Cases

OPINION McKEE, Circuit Judge. Joanne Gantt appeals the district court’s affirmance of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for benefits under the Social Security Act. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the following reasons, we will affirm. I. Be

107 F.3d 863 Herbert L. Stonev.Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security NO. 96-1520 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Feb 25, 1997 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.95cv07422 , O'Neill, J. 1

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1540 ESIN E. ARAKAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Timothy M. Cain, Distr

MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Plaintiff Melissa Ren’e Kennedy (“Plaintiff’) brought this action on June 1, 2012 seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1382. The Court referred the matter to United St

ORDER EARL EL CARROLL, District Judge. This is an action for judicial review of a denial of disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The matter is fully briefed (Doc. 31 & 33). Plaintiff did not file a reply brief. Plaintiff applied for disability benefits on January 13, 2006 (Administrative Record [Tr.]) at approximately years of age, alleging an onset of

DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. # 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommend

OPINION AND ORDER Malcolm F. Marsh, United States District Judge Plaintiff Denis Murray seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons

MEMORANDUM ** Jason Stone appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commisioner’s denial of his application for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and we affirm the denial of benefits. We review the district court’s decision de novo. Bayliss v. Barnhart, 427 F.3d 1211, 1214 n. 1 (9th Cir.2005). The standard of review for the ALJ’s dec

OPINION BAYLSON, District Judge: Appellant Heather Rounds appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the decision of a Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Although we find no error in the ALJ’s rulings on several issues, we vacate in part and remand because t

ORDER The opinion filed on August 4, 2015, and published at 795 F.3d 1177, is hereby amended and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges W. Fletcher, Hurwitz, and Baylson have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges W. Fletcher and Hurwitz have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc

MEMORANDUM ** Jason Stone appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commisioner’s denial of his application for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and we affirm the denial of benefits. We review the district court’s decision de novo. Bayliss v. Barnhart, 427 F.3d 1211, 1214 n. 1 (9th Cir.2005). The standard of review for the ALJ’s dec

OPINION COWEN, Circuit Judge. Magaly Santini appeals from the District Court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. For the following reasons, we will affirm. I. Santini was born in 1967. She has worked as a data entry employee. In June 2006, she applied for Social Security Disability Insu

652 F.Supp.2d 846 (2009) Timothy BERKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 08-12862. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 9, 2009. *848 Thomas J. Bertino, Wyandotte, MI, for Plaintiff. Theresa M. Ausa Urbanic, U.S. Attorney's Office, Detroit, MI, for

OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Mark Hagans appeals the cessation of his Social Security disability insurance benefits following a determination by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) that he was no longer disabled. Hagans argues the District Court erred by reviewing his disability status as of September 1, 2004 — the day on which, according to t

528 F.Supp.2d 716 (2007) Paul VELTKAMP, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-295. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 5, 2007. *717 James R. Rinck, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Ronald M. Stella, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant.

559 F.Supp.2d 722 (2008) Hedwig A. MARCH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-2093-G. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. June 2, 2008. *723 Cheryl Chapman Langston, Law Office of Cheryl Chapman Langston, Forney, TX, for Plaintiff. Shane R

567 F.Supp.2d 893 (2008) Tamara Jean BRAGG, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1409-N (BH). United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. June 6, 2008. *896 Cheryl Chapman Langston, Law Office of Cheryl Chapman Langston, Forney, TX, for Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM *** April Papen appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The panel’s review is “essentially the same as that undertaken by the district court.” Stone v. Heckler, 7

537 F.Supp.2d 823 (2008) Lela M. McNAIR, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1889-B (BH). United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 6, 2008. *824 Elizabeth B. Dunlap, Law Office of Elizabeth B. Dunlap, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. Stephen P.

332 F.Supp.2d 474 (2004) Madeline STONE Plaintiff v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant No. 3:03CV449(CFD)(TPS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. April 27, 2004. *475 Allan B. Rubenstein, New Haven, CT, for Madeline Stone, Plaintiff. Ann M. Nevins, U.S. Attorney's Office-BPT, Bridge