⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.25.5.117”

Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013-01-31 · Published · cited 41× · 62 A.3d 676; 2013 Del. Ch. LEXIS 34; 2013 WL 1092609
OPINION PARSONS, Vice Chancellor. This case addresses the allegations of a minority unitholder in a privately held medical device company. The unitholder is the co-founder and former CEO of the company. He became a minority stakeholder after accepting investments in the company in exchange for units and after he sold some of his own units. The company is managed by a board of directors under its limited liab
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2025 12:08 PM NO. 15-25-00102-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK
in Re: John Calcepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-18-00647-CV 05-18-00647-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 902 F. Supp. 2d 690; 2012 WL 4717893
MEMORANDUM RE: OUTSTANDING MOTIONS, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, AND BELLWETHER TRIAL BAYLSON, District Judge. In Verdi’s opera, A Masked Ball, the King is told that conspirators intend to kill him. Not knowing their names, the King consults the gypsy fortune teller, Ulrica, who gives him a clue as to the identity of one of the conspirators. In these cases, similar to many cases throughout the
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
FXLED XN court of Appeals No. 05-18-00868-CV MAR 4 2019 Lisa Matz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - l e - - r k - - - - ,5th District IN 1'HE COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH ~
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-06-05 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 5573168 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/5/2015 10:24:41 PM JEF
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL HIGGIN and MICHAEL ) MENNELLA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2022-0641-NAC THE HONORABLE ANTHONY J. ) ALBENCE, in his official capacity as ) State Election Commissioner,
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-04-24 · Published · cited 69× · 105 F. Supp. 3d 330; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54059; 2015 WL 1883201
OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs bring this putative class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Barclays PLC and Barclays Capital Inc. (collectively,-“Barclays”), and Robert Diamond, Antony Jenkins, Christopher Lucas, Tushar Mor-zaria, and William White (the “Individual Defendants” and, toge
Doe v. Cahillpublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005-10-05 · Published · cited 267× · 884 A.2d 451; 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2441; 2005 Del. LEXIS 381; 2005 WL 2455266
884 A.2d 451 (2005) John DOE No. 1, Movant Below, Appellant, v. Patrick CAHILL and Julia Cahill, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees. No. 266, 2005. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: September 7, 2005. Decided: October 5, 2005. David L. Finger of Finger & Slanina, L.L.C., Wilmington, DE, for appellant. Robert J. Katzenstein (argued) and Rober
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-06-27 · Published · cited 191× · 827 F.3d 262; 2016 WL 3513782
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Table of Contents I.Background... 267 . A. Internet Cookie Technology.. .268 B. Factual Allegations.. .268 C. Procedural History in the District Court.. .270 II. Arguments and Claims Forec
United States Tax Court · 2025-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Tax Court 164 T.C. No. 9 FACEBOOK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 21959-16. 1 Filed May 22, 2025. ————— O
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 493; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157930
SECTION: R ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is a securities class action brought on behalf of all persons who purchased ATP Oil & Gas Corporation’s common stock in the public market between December 16, 2010 and ATP’s bankruptcy filing on August 17, 2012 (“the Class Period”). Because it is in bankruptcy proceedings, ATP is not named as a
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-17-01421-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/30/2018 5:10 PM
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-04-21 · Published · cited 39× · 105 F. Supp. 3d 293; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63457; 2015 WL 2258098
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MICHAEL H. DOLINGER, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiffs Daryl K. Washington and Sunday Players, Inc. (“Sunday Players”) commenced- this lawsuit -against Kellwood Company (“Kellwood”), primarily asserting that Kellwood breached the terms of a November 2003 license agreement whereby Kellwood was to manufacture, promote, and distribute so-called compression
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
./ I-;:. LJ 0 This document contains some pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging. RECEIVED IN 0 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 30 2Ui5 n THE STATE OF TEXAS