Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Storm v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.”
The YORK GROUP, INC. v. Horizon Casket Group, Inc.public domain
459 F.Supp.2d 567 (2006) The YORK GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. HORIZON CASKET GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-05-2181. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 13, 2006. *568 *569 Jeffrey Roger Parsons, David Alan Walton, W. Michael Scott, Beirne Ma
Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. Balentinepublic domain
693 F.Supp.2d 681 (2010) RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. James Darren BALENTINE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-cv-3167. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 16, 2010. *683 David Allen Ward, Jr., The Ward Law Firm, The Woodlands, TX, for Plaintiff. Larry E. Demmons, Tag
MEMORANDUM JOSEPH L. TAURO, District Judge. This matter came before the court on March 11, 2011 for a Final Fairness Hearing considering the approval of a proposed settlement of these consolidated class action cases, all pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(e) (the “Fairness Hearing”). PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 24, 2010, 2010 WL 3810625, this court is
ACCEPTED 03-16-00718-CV 14585383
Lehman Bros. Special Financing Inc. v. Bank of America National Ass'n (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Shield Securities Limited (“Shield”) in the above-captioned adversary proceeding brought by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“LBSF”). Shield takes the position that this Court has neither in personam jurisdiction nor in rem jurisdiction to resolve this adversary pro
Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of No. 22-15815 himself and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 06269-PJH v. OPINION SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the U
OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge. Table of Contents I. Background... 537 A. Summary of CHF LIBOR... 537 B. Relationship between CHF LIBOR and Swiss Franc Derivatives.. .537 C. The Parties and the Types of Swiss Franc Deriv
144 F.3d 1249 49 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 740, 98 Cal. Daily Op.Serv. 4048,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5612UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Richard KLIMAVICIUS-VILORIA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Oscar CAICEDO-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Edilberto FERRARO-MONTESDEOCA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americ
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
OPINION Opinion by Justice MYERS. Bob Montgomery Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a Bob Montgomery Collision appeals the trial court’s denial of its special appearance in this suit brought by Dent Zone Companies. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (West Supp.2012). Montgomery brings five issues asserting the t
ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
State of Ohio v. EPApublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2023 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 22-1081 STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ADVANCED ENERGY UN
Mohammad v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.public domain
THIEME, J. This products liability action arises out of a single vehicle accident that occurred on the Dulles access road in Fairfax, Virginia on February 15, 2003. This matter is before us on appeal by plaintiff Pazir Mohammad from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Toyota Motor Sales USA (“Toyota”), Darcars of Cherry Hill, Inc., and Aseer Mohammad. The defendants are the manufacturer, retail dealer, and t
34 F.Supp.2d 665 (1998) AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. MALJACK PRODUCTIONS, INC. d/b/a MPI Media Group and MPI Home Video, an Illinois corporation, Defendant, Maljack Productions, Inc. d/b/a MPI Media Group and MPI Home Video, an Illinois corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. British Broadcasting Corporation, a foreign corporation organized under the law of the United Kingdom, Third-Party Defenda
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge. Pending before this Court are Environmental Systems Testing, Inc., f/k/a, Environmental Systems Products, Inc. (“ESP”), SPX Corporation (“SPX”) and Snap-On Diagnostics (Manufacturing), a division of IDMC, Inc., and Snap-On Diagnostics (Sales & Service), a division of IDSC Holdings, Inc. (jointly referred to as “SUN”) (referred to collectiv
Elam v. Alcolac, Inc.public domain
765 S.W.2d 42 (1988) Betty L. ELAM, Clarence Elam and Linda Lou Sanders, Ethel M. Berry, Carl C.[*] and Jacqueline Berry, Virgil and Dorothy Bradley, Edward and Malva Gehlken, Dainie and Mary Lucetta Landon,[*] Gwendolyn and John C. Lawrence, Glen A. and Bernice Miller, Charlotte A. and John Phillips, Daniel Charles and Joyce Pryor and Amber Cross, Arnold L., Joy R., Joyce and Tammy Sommers, James R., Kay D., William Lance, Lisa and
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 31-OCT-2023 08:57 AM Dkt. 74 OP
Mayor & City Cncl. Of Balt. V. B.P. P.L.C.public domain
Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. B.P. P.L.C., et al.; Anne Arundel County, Maryland v. B.P. P.L.C., et al; City of Annapolis v. B.P. P.L.C., et al., No. 11, September Term, 2025, Opinion by Booth, J. FEDERAL DISPLACEMENT/PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW CLAIMS The Supreme Court of Maryland considered three consolidated cases—one case filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and two cases filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. In these cases, the Mayor and Council of Baltimore City
600 F.2d 600 Iberia HAMPTON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Edward V. HANRAHAN et al., Defendants-Appellees.UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Honorable Joseph Sam PERRY, Appellee,v.Jeffrey H. HAAS, Attorney at Law, Contemnor-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Honorable Joseph Sam PERRY, Appellee,v.G. Flint TAYLOR, Attorney at Law, Contemnor-Appellant. Nos. 77-1698, 77-1210 and 77-1370