Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-2185 REGINALD CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the N

41 A.3d 401 (2012) Danielle M. STEWART,[1] Respondent Below, Appellant, v. Thomas D. STEWART, Petitioner Below, Appellee. No. 489, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 14, 2012. Decided: March 15, 2012. *402 Bruce A. Rogers, Esquire, Law Offices of Bruce A. Rogers, Esquire, P.A., Georgetow

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0175p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DANIEL STEWART; RACHEL KOSOFF, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, District Judge Plaintiff Linda Clay asserts statutory and tort claims against her former employer and supervisor, all related to the end of her employment in the Human Resources department at Howard University. Defendants Howard University and James Jones moved to dismiss Clay’s complaint, and Clay moved orally

JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge. Louise Ressler, a former employee in the office of the Clay County Treasurer, sued Clay County, alleging among her claims a class action on behalf of herself and other female employees (“putative class members”) for gender discrimination in compensation in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Chapter 213, RSMo. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Clay County on her

[Cite as Stewart v. Solutions Community Counseling & Recovery Ctrs., Inc., 2021-Ohio-2635.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY BONITA STEWART, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2021-01-008 :

683 F.Supp.2d 1261 (2010) SHANNON'S RAINBOW, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Shannon's Rainbow, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Shannon's Rainbow Production, a Pennsylvania limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. SUPERNOVA MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation; Joycelyn Engle a/k/a Joceyln DiPalma, an individual, Joseph DiPalma, an individual, Julianne Michelle, an individual, Kelly Kent, an individual, and Does 1-100, Defendant

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO SHARON SMITH, et al., ) No. ED109668 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Washington County vs. ) 19WA-CC

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge Juan Pérez-Maspons (“Plaintiff’) brings an employment discrimination action against Defendants Stewart Title Puerto Rico, Inc. (“STPR”), Stewart Title Guaranty Company (“STGC”), Stewart Title Company (“STC”), Stewart Information Services Corporation (“SISCO”), and Maritza Quezada (“Quezada”) (collectively “Defendants”). (Docket No. 5 ¶¶ 19-2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND REPORT OF DONALD LEACH, II, AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................909 A. Factual Background For Summary Judgment..........................9

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 19-1335 ___________ STEWART MERRITTS, JR., Appellant v. LESLIE RICHARDS, in both her official and individual capacity as an official of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; EDWAR

CLARK, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from an action that a supplier, The Trane Company (“Trane”), filed against a general contractor, White-hurst-Lassen Construction Company (“Whitehurst-Lassen”), and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & 6”) on September 10, 1987. The suit alleges a breach of a labor and material payment bond required under the Alaba

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3755 ___________________________ Keller Farms, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellant v. McGarity Flying Service, LLC; Dennis E. McGarity; Michael C. Pemberton; John

Clay Kilgore Construction, Inc. ("Kilgore"), appeals from a summary judgment for Buchalter/Grant, L.L.C., and Buchalter II, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Buchalter"), on Kilgore's cross-claims alleging fraud and suppression against Buchalter, in actions commenced against Kilgore and Buchalter by purchasers of homes constructed by Kilgore in the Southland Estates ("Southland"), a 40-lot subdivision developed by Buchalter. We affirm. I. Factual Backg

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. On February 24, 2015, Red Clay Consolidated School District (“Red Clay”) sought approval from voters to increase the school-related property taxes paid by owners of non-exempt real estate located within the school district. The referendum passed with 6,395 residents voting in favor and 5,515 against.

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In February 2015, Red Clay Consolidated School District (“Red Clay”) held a special election in which residents were asked to approve an increase in the school-related property taxes paid by owners of non-exempt real estate located within the district (the “Special Election”). Red Clay prevailed in the Special Election, w

248 S.W.3d 60 (2008) GLADSTONE SPECIAL ROAD DISTRICT NO. 3 OF CLAY COUNTY, et al., Respondents, v. COUNTY OF CLAY, Missouri, Appellant. No. WD 67977. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 22, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 4, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied April 15, 2008.

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: P.W. & Sons Trucking, Inc. (PWS) and Fred Paillet IV appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Consumers County Mutual Insurance Co. (“Consumers”) in this declaratory judgment action. Specifically, PWS and Paillet contend that the district court erred when it relied on a Department of Transportation

Opinion issued March 12, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00210-CV ——————————— FREEDOM EQUITY GROUP, INC., Appellant V. MTL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. #25) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defen*658dants Kettering Health Network (“Kettering”) and Grandview Medical Center (“Grandview”). (Doc. # 25.) This motion is now fully briefed and rip