⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Stewart v. Supreme Court Of California”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 2881; 189 L. Ed. 2d 842; 82 U.S.L.W. 3746; 2014 WL 2921769; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4529
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 568 U.S. 1188; 133 S. Ct. 1320; 185 L. Ed. 2d 237
*1188ante, p. 1027; ante, p. 1029; ante, p. 1091; ante, p. 1049; ante, p. 1013; ante, p. 1000; ante, p. 1014; ante, p. 1014; ante, p. 1001; ante, p. 1031;
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-01-04 · Published · cited 4× · 628 F.3d 1191; 2011 WL 9633
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, concurring. Today we file two orders in the appeals regarding the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which provides, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” Put differently, the proposition prohibits same-sex marriage. Marriage between individuals of the same sex is a matter that is highly controversial in this country and in
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 528 U.S. 828; 120 S. Ct. 81
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1060; 125 S. Ct. 877
543 U.S. 1060 STEWARTv.WOODFORD, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 04-6855. Supreme Court of United States. January 10, 2005. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 205.
Gillotti v. Stewartpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2017-04-26 · Published · cited 18× · 11 Cal. App. 5th 875; 217 Cal. Rptr. 3d 860; 2017 WL 2212963; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 451
Opinion HULL, J. —In this construction defect lawsuit by a homeowner, the jury found the general contractor—defendant Estate of William G. Davidson, formerly Davidson Construction (Davidson)—negligent and liable for some, but not all, alleged violations of building standards under the Right to Repair Ac
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 6 A.D.3d 184; 774 N.Y.S.2d 516; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3728
*185Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2002, which issued a declaration that defendant owed no obligation to plaintiff, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and, upon a search of the record, granted summary judgment to defendant, dismissing the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff bank is the ass
Stewart v. Beardpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 1026; 190 L. Ed. 2d 859; 83 U.S.L.W. 3580; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 509
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. Beardpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 341; 190 L. Ed. 2d 187; 83 U.S.L.W. 3192; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5566
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 498 U.S. 903
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 498 U.S. 903; 112 L. Ed. 2d 222; 59 U.S.L.W. 3276; 111 S. Ct. 265; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 5068
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
California Court of Appeal · 2016-08-03 · Published · cited 4× · 2 Cal. App. 5th 10; 206 Cal. Rptr. 3d 102; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 641
Opinion KLINE, P. J. The issues in this matrimonial case arise from the failure of an attorney serving as a temporary judge pursuant to article VI, section 21,1 of the California Constitution to disclose grounds for her disqualification in the manner required by a canon of the Code of Judicial Ethics2 applicab
California Court of Appeal · 2017-10-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/12/17 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MAXINE STEWART, as Personal Representative, etc.,† E067316 Petitioner, (Super.Ct.No. CIVVS1205737) v.
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015-12-01 · Published · cited 0× · 872 N.W.2d 300; 2015 ND 282; 2015 N.D. LEXIS 297; 2015 WL 7738096
*302REPRIMAND ORDERED PER CURIAM. [¶ 1] Attorney DeWayne A. Johnston objects to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommending that he be reprimanded, that he refund certain amounts billed to a client, that he complete six hours of continuing legal education, and that he pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding in
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-10-12 · Published · cited 7× · 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 219; 16 Cal. App. 5th 87; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 879
RAMIREZ, P. J. *90The petition in this case challenges a trial court order summarily adjudicating a cause of action under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (the Act), a cause of action for fraud by concealment, and another for medical battery, while allowing other claims, including one for medical negligence, to proceed to
Supreme Court of the United States · 1980-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 449 U.S. 945; 101 S. Ct. 344
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of respondents Engert and Gamble for leavé to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeal to consider whether its judgment is based upon federal or state constitutional grounds, or both. See California v. Krivda, 409 U. S. 33 (1972). Justice Brennan, Justice Stewart, and Justice Stevens dissent.
California Supreme Court · 2011-07-18 · Published · cited 64× · 52 Cal. 4th 177; 191 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2267; 127 Cal. Rptr. 3d 726; 254 P.3d 1019; 2011 Cal. LEXIS 7067
Filed 7/18/11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA GROCERS ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S176099 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/5 B206750 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ) )
Supreme Court of the United States · 1979-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 439 U.S. 1131; 99 S. Ct. 1051
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Stewart v. Woodfordpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1060
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
California Supreme Court · 2017-08-31 · Published · cited 16× · 221 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832; 400 P.3d 432; 3 Cal. 5th 1032; 2017 Cal. LEXIS 6768
Chin, J. *1036 Real parties in interest, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) of the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) of the County of Los Angeles (collectively, real parties) employ automated license plate reader (ALPR) technology in order to loca