Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stone v. Local No. 171 Pension Plan”
Burns v. MARLEY COMPANY PENSION PLANpublic domain
663 F.Supp.2d 135 (2009) David R. BURNS, Plaintiff, v. The MARLEY COMPANY PENSION PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES AT STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, The Administrative Committee of Marley Company Pension Plan for Hourly Employees at Stockton, California, SPX Corporation, SPX Retirement and Welfare Plan Administrative Committee, SPX Pension Service, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Benefits Payment Services, Defendants. No. CV-08-3763 (CPS).<
Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Judge Plaintiff Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter") seeks leave to file a Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") against Local 3 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (the "Union"), asserting a claim under Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.
Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCpublic domain
446 F.Supp.2d 163 (2006) THE PENSION COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PESION PLAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC; Citco Fund Services (Curacao) N.V.; The Citco Group Limited; International Fund Services (Ireland) Limited; Pricewaterhousecoopers (Netherland Antilles); John W. Bendall, Jr.; Richard Geist; Anthony Stocks; Kieran Conroy; and Declan Quilligan, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 9016(SAS).
SBFO Operator No. 3, LLC v. Onex Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1786 ___________________________ SBFO Operator No. 3, LLC; HC Stores 2017, LLC; SBFO Operator No. 4, LLC; SBFO Operator No. 5, LLC; SBFO Operator No. 6, LLC; SBFO Operator No. 9 - Wichita, LLC; Anchor Mobile Food Markets, Inc. Plaint
Dairy v. Dairy Employees Union Local No. 17 Christian Labor Ass'n of the United States of America Pension Trustpublic domain
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND A PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF Nos. 87, 88) Michael J. Seng, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Irigaray Dairy (“Irigaray”), Charles Van Der Kooi Dairy (“Van Der Kooi”), Henry Jongsma & Son Dairy (“Jongsma”), and Cow-West North Star Dairy (“Cow-West”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) ar
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Z. Lee, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund and Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund (the Funds) are employee benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C § 1001 et seq. The Funds claim that Defendant Allied Stone violated § 1145 of that Act by failing to make contrib
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INTER-LOCAL PENSION FUND ) GCC/IBT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0910-MTZ ) CALGON CARBON ) CORPORATION, )
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 677 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1075-NAC
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 677 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1075-NAC ) FRANK D. MARTELL,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 443 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ST. ) PAUL ELECTRICAL ) CONSTRUCTION PENSION PLAN, ) ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL ) CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ) SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN ) (2014 RESTATEMENT), ) RETIREMENT MEDICAL FUNDING ) PLAN FOR THE ST. PAUL ) ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AND SAN
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
SELYA, Circuit Judge. This case is before us at the behest of Teamsters Local Union No. 42 which seeks to set aside a finding of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board determined that the union committed an unfair labor practice in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(b)(1)(A), (b)(2), see Teamsters Local 42, 281 N.L.R.B. No. 132 (Sept. 30, 1986), and has now cross-applied for enforcement of its order. In chasing do
825 F.2d 608 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2046, 107 Lab.Cas. P 10,104 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 42, a/w International Brotherhoodof Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpersof America, Petitioner, Appellant,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Appellee. No. 86-2011. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Jun
Stone v. Stonepublic domain
450 F.Supp. 919 (1978) Noel Zeona STONE, Plaintiff, v. Ward Herbert STONE, Seafarers International Union, Pacific District, Pacific Maritime Association Pension Plan, Does One through Five, Defendants. No. C-77-1124-CBR. United States District Court, N. D. California. April 18, 1978. Dennis R. Pedersen, Walnut Creek, Cal., for plaintiff. Dennis Daniels, Ernst
Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v. United Statespublic domain
Mr. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioners — Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 and three individual officers of the Union — were convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri of conspiracy under .18 U. S. C. § 371' to violate 18 U. S. C. § 610. At the time of trial § 610 provided in relevant part: “It is unlawful .
766 A.2d 219 (2001) 136 Md. App. 512 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. BALTIMORE CITY FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 734, I.A.F.F., et al. No. 0181, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 5, 2001. *220 William R. Phelan, Jr., Principal Counsel (David Leibowitz, Associate Solicitor and Ad
Local Union No. 391, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
543 F.2d 1373 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2987, 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 1373,178 U.S.App.D.C. 60, 78 Lab.Cas. P 11,475,79 Lab.Cas. P 11,584 LOCAL UNION NO. 391, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,etc., Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,Chattanooga Division, Vulcan Materials Co., Intervenor. No. 74-1167. United States Court of Appeals,
Local Union No. 391, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This case comes to us upon the petition of Local Union No. 391, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-men and Helpers of America (the Union) to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board has filed a cross application for enforcement of its order, which directed the Union to cease and desist from a secondary boycott. The Board’s decision and order are reporte
609 F.Supp. 1302 (1984) CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 1846 OF the UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al. v. PRATT-FARNSWORTH, INC., et al. Civ. A. No. 80-1570. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. December 6, 1984. *1303 Marie Healey, Gardner, Robein & Healey, Metairie, La., for plainti
U.S. Information Systems, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 3public domain
313 F.Supp.2d 213 (2004) U.S. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Odyssey Group, Inc. and Blue Diamond Fiber Optic Networks, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NUMBER 3, AFL-CIO, A R Communication Contractors Inc., Adco Electrical Corporation, Five Star Electric Corporation, Forest Electric Corporation, Hugh O'Kane Electric Company LLC, IPC Communications, Inc. and Nead Information Systems, Defendants.