Cases

PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: On February 13, 2013, Plaintiff 7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC-the assignee of Sheldon H. Solow-filed this action against Defendants Citigroup, Inc.; Citibank, N.A.; Bank of America Corp.; Bank of America N.A.; Barclays Bank Pic; UBS AG; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association; Credit Suisse Group AG; Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.; Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-B

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, P.J.A.D. Between 1961 and 2003, Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A., (Parmalat) grew from a regional dairy in Italy producing and distributing milk and milk products to a multi-national corporation producing and distributing food products, including dairy products. Its growth was initiated by a technique developed by it to extend the

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiffs Tara Raniere, Nichol Bodden, Mark A. Vosburgh, Steven Humphries, Mary Lara, and Bill Farmer (the “Named Plaintiffs”) have moved on behalf of the proposed Settlement Class (collectively with the Named Plaintiffs, the “Plaintiffs”) for final approval of a proposed settlement with Defendants Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., and CitiMortgage, Inc. (collectively, “Citi

856 N.E.2d 639 (2006) 368 Ill. App.3d 298 305 Ill.Dec. 834 Alon KIM, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. CITIGROUP, INC., Travelers Group, Inc., Solomon Smith Barney Holdings, Inc., Solomon Smith Barney, Inc., Primerica Financial Services, Inc., and William Lee, Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. No

SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs — a corporation, partnership, and seven grantor-retained annuity trusts (“GRATs”) controlled by Florida residents Angela and Arthur Williams — appeal from an October 30, 2013 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sidney H. Stein, Judge), dismissing their amended complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs allege that they suffered

Judge STRAUB dissents in part and concurs in part in a separate opinion. JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, participants in retirement plans offered by defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A., and covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ne

A putative plaintiff class appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Oetken, J.), denying its motion for attorney’s fees and request for discovery. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review. The denial of a fee application is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Scarangella v. Grp. Health, Inc.,

STRINE, Chief Justice: I. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certified to this Court the following question of law arising from an appeal from a decision issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York: Are the claims of a plaintiff against a corporate defendant alleging dama

652 F.3d 88 (2011) In re CITIGROUP, INC. CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN LITIGATION. Jerome Renaudin; Steven Rodemer, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.; Smith Barney Inc.; Citifinancial Inc.; Citigroup Inc.; Travelers Group Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Inc.; Primerica Financial Services, Inc., Defendants, Appellees, ABC Corps 1-100; John Does 1-100, Defendants. No. 1

353 B.R. 51 (2006) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Enron Corp., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Citigroup, Inc., et al., Defendants. Barclays PLC, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Arthur Andersen LLP, Third-Party Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-16034(AJG), Adversary No. 03-09266 A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. October 11, 2006. <

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge. These petitions ask us to decide whether two groups of defendants should be permitted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), to file an interlocutory appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denise Cote, Judge) certifying a plaintiff class. One group of defendants — Citigroup, its affiliate Salomon Smith Barney (“SSB”), and SS

WOOD, Circuit Judge. This is a case brought by a group of disappointed investors who lost millions of dollars after the shares they had purchased of SmartServ Online, Inc. (SSOL) collapsed in value. They blame their losses on John Spatz, an investment advisor, his employer, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., and the employer’s parent company, Citigroup, Inc. (collectively, Citigr

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Paulina Korenblum, Fredy Giron, and Kenneth M. Butler bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York State Labor Law (“NYLL”), N.Y. Lab, Law § 650 et seq. (See Compl. (Docket No. 1). Plai

171 F.Supp.2d 333 (2001) CITIGROUP INC. and CITICORP., Plaintiffs, v. CITY HOLDING COMPANY and City National Bank Of West Virginia, Defendants. No. 99 CIV. 10115(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 30, 2001. *334 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom by Kenneth A. Plevan, Esq., Stephanie J. Kamerow, Esq.

MEMORANDUM** Steven Yaffe appeals pro se the district court’s refusal to vacate an arbitration award. We conclude the arbitrator’s decision was not made in “manifest disregard for the law” and, accordingly, we affirm. DISCUSSION Yaffe sought arbitration after he was discharged from his job at the Smith Barney Division of the Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (“Smith Barne

598 F.3d 30 (2010) CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VCG SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LIMITED, f/k/a CDO Plus Master Fund Limited, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 08-6090-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: November 24, 2009. Decided: March 10, 2010. *31 Steven G.

MEMORANDUM** Steven Yaffe appeals pro se the district court’s refusal to vacate an arbitration award. We conclude the arbitrator’s decision was not made in “manifest disregard for the law” and, accordingly, we affirm. DISCUSSION Yaffe sought arbitration after he was discharged from his job at the Smith Barney Division of the Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (“Smith Barne

13‐4488‐cv(L) AHW Investment Partnership, et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2014

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This lawsuit arises from a contract between the plaintiff, Hindsight Solutions, LLC, (“Hindsight”) and the defendant Ci-tiMortgage, Inc. (“CitiMortgage”). Hindsight agreed to provide CitiMortgage with *750a proposal to reduce the overall maintenance costs that CitiMortgage paid annually t