Cases

Opinion by JUDGE TAUBMAN T 1 Defendant, David I. Beren, appeals the trial court's judgment and order of costs in favor of plaintiff, Moye White LLP, denying, as relevant here, Beren's counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty. In addressing an issue of first impression, we conclude that a law firm does not have a fiduciary duty to disclose information about the medical and arrest history of one of its attorne

314 F.Supp.2d 451 (2004) Alfred ALBRECHT, Sr. v. Martin HORN, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections No. CIV.A.99-1479. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 21, 2004. *452 *453 *454 *455 B

383 F.Supp.2d 720 (2005) Lee BAKER, Petitioner, v. Martin HORN, et al., Respondents. No. Civ.A. 96-0037. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 15, 2005. *721 *722 *723 *724 Billy H. Nolas, Stuart B. Lev

Under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. § 1973c), a few states, including Alabama, are prevented from enforcing changes affecting voting practices without first obtaining approval from the Federal government. I believe that Justice Black was right when he dissented from the United States Supreme Court's upholding the validity of § 5 against constitutional attack in South Carolina v.Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301

PER CURIAM: The sole issue on appeal is whether the single-judge district court erred in determining that LULAC’s claim under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c (1994), is “wholly insubstantial” and, thus, undeserving of the attention of a three-judge court. Because we conclude that neither the legal nor the factual aspects of LULAC’s claim is wholly insubst

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-CA-00019-SCT ROBIN MEDLIN v. HAZLEHURST EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, EMCARE OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. a/k/a EMCARE, INC., WILLARD SPEED, JR., M.D., COPIAH MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, BRIAN TWEDT, M.D., PHILIP CRANSTON, M.D., AND ROBERT L. WALKER, M.D. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/25/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COPIAH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLA

520 U.S. 83 (1997) ADAMS et al. v. ROBERTSON et al. No. 95-1873. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 14, 1997. Decided March 3, 1997. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA *85 Norman E. Waldrop, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Stephen C. Olen, George M. Wa

71 F.Supp.2d 582 (1997) LAFAYETTE STEEL ERECTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROY ANDERSON CORP., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 1:96-CV-65RG. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. November 14, 1997. *583 *584 Mark Douglas Herbert, Todd I. Woods, McGlinchey Stafford, Jackson, MS, P

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 98-3451 ROBERT ST. PIERRE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ROGER D. COWAN, Warden, Menard Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 95 C 5040--Charles P. Kocoras, Judge. Argued March 22, 1999--Decided June 28, 2000 Before Bauer, Flaum, and Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judges. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. Robert St. Pier

883 F.2d 196 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 73,023, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,547,RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7281 Samuel B. McCARTER, First Seneca Bank & Trust Co., and AllanLevine, co-executors of the Estate of Dr. LeoLevine, and Olive M. Heck, Appellants,v.Merle B. MITCHAM, Butcher & Singer, Inc., and ThomasGabreski, Appellees. No. 88-3654. United States C

*374Levin, J. (concurring in Burns, and partially dissenting in Tebo). We agree that this Court’s decision in Putney v Haskins, 414 Mich 181; 324 NW2d 729 (1982), should be applied prospectively, and therefore concur in Burns and to that ex

512 U.S. 874 (1994) HOLDER, individually and in his official capacity as County Commissioner for Bleckley County, Georgia, et al. v. HALL et al. No. 91-2012. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 4, 1993. Decided June 30, 1994. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT *875 K