Cases

12 Cal.App.4th 221 (1993) 15 Cal. Rptr.2d 711 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Respondent; JULIA KOCH et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. A057731. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three. January 11, 1993. *222 COUNSEL

GROSS, J. The primary issue we address in this case is whether an offer of settlement was a “joint proposal” within the meaning of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(3), so that it was required to “state the amount and terms attributable to each party.” We hold that the proposal was not a joint proposal on behalf of two plaintiffs, but a proposal on behalf of one plaintiff. Therefore, the apportionment requirement of the

355 S.C. 125 (2003) 584 S.E.2d 120 COLLINS ENTERTAINMENT CORP., Respondent, v. COATS AND COATS RENTAL AMUSEMENT, d/b/a Ponderosa Bingo and Shipwatch Bingo, Wayne Coats, individually, and American Bingo & Gaming Corp., Defendants, Of whom American Bingo & Gaming Corp. is, Appellant. No. 3596. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard December 10,

639 F.Supp. 750 (1986) THRIFTY RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff, v. THRIFT CARS, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 83-1979-Y. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 15, 1986. *751 Paul H. Johnson, esq., Mead, Johnson & Stevenson, Tulsa, Okl., and William Looney, Looney & Grossman, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

POLEN, Judge. Southern Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) appeals a final judgment ordering it to pay the stipulated value of property taken from its insured, Pro Lockshop, Inc. We reverse because the trial court determined a factual'issue without a jury, despite Farm Bureau’s demand for jury trial. Pro Lockshop was incorporated by Paul Goodell and Lynn Thomas, who served as the corporation’s

329 S.C. 133 (1997) 494 S.E.2d 449 Cynthia L. LISTER and Toney J. Lister, Respondents, v. NATIONSBANK of Delaware, N.A. and Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc., Defendants, Of which Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. is Appellant. No. 2754. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard November 5, 1997. Decided November 17, 1997. R

813 A.2d 161 (2001) Edward N. JOHNSON, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 46,1999. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: June 26, 2001. Decided: October 23, 2001. Thomas A. Foley, Wilmington, for appellant. John Williams, Department of Justice, Dover, for appellee. Before VEASEY, Chief Just

891 So.2d 1109 (2004) FREEDOM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Texas corporation, Appellant, v. Kim WALLANT and Louis Borek, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Appellees. No. 4D03-866. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 29, 2004. Rehearing Denied February 17, 2005.

874 A.2d 108 (2005) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Barnswell JONES, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 12, 2004. Filed April 25, 2005. *111 John C. Carlson, Reading, for appellant. Douglas J. Waltman, Asst. Dist. Atty., Reading, for Com., appellee. Before: HUDOCK, GANTMAN, and BE

993 So.2d 614 (2008) Rafael VARGAS, Appellant, v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Elizabeth Price, and Jimmy Middleton, Appellees. No. 4D07-3929. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 31, 2008. *616 Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and Maria

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1057THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed April 4, 2018 (Doc. 58)("MJP"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Financial Indemnity

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Calhoun County for damages in the amount of $2,000 in favor of the appellee here. The action was commenced by the filing of a two count complaint alleging misrepresentation of an automobile sold to appellee by appellant. It was alleged that the 1970 Chevrolet Impala was represented to be an "executive" automobile driven by executives of the General Motors Corporation around the General Motors plant and in go

823 S.W.2d 232 (1990) Allan Wayne JANECKA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 68881. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. January 31, 1990. On Rehearing January 15, 1992. Dissenting Opinion on Rehearing January 15, 1992. Rehearing Dismissed February 12, 1992. *233</

343 F.Supp. 1284 (1972) Vincent D. ADAMS, as Administrator of the Estate of Vincent Darrel Adams, Jr., Deceased, Plaintiff, v. William Carrol HUNTER, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 71-433. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. Argued June 19, 1972. Decided June 21, 1972. *1285 Robert B. Wa

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS