Cases

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Stevenson v. King, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3093.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Lorain County, in which the legality of the court's action in sustaining a demurrer to a petition charging libel, and the subsequent dismissal of the petition, is challenged by Dr. Stephen Sheppard, the plaintiff. On February 14, 1963, the Elyria Chronicle-Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, of which Peter L. Stevenson, a defendant in the trial court and the appellee here, was the managing e

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'

556 F.Supp. 825 (1982) SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-0545. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 21, 1982. As Amended January 10, 1983. *826 *827

[Cite as Property Junkie, L.L.C. v. Akron Dept. of Neighborhood Assistance, 2025-Ohio-3056.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) PROPERTY JUNKIE, LLC C.A. No. 31303 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J. {¶ 1} In September 2001, appellee Hamilton County Municipal Judge Ralph E. Winkler conducted a bench trial in which the defendant was acquitted of all charges. On September 27, 2001, the day after the trial’s conclusion, the defendant filed a motion to seal the official record of his case pursuant to R.C. 2953.52. On November 5, 2001 (almost six weeks after the trial), Judge Winkler held a hearing

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: Lawrence M. and Jane A. Downey (“the Downeys”) appeal from the judgment entered against them following a jury verdict in favor of Jack and Linda Krafft (“the Kraffts”). Specifically, the Downeys challenge the denial of their motion for attorney fees under the Pennsylvania Uniform *331Trade Secrets Act (“the PUTSA”), 12 Pa. C.S.A

[Cite as Maleky v. Ohio State Univ., Office of Compliance & Integrity, 2026-Ohio-890.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Farnaz Maleky, : Requester-Appellant, : No. 25AP-304 v. : (Ct. of Cl. No. 2

Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2015 NCBC 76. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 14 CVS 14445 JAMES W. BRADSHAW, CARLA O. BRADSHAW, RESORT RETAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., E.C. BROADFOOT, CHRISTINA DUNN CHANDRA, JAMES DOYLE, THOMAS F. EGAN, CHARLES EGGERT, MARK P. GARSIDE, CLARK GREEN, DR. JAMES J. GREEN, JR., ROBERT K. GRUNEWALD, RONALD HOLMES, DAVID LAUCK, CUR

Lockerman v. S. River Elec. Membership Corp., 2015 NCBC 57. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF SAMPSON 11 CVS 152 TED B. LOCKERMAN, ) ADMINISTRATOR D.B.N. OF THE ) ESTATES OF ELLEN DUDLEY SPELL, ) DECEASED, And SULIE DANIELS ) SPELL, DECEASED,

SELYA, Circuit Judge. *11This case implicates a plethora of issues arising in the shadow of the First Amendment. Most notably, it requires us to address the power of a court to impose a prior restraint in the form of a permanent injunction forbidding the publication of words-words that the court believes have been used to defame the plaintiff in

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7024 Doc: 42 Filed: 05/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 112 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner – Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER PERKINS, Respo

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________

*487 ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On July 19, 2010, Special Master Daniel J. Capra issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned case recommending that the Court adopt the following conclusions: Count I, Breach of Contract: • Count I should

63 B.R. 361 (1986) In re COASTAL INDUSTRIES, INC. and Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. Debtors and Debtors In Possession. COASTAL INDUSTRIES, INC. and Coastal Tank Lines, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 586-765, 586-766, Adv. No. 586-0186. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. July 17, 1986.

747 F.Supp. 1515 (1990) Rosann C. SCHEETZ and Kenneth L. Scheetz, Jr. v. The MORNING CALL, INC., Terry L. Mutchler, and John Doe and/or Jane Doe. Civ. A. No. 89-6755. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 1, 1990. *1516 *1517 James T. Huber, Huber & Waldron, Allentown, P

INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC

32 Cal.App.3d 219 (1973) 108 Cal. Rptr. 251 CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HOUSTON I. FLOURNOY, as State Controller, et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. 40554. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. May 9, 1973. *222 COUNSE

443 F.2d 867 169 U.S.P.Q. 625 CARTER-WALLACE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.DAVIS-EDWARDS PHARMACAL CORP., Defendant-Appellant. No. 889, Docket 71-1256. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued April 1, 1971.Decided May 4, 1971. Charles R. Brainard, New York City (Kenyon

*277Mr. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion of the Court.* A Special Term of the Court was convened upon the Attorney General’s application to review a stay of execution in this case, issued by Mr. Justice Douglas. Our action was unusual. So were the cir