Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2433 ___________________________ J.T.H.; H.D.H. Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Missouri Department of Social Services Children’s Division

Fletcher, Chief Justice. Cruz Sigala, Ligia Pacheco de Perez and other citizens of the Republic of Venezuela filed these wrongful death and personal injury actions against AT&T Corporation and its Atlanta employees as a result of a 1993 gas pipeline explosion in Venezuela. The defendants moved to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens, which the trial court denied due to the absence of statutory authority. We granted

Carley, Justice, dissenting. Under the applicable zoning ordinance of Spalding County, the denial by the Board of Appeals of an application for a variance is to be appealed by filing a petition for certiorari in the superior court. The majority holds that this ordinance is constitutional. In my opinion, the ordinance is unconstitutional and I must, therefore, respectfully dissent. It has lon

AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court are Defendants John Roach, Sr. and Christopher *658Milner's ("CCDAO Defendants") Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #17), Defendant Collin County, Texas' ("the County") Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #18), and Defendants

19-3970 Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLC United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2020 Argued: February 1, 2021 Decided: January 5, 2023 No. 19-3970 CHARLOTTE FREEMAN, for the Estate of BRIAN S. FREEMAN, KATHLEEN SNYDER, RANDOLPH FREEMAN,

718 A.2d 693 (1998) 123 Md. App. 456 Herbert HIMELFARB et al. v. The HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 61, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 5, 1998. *694 Benjamin A. Klopman (M. Michael Cramer and Cramer & Klopman, Chartered, on the brief), Rockville, for appellants.</

96 P.3d 1084 (2004) 208 Ariz. 597 Lionel DESILVA, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas BAKER and Jane Doe Baker, husband and wife; Baker & Baker, an Arizona partnership, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 03-0700. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. September 7, 2004. *1085 B

708 F.2d 1399 Steven Mark HOLLOMAN; Michael James Holloman; DavidEmerson, Jr.; and Jeffrey Todd Emerson; Minor,by his father and next friend, DavidEmerson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.James WATT, Secretary of the Department of Interior; ForestGirard, Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs;Sidney Mils, Acting Commissioner of the Bureau of IndianAffairs; United States Department of Interior; Bureau of

OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. This matter arises out of a mortgage fraud scheme that took place between April 1996 and June 1997. In the roughly fifteen years since the scheme — which involved multiple lawsuits and indictments— no one has quite gotten to the bottom of it. What remains are claims asserted by Plaintiff Walsh Securities, Inc. (“WSI”) against Defendants Commonwealth Lan

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2806 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE AT HAMILTON POINTE LLC, d/b/a Hamilton Pointe Health and Rehabilitation Center; d/b/a Hamilton Pointe Assisted Living Center; d/b/a The Cottages at Hamilton Pointe and TENDER LOV

ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Cristina Ramirez. (Doc. 24.) The briefing on that Motion has also produced a Motion to Strike. (Doc. 37.) The Court held oral argument on August 13, 2013. For reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part both Motions. BACKGROUND1 Ramirez has brought several tort claims ag

For prior appeal see Ivey v. Wiggins, 271 Ala. 610,126 So.2d 469. This is an appeal by plaintiff from judgment of non-suit induced by ruling of the trial court sustaining defendant's demurrer to the complaint. The controversy arises out of an alleged collision between two automobiles. Plaintiff is the administrator of a person alleged to have been riding in one of the automobiles and defendant is the a

Although legal remedies exist for the alleged wrongs committed by Electronic Data Systems (“EDS”) and its associated defendants for allegedly mismanaging the *303company’s 401 (k) Retirement Plan, the Rule 23(b)(1) or (b)(2) class action certified by the district court is not among them. The district court erroneously interpreted the impact, inter alia, of intraclass conflicts and fact-specific de

PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal‘from a judgment dismissing appellants’ complaint for defect of parties plaintiff and failure to join indispensable-parties defendant. The pleadings, exhibits, and uncontro-verted affidavits show that on August 15, 1951, Wells & Son Construction Co., a partnership composed of the defendants Cecil G. Wells and James A. Wells, entered into a joint venture with Lewis

The opinion of the court was delivered by Herd, J.: Three interlocutory appeals in medical malpractice suits have been consolidated for a determination of the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 60-3403 (hereafter 60-3403). In Farley v. Engelken, et al., Case No. 59,314, the district court of Pottawatomie County upheld the constitutionality of the statute and plaintiff has appealed. In the other cas

550 N.W.2d 739 (1996) 452 Mich. 171 Gina E. FRAME (now Stephens), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jay J. Franklin NEHLS, Defendant, and Stephen Nehls, Petitioner-Appellee. Docket No. 102139, Calendar No. 11. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued November 7, 1995. Decided July 3, 1996. *740 Miller,

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

236 F.2d 469 Milford S. PURCEL and Joseph A. Kane, Appellants,v.Cecil G. WELLS and James A. Wells, d/b/a Wells & SonConstruction Company; and American Surety Companyof New York, a corporation, Appellees. No. 5266. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Aug. 11, 1956.Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1956.

930 F.Supp. 1470 (1996) CLARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Federico PENA, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 95-D-447-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. April 18, 1996. *1471 *1472 *1473 *1

702 P.2d 631 (1985) Dean BLAKE, Appellant, v. Gary GILBERT and Haakon Olson, Appellees. No. S-344. Supreme Court of Alaska. July 5, 1985. *633 Kurt M. LeDoux, LeDoux & LeDoux, Kodiak, for appellant. Bernd C. Guetschow, Anchorage, for appellees. Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.