Cases

BONAVITA, AUGUST, ASSOCIATE Judge. John Pitcher, the father and one of two survivors of the decedent, Christina Pitcher, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of that court’s order on the Motion for Taxation of Attorney’s Fees and Costs filed by the other survivor, Olga Waldo, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christina Pitcher, deceased. The fee award stems from a

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  CHRISTINE PITCHER,   WD82564 Respondent,  OPINION FILED: v.   M

MARING, Justice. [¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appeals from the district court’s judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer’s decision to suspend Thorsrud’s driving privileges for two years *484for driving under the influence of alcohol. A reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded that the hearing officer’s finding that Thorsrud di

BERZON, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: Martinez-Rodriguez contends that the district court erred in basing its sentencing decision on inferences without support in the record. I agree, and therefore dissent from the sentencing aspect of the disposition. The district court found that Martinez-Rodriguez was “not just a courier,” but was involved in methamphetamine distributio

[J-23-2014] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ. DAVID BRUNO AND ANGELA BRUNO, : No. 25 WAP 2013 HUSBAND AND WIFE AND ANTHONY : GOTTI BRUNO AND MCKAYLA MARIE : Appeal from the Order of the Superior BLAKE, BY THEIR PARENTS AND : Court entered July 10, 2012 at No. 1154 LEGAL GUARDIANS, DAVID BRUN

313 164 318 Or Appv. Farmers Ins. Exchange Mohabeer 2022 March 16, 2022 Argued and submitted February 11, 2021, reversed and remanded March 16, 2022 Ajay MOHABEER, Plaintiff-Respond

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge, with whom Chief Judge JACOBS, Judge RAGGI, Judge WESLEY, Judge HALL, and Judge LIVINGSTON join, dissenting: This appeal raises important questions of first impression in our Circuit — and indeed, in the nation — regarding the application of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and Title VII’s prohibition on discriminatory employment pract

242 F.Supp.2d 993 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Viktor MASCAK, Jamie Mascak, and Beatrice Lowe, Defendants. No. CR 01-512-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon. January 24, 2003. *994 Michael W. Mosman, United States Attorney, Fredric N. Weinhouse, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, for Plaintiff.<

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts. We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in the thorough, thoughtful, and well-reasoned opinion of the court below. In this case, the Civil Service Board found itself in the unfortunate position of having no good al

Perkins, J. In 1853, Abijah W. Pitcher and eight other persons became sureties of Robert L. Browning in the sum of about 6,000 dollars. To indemnify those sureties, Browning executed to them, jointly, a mortgage on the furniture in the Madison hotel. The mortgage was duly recorded. The sureties paid, in nearly equal sums severally, the 6,000 dollars owed by Browning. Browning seems su

Per curiam: (En banc). Except as the ordinance of the City and County of Denver, No. 223, Series of 1913, may inhibit the issuance of a license to keep a saloon within a specified distance of designated places, the Excise Commissioner is invested with a sound judicial discretion, to be exercised in view of all the facts and circumstances of each particular case, as to granting or refusing a license to ke

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice, dissenting. [¶ 71] I respectfully dissent. Section 52-06-04(2), N.D.C.C., is, I believe, ambiguous. The legislative history of the amendments to the statute is no less ambiguous as illustrated by the majority opinion and Justice Sandstrom’s dissenting opinion. It is particularly in this circumstance that I defer to the interpretation of the statute by the agency charged with its executi

PER CURIAM: We withdraw our Summary Order of February 15, 2008. Ricci v. DeStefano, 264 Fed-Appx. 106 (2d Cir.2008). Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts. We affirm

228 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ronald Leroy McKINLEY; Tony Gilbert, Jr.; Angelo Fuentes, Defendants. No. CR.01-291-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon. January 30, 2002. *1159 Michael W. Mosman, United States Attorney, Billy J. Williams, Assistant United State Attorney, Portland, for the

Davison, J. Suit by the appellant against the appellees for an injunction. The case made by the complaint is as follows: Jaohman was the auditor, and Pogue the treasurer of Jefferson county. The auditor, in September, 1857, certified and delivered to Pogxie, as treasurer, a tax duplicate, containing a list of taxes, purporting to have been assessed upon real estate in said

392 F.3d 691 Steven Van McHONE, Petitioner — Appellant,v.Marvin POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent — Appellee. No. 04-14. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: September 28, 2004. Decided: December 28, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT

LeBLANC, Judge. Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Steven M. Bertini, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their wrongful death claim against defendant, Patrick J. Canulette, in his capacity as Sheriff of St. Tammany Parish. The issue on appeal is whether a constructive seizure of a vacant lot pursuant to a writ of fieri facias gives a sheriff custody of the property seized within the meaning of La.C.C. art. 2317. Concluding th

PITCHER, Judge. Perry and Linda LeJeune (plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court judgment which sustained the peremptory exception of no cause of action filed by defendant, Dr. Edwin Walker, in his capacity as Coroner of the Parish of Livingston, and dismissed plaintiffs’ suit against Dr. Walker. FACTS On Saturday, July 27, 1991, at approximately 11:30 p.m., the plaintiffs’

LeBLANC, Judge. This appeal is from a district court judgment overruling a declinatory exception raising the objection of no subject matter jurisdiction, a dilatory exception raising the objection of prematurity, and a peremptory exception raising the objection of no right of action. We affirm. *763Sydney Joseph Klingman, Jr., plaintiff-appellee, a

REYNA, Circuit Judge. The International Trade Commission entered a limited exclusion order against Ar-ista Networks, Inc. based on its final determination that Arista infringed three of Cisco Systems, Inc.’s patents. The Commission also determined that Arista did not infringe two other Cisco patents. The exclusion order excluded entry into the United St