Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Steven Paul Rial”
State of Maine v. Steven Edwardspublic domain
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 55 Docket: Som-23-326 Argued: May 9, 2024 Decided: August 1, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. STEVEN EDWARDS STANFILL, C.J. [¶1] Following a jury trial,
United States v. Parr, Steven J.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 06-3300 & 06-3457 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. S TEVEN J. P ARR, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. Ap
State of Tennessee v. Paul Rogerspublic domain
11/20/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 28, 2025 Session1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PAUL ROGERS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 127721 Steven W. Sword, Judge ___________
Vodovskaia-Scandura v. Hartford Headache Center, LLCpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
202 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2000) PAUL N. BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellee,v.ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellant. No. 98-36190 PAUL N. BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellee. No. 99-35035
People v. Taylorpublic domain
People v Taylor (2018 NY Slip Op 05872) People v Taylor 2018 NY Slip Op 05872 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
State v. Miltonpublic domain
OPINION ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice. On February 1, 2011, the Hennepin County District Court convicted Javaris *794Eugene Milton of one count of first-degree felony murder and one count of attempted first-degree felony murder. The court then sentenced Milton to: (1) life imprisonment with the possibility of parole for the murder of Dontae Johnson, a
Hassel, R. v. Franzi, J.public domain
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: *943 Appellant in this medical malpractice case Robert Hassel, both individually and in his capacity as administrator of the estate of Mary Hassel, deceased (hereinafter "Appellant") appeals from the judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia C
109 B.R. 968 (1989) In re KAISER STEEL CORP., et al., Debtor. KAISER STEEL CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Joseph A. FRATES, et al., Defendants. KAISER STEEL CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Monty RIAL, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-K-1379, Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1552E. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 15, 1989. H. Thomas Coghill, Dav
105 B.R. 971 (1989) In re KAISER STEEL CORP., et al., Debtors. KAISER STEEL CORP., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Joseph A. FRATES, et al., Defendants/Appellants. KAISER STEEL CORP., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Monty RIAL, et al., Defendants/Appellants. Nos. 89-K-570, 89-K-571, Bankruptcy No. 87-B-1552-E, Adv. Nos. 87-E-135, 87-E-437. United States District Court, D. Colorado.
Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable Murphypublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. The Honorable Thomas M. Murphy, retired Judge of District Court, challenges the recommendation of the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards that he receive a public reprimand for attempting to influence the testimony of a witness in the Board’s investigation into his conduct and for his ex parte handling of a traffic ticket belonging to the son of an administrative clerk employed by th
People v. Goondallpublic domain
People v Goondall (2019 NY Slip Op 04721) People v Goondall 2019 NY Slip Op 04721 Decided on June 12, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Valenen Collins v. Sams East, Inc.public domain
03/13/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 21, 2018 Session VALENEN COLLINS v. SAMS EAST INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003667-16 Rhynette N. Hurd, Judge ___________________________________
Willie T. Freeney, Jr. v. Michael W. Flowerspublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-24-00079-CV WILLIE T. FREENEY, JR., ET AL., Appellants V. MICHAEL W. FLOWERS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-298 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Ju
Tobinick v. Novellapublic domain
ROBIN L. ROSENBERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT NOVELLA’S OMNIBUS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND DENYING BONA AND GOTT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Steven Novella, M.D.’s Omnibus Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [DE 292] and Jarod M. Bona and *1334Aaron R.
Jamie M. Cooper v. Bradley Cooperpublic domain
07/22/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 9, 2024 Session JAMIE M. COOPER v. BRADLEY COOPER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Henry County No. 25212 Vicki Hodge Hoover, Chancellor ______________________
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Panhorst v. Panhorstpublic domain
[Cite as Panhorst v. Panhorst, 2019-Ohio-126.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) TERESA J. PANHORST C.A. No. 28959 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE GREGORY A.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Morgan v. Statepublic domain
By the Court, DOUGLAS, C. J.: *217In this appeal, we consider whether the district court made multiple errors from the time it held the competency hearing for appellant John Demon Morgan to when it entered a judgment of conviction. In particular, after first considering whether the district court erred with respect to Morgan's competency hearin