Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stiles v. Bain”
Staley Family Partnership, Ltd. v. Stilespublic domain
JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This matter involves a landlocked tract of land and property adjacent to it that were part of an; 1853 land grant from the State of Texas. The land grant was partitioned into separate tracts in 1866 at which time the tracts were severed. The eventual owner of the landlocked tract sought to establish a roadway easement across the adjacent property, but the tria
J. Stiles, Inc. v. Evanspublic domain
03/27/1985 App for WOE / Disposed GRANTED 483 03/27/1985 Supreme Court opinion issued CA RV/TCAF 05/29/1985 Motion for Rehearing Disposed OVERRULED 06/19/1985 Misc motion disposed. See Remarks. OVERRULED Appellee Jack Evans moves to strike certain instruments filed by appellant J. Stiles, Inc. in an attempt to suspend execution of judgment. We hold that Stiles did not file a proper supersedeas bond under Tex.R.Civ.P. 364 nor did it deposit a negotiable instrument in lieu of bond as per
OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Appellant, the Staley Family Partnership, Ltd. (Staley) brought an action seeking a judicial declaration that it has an easement by necessity across land owned by appellees David Lee Stiles, Delzie Stiles, Ginger Westbrook, Robert Stiles, and David Stiles to access County Road 134 (CR 134). Appel
Bain v. Andersonpublic domain
427 So.2d 60 (1983) Elliott M. BAIN v. Nancy ANDERSON. No. CA 0203. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. February 3, 1983. *61 Lucas F. Bruno, Jr. and James J. Grevemberg, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant. Robert E. Kerrigan, Jr., Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee. Befo
Stiles v. Royal Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
798 S.W.2d 591 (1990) Terry STILES, Appellant, v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee. No. 05-89-01409-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 31, 1990. Rehearing Denied November 13, 1990. *592 Dena M. Kashiwamura, Dallas, for appellant. Sharis L. Jinks, Dallas, for appellee. Before E
Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #023 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 5th day of May, 2015, are as follows: BY GUIDRY, J.: 2013-C -2878 JAMES CLIFFORD ARRANT, ET AL. v. GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, C/W INC., ET AL. C/W MARVIN JACK BARNETT, JR., ET AL. v. GRAPHIC 2013-C -2981 PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. C
Stiles v. Cummingspublic domain
Cobb, J. In 1876 Alexander Cummings Jr. executed a deed to land, “in trust, nevertheless, and to and.for the sole use, benefit, and behoof of the said Nellie Ann, my wife as aforesaid, during her natural life, and my four children, to wit, Lawrence aged 10 years, Albert 7 years, Talbot aged 4 years, and Homer H. aged two years, and any future children I may have by my said wife,” It was further provided that in the event of the
Mullins v. Crete Carrier Corp./shaffer Truckingpublic domain
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before former Deputy Commissioner Jones. The parties have shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; therefore, the Full Commission MODIFIES and AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the former Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matter
Pollard v. Roadway Express, Inc.public domain
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission adopts with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the foll
Everett v. Roadway Expresspublic domain
In this matter, the majority of the Full Commission found that plaintiffs claim for a change of condition was not filed within the two (2) year limit imposed by G.S. 97-47. Because I believe that the analysis of this case by the Commission was incorrect, I respectfully dissent from the majoritys Opinion and Award. The parties in this matter stipulated that plaintiff sustained a compensable back injury on 17 January 1994, for which an Industrial Commis
Moseley v. Blythe Equipment Companypublic domain
Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence MODIFIES and AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner as follows: The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as a matter of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Depu
Vaughn v. Insulating Setvicespublic domain
The majority in the case before us has erred in denying plaintiff's claim for asbestosis and asbestos-related pulmonary disease. The majority, in its Opinion and Award, stated that plaintiff failed to establish that he was last injuriously exposured to the hazards of asbestos during his employment with defendant-employer. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-57. However, an examination of the evidence of record makes it clear that plaintiff was sufficientl
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-25-00005-CV TODD HEATH, APPELLANT V. SUNSET CLIFF ESTATES ROAD AND GATE MAINTENANCE, INC., APPELLEES On Appeal from the 424th District Court
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00035-CV Robert MEDINA and Christina MEDINA, Appellants v. Timothy K. BOWERS,
Marley Aaron Barker v. Pine Tree I.S.D.public domain
NO. 12-24-00200-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MARLEY AARON BARKER, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 PINE TREE I.S.D., APPELLEE § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS
Lisa Kelley v. Nathaniel Rootpublic domain
01/29/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 12, 2023 Session LISA KELLEY ET AL. v. NATHANIEL ROOT ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for McNairy County No. 2019-CV-12 J. Weber McCraw, Judge ___________________________________
Hyosung USA, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am.public domain
Hyosung USA, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., 2021 NCBC 16. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 19 CVS 23974 HYOSUNG USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY ORDER AND OPINION ON THIRD- CASUALTY COMPANY OF PARTY DEFENDANT DUKE REALTY AMERICA; HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE C
Turner v. Thomaspublic domain
NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on Defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff Robert Sanchez Turner ("Turner") alleges several claims for damages sustained at the August 12, 2017 "Unite the Right" rally. These claims are asserted against Defendants Al Thomas Jr. ("Thomas"), former Chief of the Charlottesville Police De
Fort Worth & Western Railroad Company v. Nathan D. Albert and Chisholm Trail Redi-Mix, LLCpublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-18-00219-CV FORT WORTH & WESTERN RAILROAD CO., Appellant v. NATHAN D. ALBERT AND CHISHOLM TRAIL REDI-MIX, LLC, Appellees From the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court
Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.public domain
KNOLL, Justice, dissenting. Because I find NIHL is neither a covered occupational disease under any version of La.Rev.Stat. § 23:1031.1, nor a personal injury by accident under any applicable version of the LWCA, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmation of the judgment of the court of appeal and find plaintiffs’ tort claims against their employers for NIHL are not barred by the exclusive remedy pr