Cases

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 508–593 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

OPINION ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Plaintiffs, a group of corporate entities engaged in the production, marketing, distribution, and transmission of broadcast television programs, move to enjoin Defendant AEREO, Inc., (“Aereo”) from engaging in those aspects of its service that allow its users to access “live” copyrighted content over the internet. Aereo claims that its conduct does not

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant America’s Home Place, Inc. (“AHP”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 66). This case involves Plaintiff Kaveh Sari (“Sari”)’s claim that AHP infringed on his copyright in architectural plans in violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. and AHP’s Counterclaims.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.. Plaintiff SolidFX, LLC (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendant Jep*1075pesen Sanderson, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.

528 F.3d 1258 (2008) MESHWERKS, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation; Grace & Wild, a Michigan corporation doing business as Division X; 3D Recon, a Utah limited liability company; Saatchi & Saatchi North America, a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-4222. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.<

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Arquitectonica’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (D.E. 81). Upon review of the record and careful consideration, the Court finds that the Motion should be granted and the case be dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LYNWOOD SMITH, District Judge. Plaintiff, Jeff Benton Homes, Inc. (“Jeff Benton”) filed this case on April 22, 2011, asserting claims of copyright infringement under the federal Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (the “Copyright Act”), against defendants Alabama Heritage Homes, Inc. (“Alabama Heritage”), and Stoneridge Homes, Inc. (“Stoneridge”). Plaint

275 F.Supp.2d 506 (2003) YURMAN DESIGN, INC., and Yurman Studios Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN TREASURE IMPORTS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00 Civ.0202 JGK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 5, 2003. *507 Maxim H. Waldbaum, Xuan-Thao N. Nguyen, Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, LLP, Emily M. Spectre, Salans,

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. CONTENTS I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...............................................573 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..............................................574 A. Ford’s Colony..................................................

200 F.Supp.2d 512 (2002) Neil F. COMINS, Plaintiff v. DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and York Films Ltd. Defendants No. CIV.PJM 00-1411. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 28, 2002. *513 *514 Jerry L. Squires, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Lee J. Levine, Washington, DC, f

935 F.Supp. 425 (1996) ARCHITECTRONICS, INC., a New York corporation, Plaintiff, v. CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Artist Graphics Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, Cad Source, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Access Graphics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. No. 92 Civ. 9174 (MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 1, 1996.

596 F.3d 1313 (2010) UTOPIA PROVIDER SYSTEMS, INC., a.k.a. Utopia Providers Systems, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, Joshua Plummer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PRO-MED CLINICAL SYSTEMS, L.L.C., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, Thomas L. Grossjung, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 09-11160, 09-11447 and 09-12887. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Feb

TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. CMM Cable Rep., Inc. (“CMM”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing all but one of its claims for federal copyright, trademark, and trade dress infringement and related state law claims. See CMM Cable Rep., Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc., 888 F.Supp. 192 (D.Me.1995). CMM brought suit against Ocean Coast Properties, Inc. (radio station WPOR), several of

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a computer program for the operation of a dental laboratory, and calls upon us to apply the principles underlying our venerable copyright laws to the relatively new field of computer technology to determine the scope of copyright protection of a computer program. More particularly, in this case of first impression in the courts of appeals

797 F.2d 1222 55 USLW 2094, 230 U.S.P.Q. 481, 1986Copr.L.Dec. P 25,978,21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 571 WHELAN ASSOCIATES, INC.v.JASLOW DENTAL LABORATORY, INC., Dentcom, Inc., EdwardJaslow, Rand Jaslow, and Joseph M. Cerra.Appeal of JASLOW DENTAL LABORATORY, INC., Edward Jaslow,Rand Jaslow, and Dentcom, Inc. No. 85-1358. United States Court of Appe

97 F.3d 1504 41 U.S.P.Q.2d 1065 CMM CABLE REP, INC., d/b/a Creative Media Management, Inc.,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.OCEAN COAST PROPERTIES, INC., d/b/a/ WPOR-FM, Robert Gold,individually and officially as General Manager,Graphics North, Inc. and James Spizuoco,Defendants-Appellees.CMM CABLE REP, INC., d/b/a Creative Media Management, Inc.,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.OCEAN COAST PROPERTIES,

Justice Stevens, dissenting. This litigation involves the interpretation of Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention. The plain language of that Article, quoted ante, at 247, requires that the liability limits be determined by reference to the value of “gold at the standard of fineness of nine hundred thousandths” and then converted into our “national currency in round figures.” The Court

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1168 Doc: 92 Filed: 02/20/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1168 SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; ARISTA MUSIC; ARISTA RECORDS, LLC; LAFACE RECORDS LLC; PROVIDENT LABEL GROUP, LLC; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT US LATIN LLC; VOLCANO ENTERTAINME

FEUERSTEIN, District Judge: I. Introduction On September 12, 2017, plaintiff Wolo Manufacturing Corp. ("plaintiff" or "Wolo") commenced this action against defendants ABC Corp., d/b/a Vixenhorns.com ("Vixen"); XYZ Corp., d/b/a Hookedontronics.com ("Tronics"); Aftak Corp. ("Aftak"), d/b/a Aftakcorp.com; and Arie Feldman ("Feldman") (collectively, "defendants"), asserting claims, inter alia , for copyright in