Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “Stickel v. AB Tech Services Inc.”
In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housingpublic domain
Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. The Mount Laurel series of cases 1 recognized that the power to zone carries a constitutional obligation to do so in a manner that creates a realistic opportunity for producing a fair share of the
T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporationpublic domain
Cuéllar, J. *154 Under California law, a brand-name drug manufacturer has a duty to warn of known or reasonably knowable adverse effects arising from an individual's use of its drug. (See Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1973)
In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housingpublic domain
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) In re Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 & 5:97 by N.J. Council on Affordable Housing (A-90 to -94-10) (067126) Argued November 14, 2012