Cases

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED109602 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County v.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE MICHELLE PETERMAN, ) ED107000 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County v.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE JENA RAE HAFFNER, ) No. ED107926 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-SA-01079-SCT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/30/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TAMETRICE EDRICKA HODGES TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JOHN STEWART STRINGER NICHOLAS ALEXANDER LOMELI JOHN F

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR MO CANN DO, INC., ) No. ED110329 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. ) 20SL-CC05846 ) MISS

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Chief Judge. Bradley Stewart appeals the circuit court’s judgment upholding the decision by the director of the Department of Revenue to revoke his driving privileges pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo 2000, for refusing to submit to a breathalyzer test. Stewart contends that the circuit court’s judgment is not supported by substantial evidence because the director did not establish that the arresting officer had r

GARY W. LYNCH, J. Fowler Land Company, Inc., and the Margaret Leist Revocable Trust (individually “Fowler” and “Leist,” respectively, and collectively “property owners”) appeal the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Missouri Land Reclamation Commission (“Commission”) upholding the approval by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources Land Reclamation Program (“Program”) of Alternate Fuels, Inc.’s (“AFI”) a

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) WD86602 ) V. ) OPINION FILED: ) APRIL 23, 2024 LARRY DANIEL BRASHIER,

JUSTICE JONES, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Plainly, the taxpayer in this case made a mistake in the manner it calculated the retailers’ occupation tax and the municipal retailers’ occupation tax. The mistake arose from a misinterpretation of the Illinois statutes or from a failure to make any investigation or inquiry regarding the Illinoi

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division TERRY BRACKNEY, AS PERSONAL ) REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE ) OF RENATE MACK, ) ) Respondent, ) v. ) No. SD37733 ) Filed: June 14, 2023 ROBERT WALKER and NANCY ) WALKER,

Case: 13-10566 Date Filed: 05/05/2014 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-10566 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cv-62

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc KYLE G. PETERSEN, ) Opinion issued November 22, 2022 ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SC99522 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, )

PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether the sovereign immunity of Florida, as confirmed by the Eleventh Amendment, U.S. Const. Amend. XI, bars a federal complaint by an Indian tribe against the Florida Department of Revenue and its Executive Director for a declaratory judgment that the tribe is exempt from paying a Florida tax on fuel and for an injunction requiring a refund of taxes paid. The Semin

128 S.Ct. 1801 (2008) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. DAVIS et ux. No. 06-666. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 5, 2007. Decided May 19, 2008. *1804 C. Christopher Trower, Atlanta, GA, for petitioners. G. Eric Brunstad, Jr., Hartford, CT, for respondents.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Opinion issued April 26, 2022 ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SC99081 ) TIMOTHY A. SHEPHERD, )

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. In Missouri, physically disabled people who pay a $2.00 annual fee to the state revenue department may obtain permanent removable windshield placards authorizing them to use reserved accessible parking spaces. The plaintiffs, a class of all who have purchased, or will purchase, such placards, sought a declaration that the charge of a fee for the placards violates Title II of the America

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Opinion issued April 26, 2022 ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SC99081 ) TIMOTHY A. SHEPHERD, )

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division Two STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) No. SD36716 vs.

Justice Thomas, concurring. Although I join the Court’s opinion, I write separately to express my serious doubt that the Constitution permits us to adjudicate cases in this area. Despite the Court’s repeated holdings that “[t]he Due Process and Commerce Clauses forbid the States to tax ‘extraterritorial values,’” ante, at 19 (quoting Container Corp. o

BENTON, Circuit Judge. This is a class action against the State and governor of Missouri, the director of the Missouri State Public Defender office, and the commissioners of the Missouri State Public Defender Commission. The plaintiffs alleged that the State "has failed to meet its constitutional obligation to provide indigent defendants with meaningful representation." Invoking sovere