Cases

In the Matter of the Dissolution of 47th Road LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company. 705060/16 For Petitioner:Michael L. Cirrito, Esq.White, Cirrito & Nally, LLPHempstead, New York 11550For Respondent:James Costo, Esq.New York, New York 10007

Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Contents I. Introduction...368 *368II. Settlement...369 III. Law...370 A. American's with Disabilities Act...370 B. Quasi-Class Action...371 C. Settlement Standard of Review...372

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this copyright infringement action filed by Plaintiff, Dominick Ranieri, d/b/a Dominick Ranieri Architect, P.C. (“Plaintiff’) against the above captioned entities and individuals (“Defendants”), are the following four motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56: (1) Plaintiffs motion for

*595 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Chief Judge. The numerous plaintiffs in these four adversary proceedings each signed a purchase agreement to buy units in a hotel-condominium project developed by the debtor, Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC.1 The buyers no longer wan

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Gander Mountain Company (“plaintiff’ or “Gander Mountain”) commenced the within action seeking monetary damages, declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against defendant Islip U-slip LLC (“defendant”). Presently before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint in its entirety p

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, Sr. United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff Hamilton Group Funding, Inc.'s, Motion For Summary Judgment On Liability (DE 31) and Defendant Gerard Anthony Basel's Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 33). The Court has carefully reviewed said Motions, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. In the above-styled cause, Plaintiff Hamilton Gro

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN GURNEY-GOLDMAN, as ) Executor of the Estate of Allan H. Goldman, ) and AMY GOLDMAN FOWLER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1124-JTL ) JANE H. GOLDMAN,

CARNES, Circuit Judge: This case involves an insurance coverage dispute arising in Florida, the proper resolution of which depends on unsettled state law. The answers to the state law questions at the core of the case are sufficiently unclear and difficult that we think the proper course is to certify them to the Florida Supreme Court, which can provide authoritative answers. <

KOBLITZ, P.J.A.D. *941*176Plaintiff Casino Reinvestment Development Authority (CRDA) appeals from the August 5, 2016 dismissal of its complaint for condemnation of a residential property in the city of Atlantic City owned by defendants Charles and Lucind

611 F.Supp.2d 203 (2009) ARUBA HOTEL ENTERPRISES N.V., Plaintiff, v. Michael BELFONTI, MCR Property Management Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-1297 (JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 26, 2009. *205 Lissa J. Paris, Murtha Cullina LLP, Hartford, CT, Michael T. Mervis, Patrick J. Dempsey, Richard

M. Floyd Bailey, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of James H. Faulkner III in Faulkner's action against Bailey arising out of a consensual, sexual relationship between Bailey and Paris Faulkner, who, at the time of that relationship, was Faulkner's wife. We reverse and remand. I. Factual Background In December 1999, the Faulkners were attending the Dalraida Church of Christ in Montgomery ("Dalraida"). Bailey, who has a b

22-1783 Trustees of the NYSNAPP v. White Oak Glob. Adv. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ________________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: October 25, 2023 Decided: May 21, 2024 Docket No. 22-1783 _________________________________________ THE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW Y

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the bench trial held on May 24 and 25, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear the Plaintiffs’ lawsuit when Plaintiff Diana Coffey’s administrative claim did not spe*1121cifical

985 So.2d 1036 (2008) ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mercedes ZOTA, et al., Appellees. No. SC06-2031. Supreme Court of Florida. June 26, 2008. *1038 Douglas M. McIntosh and Robert C. Weill of McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz and Cartaya, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant. Matthew D. Weissing of Rothstein Rosenfeldt A

Wesley, Circuit Judge: *91 These eighty-eight consolidated appeals arise from the ongoing fallout of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme. As alleged, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("Madoff Securities") fraudulently transferred billions of dollars to foreign investors, including the fe

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A pipeline operator challenges a local ordinance prohibiting loading crude oil onto tankers and the construction of new structures for that purpose on the grounds that it violates the dormant Commerce Clause and Foreign Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. A state or local statute can violate the dormant Commerce Clause if it (1) has an impermissible extraterritorial

180 Cal.App.4th 56 (2009) CECELIA McCOY, as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. M. DOUGLAS GUSTAFSON et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. H030724. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. December 15, 2009. *62 Kathleen M. Clack for Plaintiff and Appellant. Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Gary L. Wollberg and

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0019-16T1 CASINO REINVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION a public corporate body of the February 15, 2019 State of New Jersey,

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00043-CV ___________________________ CORNELIUS JOE ERGONIS AND LINDA ANN ERGONIS, Appellants V. WILLIAM THOMAS SULTZBAUGH, SHARON ELLIOTT SULTZBAUGH A/K/A SHARON CARR, EBBY HALLIDAY REAL ESTATE, INC., KATHY GIBSO