⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Strange v. National Opinion Research Center”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 3× · 98 F.4th 646
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ___________ FILED April 16, 2024 No. 22-40328 ___________ Lyle W
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014-10-20 · Published · cited 0× · 33 F. Supp. 3d 1381; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 977; 2014 WL 5426891; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148662
OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. On August 4, 2014, the court issued an opinion on the merits of the plaintiffs’ constitutional claim against the staff-privileges requirement 'of Alabama’s Women’s Health and Safety Act, 1975 Ala.Code § 26-2SE-4(c). See Planned Parenthood S.E., Inc. v. Strange, 33 F.Supp.3d 1330, 2014 WL 3809403 (M.D.Ala.2014). Today, the court issues a supplemental opin
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014-08-04 · Published · cited 4× · 33 F. Supp. 3d 1330; 2014 WL 3809403; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106159
OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. In Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992), the Supreme Court of the United States announced two principles that must govern this court’s analysis of the right to choose to have an abortion. First, the Court reaffirmed “the right of the woman to choose to have an abortion before viability and to obta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH No. 24-1570 AND MANUFACTURERS OF D.C. No. AMERICA, 6:19-cv-01996- MO Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OPINION ANDREW R. STOLFI, in his official capacity as Director of the Ore
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 14× · 9 F. Supp. 3d 1272; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42876; 2014 WL 1320158
OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. This lawsuit challenges subsection 4(c) of HB 57, the Women’s Health and Safety Act, codified at 1975 Ala.Code § 26-23E-4(c). That statute would require all physicians who perform abortions at licensed abortion clinics within the State of Alabama to.obtain staff privileges at a local hospital. Plaintiffs Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc., Reproductive Health
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:17-cv-01425 (TNM) U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION We all wear masks now, but this case is about a different type o
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-11-09 · Published · cited 26× · 903 F. Supp. 2d 59; 2012 WL 5463662; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160718
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. This represents the latest phase in the Freedom of Information Act battle between Plaintiffs — the National Whistle-blower Center and six current and former employees of the Department of Health and Human Services — and Defendant HHS about access to records relating to th
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-04-29 · Published · cited 9× · 605 U.S. 1; 221 L. Ed. 2d 684; 145 S. Ct. 1262
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 605 U.S. 1
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–37 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT April 29, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 22-cv-3319 (CRC) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In early 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush was the presumptive favorite to become the next Republ
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-12-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-821 (Filed: 13 December 2022) * ************************************** INGHAM REG. MED. CENTER, * n/k/a MCLAREN GREATER LANSING, * et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Breach of Contract; Mutual Mistake of Fact;
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 598 U.S. 356
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-05-11 · Published · cited 24× · 598 U.S. 356
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016-10-27 · Published · cited 10× · 217 F. Supp. 3d 1313; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149251; 2016 WL 6395904
OPINION Myron H. Thompson, United States District Judge Providers of abortion and other reproductive-health services in Alabama challenge two 2016 state statutes that regulate abortions and abortion clinics. The first statute, which the court will call the “school-proximity law,” provides that the Alabama Department of Public Health may not issue or renew licenses to abortion clinics located within 2,0
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
7/23/2021 3:54:57 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-1257.pdf 19-1257_new.pdf versus 85 pages (645 KB) 85 pages (685 KB)
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-07-01 · Published · cited 100× · 594 U.S. 647; 210 L. Ed. 2d 753; 141 S. Ct. 2321
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-05-11 · Published · cited 112× · 598 U.S. 356
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 356–410 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 11, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010-02-01 · Published · cited 4× · 698 F. Supp. 2d 1081; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30932; 2010 WL 1140714
698 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2010) Chad Leroy LISDAHL, Plaintiff, v. MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, d/b/a Mayo Medical Transport, a/k/a Gold Cross Ambulance, and David B. Johnson, individually, Defendants. Civ. No. 07-3708 (RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 1, 2010. *1083 George C. Aucoin, The
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) JENNIFER BRADLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-346 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-09-10 · Published · cited 5× · 14 F.4th 409
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0215p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MEMPHIS CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; │ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNE