Cases

Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge *754Plaintiff Glenn Kevin Hazley ("Hazley") was incarcerated at the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Moose Lake ("MCF-Moose Lake") when the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined that his sentence was unauthorized and remanded his criminal case to the district court for further proceedings. State v. Hazley , No. A1

J-S09033-22 2022 PA Super 64 JOSEPH ROY, BY AND THROUGH HIS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUARDIAN DOROTHY ROY : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : ROBERT RUE, HAMMERHEADS

LARKIN, Judge Appellant challenges the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing, in part, that respondent Minnesota Commissioner of Corrections (commissioner) exceeded his authority by using review hearings as a decision-making tool when determining whether to release appellant following his re-incarceration for violating his conditional release. We affirm. FACTS<

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the *1322Complaint for failure to state a claim, (DE 31). Plaintiff filed a Response (DE 35), to which Defendant replied (DE 37). For reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion is gran

McLeese, Associate Judge: *1134 Appellant Royale McGlenn Sr. appeals from his convictions for firearms offenses, arguing that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. I. Viewed in the li

EBINGER, District Judge. Former inmate Steven Kulkay injured himself while using industrial equipment in the workshop of a Minnesota correctional facility. Kulkay sued the Minnesota Department of Corrections and related parties alleging violations of his civil rights under, the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as negligence of prison employees. The district court

McGEE, Judge. Wesley Deland Stevens (Defendant) was convicted of assault on a child under twelve years of age and contributing to the delinquency and neglect of a minor. Defendant appeals. I. Indictment for Contributing to the Delinquency and Neglect of a Minor Defendant argues the indictment for contributing to the delinquency and neglect of a minor was fatally defective. We disagree

WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This appeal involves a long-running boundary dispute between neighbors in Pearl River County. In 2010, this Court unanimously affirmed the judgment of the chancery court establishing the boundary between the property of Roy and Donna McDonald and Donna’s mother, Ruth Bel-ton (collectively, “the McDonalds”), and the property o

*985 OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of County Court should be affirmed. During a jury trial on charges of driving while intoxicated, defendant objected to the admission into evidence of the People’s exhibit containing a record of testing of the simulator s

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 22, 2013 Session EDWARD RAGLAND, ET AL. v. ROY MORRISON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County No. 5328 William C. Cole, Chancellor by Interchange No. W2013-00540-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 10, 2013 This appeal arises from the grant of summary judgment in

—In an action to set aside a stipulation of settlement in a matrimonial action, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered June 12, 1997, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendant and against him, dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint seeking

DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE MICHAEL A. TELESCA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Pierre Roy (“Roy”) commenced this proceeding in New York State Supreme Court pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”) section 7511, seeking to vacate the Decision and Award of Arbitrator Robert J. Rabin, Esq. (“Rabin” or “Arbitrator Rabin”), dated December 1, 2014 (“the

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed June 8, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00091-CV JANE NELSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant V. NEAL DIKEMAN, SHAWN KELLY, ROY ERIKSEN, JARED WISSEL, SCOTT FORD, BILLY PIERCE, CHRISTINA FORD, CHARLIE

ORDER LEONARD DAVIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Plaintiff ROY-G-BIV Corporation’s (“ROY-G-BIV”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 362); ROY-G-BIV’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding ABB’s OPC-Related Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Docket No. 366); Defendants ABB Inc. (“ABB”), Meadwestvaco Texas, LP, and Meadwest

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Steven J. Roy appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction on the ground that he had failed to demonstrate a likelihood of succeeding on the merits of his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On appeal, Roy argues that the district court erred in denying preliminary injun

944 A.2d 466 (2008) Maxie STEVENS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 04-CM-824, 06-CO-878. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 12, 2008. Decided March 13, 2008. *467 Enid Hinkes for appellant. Heather A. Hill, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jeffrey A. Taylor, Unite

[1] In this action to have easements declared invalid, defendants, Robert D. Mannix and Frances K. Mannix, appeal from the trial court's judgment quieting title in plaintiffs, Richard Stevens, M.T. Notestine, Karen J. Notestine, T.D. Notestine, and R.T. Notestine. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. [2] The case concerns real property referred to as sites 16, 17, and 18. Condominium complexes exist on portions of sites 16 and 18. Defendants own a condominium unit on

In re Roy, Steven; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 00-2081; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-KH-1362. This application is transferred to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration pursuant to the procedures outlined in that court’s en banc resolution of September 9, 2008. See State v. Cordero, 08-1717 (La.10-3-08

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 488 (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 337 Stanley ROY, et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Respondent; Lucky Star Industries, Inc., Real Party in Interest. No. E035412. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two. March 3, 2005. *489 Law Offices of Steven

Dalianis, J. The defendant, Steven Roy, appeals a Superior Court (McHugh, J.) order denying his motion for a new trial based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. This is the second time this case has reached us on appeal. See State v. Roy, 140 N.H. 478 (1995) (Roy I). In summarizing the relevant facts of this case, we incorporate by reference the facts detai