Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stewart v. Supreme Court Of California”
Stewart v. Californiapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Lallier v. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusettspublic domain
*1188ante, p. 1027; ante, p. 1029; ante, p. 1091; ante, p. 1049; ante, p. 1013; ante, p. 1000; ante, p. 1014; ante, p. 1014; ante, p. 1001; ante, p. 1031;
Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Order Certifying a Question to the Supreme Court of Californiapublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, concurring. Today we file two orders in the appeals regarding the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which provides, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” Put differently, the proposition prohibits same-sex marriage. Marriage between individuals of the same sex is a matter that is highly controversial in this country and in
Stewart v. Californiapublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
543 U.S. 1060 STEWARTv.WOODFORD, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 04-6855. Supreme Court of United States. January 10, 2005. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 205.
Gillotti v. Stewartpublic domain
Opinion HULL, J. —In this construction defect lawsuit by a homeowner, the jury found the general contractor—defendant Estate of William G. Davidson, formerly Davidson Construction (Davidson)—negligent and liable for some, but not all, alleged violations of building standards under the Right to Repair Ac
*185Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2002, which issued a declaration that defendant owed no obligation to plaintiff, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and, upon a search of the record, granted summary judgment to defendant, dismissing the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff bank is the ass
Stewart v. Beardpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. Beardpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Moore v. Stewart Title of Californiapublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Moore v. Stewart Title of Californiapublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Hayward v. Superior Court of Napa Countypublic domain
Opinion KLINE, P. J. The issues in this matrimonial case arise from the failure of an attorney serving as a temporary judge pursuant to article VI, section 21,1 of the California Constitution to disclose grounds for her disqualification in the manner required by a canon of the Code of Judicial Ethics2 applicab
Stewart v. Superior Courtpublic domain
Filed 10/12/17 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MAXINE STEWART, as Personal Representative, etc.,† E067316 Petitioner, (Super.Ct.No. CIVVS1205737) v.
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Johnstonpublic domain
*302REPRIMAND ORDERED PER CURIAM. [¶ 1] Attorney DeWayne A. Johnston objects to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommending that he be reprimanded, that he refund certain amounts billed to a client, that he complete six hours of continuing legal education, and that he pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding in
Stewart v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cnty.public domain
RAMIREZ, P. J. *90The petition in this case challenges a trial court order summarily adjudicating a cause of action under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (the Act), a cause of action for fraud by concealment, and another for medical battery, while allowing other claims, including one for medical negligence, to proceed to
California v. Superior Court of Californiapublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of respondents Engert and Gamble for leavé to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeal to consider whether its judgment is based upon federal or state constitutional grounds, or both. See California v. Krivda, 409 U. S. 33 (1972). Justice Brennan, Justice Stewart, and Justice Stevens dissent.
California Grocers Assn. v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
Filed 7/18/11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA GROCERS ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S176099 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/5 B206750 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ) )
Stewart v. Californiapublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Stewart v. Woodfordpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chin, J. *1036 Real parties in interest, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) of the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) of the County of Los Angeles (collectively, real parties) employ automated license plate reader (ALPR) technology in order to loca