which Flores had filed to pursue adjustment of status on the basis of two family-based visa petitions. The agency also found that Fl

167 Cal.App.4th 681 (2008) OMOTAYO FASUYI, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PERMATEX, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. A117760. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. October 15, 2008. *684 Poole & Shaffery, John Shaffery, Karl Kime and Rey S. Yang for Defendant and Appellant. Hooy & Hooy and R

890 P.2d 291 (1995) 78 Hawai`i 54 STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herbert Sui Ung LAU, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Stanley MYERS, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa KANESHIRO, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tadao SEKI, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appel

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting. *111The Court bases today's holding almost entirely on Great Northern R. Co. v. United States, 315 U.S. 262, 271,

12‐2406 Flores v. Holder UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2014 (Argued: December 5, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2015)

22-6021 Alvarez v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 22-6021 CARLOS ANIBAL ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. ______

WINTER, Circuit Judge dissenting: I respectfully dissent. This ease is the arbitration counterpart to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 546 U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2541, 180 L.Ed.2d 374, 2011 WL 2437013 (June 20, 2011). As in Wal-Mart, the class action complaint filed *128by appellants in the Southern District, followed by

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-3908 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLARENCE GROGG, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southe

534 F.3d 807 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence GROGG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3908. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued June 6, 2008. Decided July 28, 2008. *809 William McCoskey (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-

1 F.3d 96 62 USLW 2089, 126 Lab.Cas. P 33,031,1 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d 956 Kam Shing CHAN, Kam Tai Chan, Jing Yi Chen, Shan Non Chiu,Bak Lok Chu, Kok Kun Chu, Israel Gonzalez, Sui Bin Huang,Jian Ning Jiang, Kam Fai Kwok, Moon Shuen Kwong, Wei XiangLee, Yang I Lee, Young Shi Lee, Bing Zhao Li, Hao Hui Li,Kei Man Li, Wai Tai Li, Chi Kwong Liu, Jack Ye Louie, ShengHua Lu, Tian Guang Mai, Cheuk Mi

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1890 Doc: 120 Filed: 05/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 67 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1890 TAMER MAHMOUD; ENAS BARAKAT; JEFF ROMAN; SVITLANA ROMAN; CHRIS PERSAK; MELISSA PERSAK, in their individual capacities and ex rel. their min

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) SHAKER AAMER (ISN 239), ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-2215 (RMC) ) BARACK H. OBAMA, 1 et al., )

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge In the six years since the Supreme Court restored the federal courts’ statutory habeas corpus jurisdiction over detainees at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the Judiciary has worked to map the contours of the Great Writ in these exceptional circumstances. In 2013, the D.C. Circuit decided that a military regulation providing for repatriat