Cases

USCA11 Case: 15-10958 Date Filed: 10/03/2022 Page: 1 of 81 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15-10958 ____________________ MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross Appellee, ver

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) ■ the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation and Certification of Class for Settlement Purposes, filed July 23, 2012 (Doc. 391)(“Motion for Final Approval”); and (ii) Co-Lead Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Memo

B Plaintiffs next focus on ordinary severability principles. Applying those principles, the question before the Court is whether (i) to invalidate the entire 1991 robocall restriction, as plaintiffs want, or (ii) to invalidate just the 2015 government-debt exception and sever it from the remainder of the statute, as the Government wants. We agree with the Government that w

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: When can a breach of contract also support a claim for fraud? This question— long an issue in common-law courts— comes before us in the context of a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, /.), imposing civil penalties exceeding $1.2 billion on Defendants-Appellants Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; Countrywi

OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: This case involves complex retrocessional agreements between Plaintiff Munich Reinsurance America Inc. (“Munich”) and Defendant American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”). Munich filed a Complaint alleging breach of contract for ANICO’s refusal to pay certain claims submitted for payment by Munich under the parties’ agreements, and in response, ANI-CO filed a countercla

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–0298 Filed January 8, 2016 BEN VILLARREAL JR., CLEO MARTINEZ, and LaCASA MARTINEZ TEXMEX, INC., Appellants, vs. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY d/b/a UNITED FIRE GROUP, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Rustin T. Davenport, Judge. An insurer seeks further review of a cou

Judge STRAUB concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This ease concerns the tremendous property damage caused by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Just months before the attacks, in April 2001, World Trade Center Properties LLC and affiliated companies (‘WTCP”)1 obtained 99-year leases for 1, 2, 4, and 5 World T

ACCEPTED 14-13-00502-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/5/2015 11:48:34 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–0298 Filed January 8, 2016 Amended April 6, 2016 BEN VILLARREAL JR., CLEO MARTINEZ, and LaCASA MARTINEZ TEXMEX, INC., Appellants, vs. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY d/b/a UNITED FIRE GROUP, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Rustin T. Davenport, Judge.

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 84 In the Matter of Part 60 Put-Back Litigation. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, &c., Respondent, v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, &c., et al., Appellan

ORDER DENYING: (1) TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND (2) M & I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BETH A. BUCHANAN, Bankruptcy Judge. This case involves first and second mortgages relating to the debtors’ residence, each of which recites the correct street address for the two adjoining parcels of land making up the debtors’ residence but contains inconsistent refere

328 B.R. 274 (2005) In re AMERICAN BRIDGE PRODUCTS, INC., Debtor. Lynne Riley, Chapter 7 Trustee of American Bridge Products, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Nicholas J. Decoulos, Esq., Decoulos & Decoulos, Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, and Michael Gilleran, Esq. Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96-16620-JNF, Adversary No. 00-1142. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. June

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Opposed Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Greenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc. (n/k/a RBS Acceptance Inc.), Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II, Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, *1097RBS Securities Inc. (f/

193 Ill. App.3d 223 (1990) 550 N.E.2d 8 MARGARETTEN & COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD MARTINEZ et al., Defendants-Appellants (Kailish Prasad et al., Third-Party Purchasers-Appellees. No. 2-89-0426. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed January 16, 1990. *224 W. Randal

254 P.3d 835 (2011) 161 Wash.App. 474 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,[*] v. LIBERTY CAPITAL STARPOINT EQUITY FUND, LLC; Respondent. Norcon Builders, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. GMP Homes VG, LLC; Insaf Oraivej; Ward A. Baugher, Jr. and Grace Baugher, individually and the marital community composed therein; Jeffrey D. and Alice Abercrombie, individuall

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

968 F.Supp. 1548 (1997) Erick BARBOSA and Rossana Canechia, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET MORTGAGE CORPORATION, and Princeton Financial Corporation, Defendants. No. 94-1938-CIV-RYSKAMP. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 24, 1997. *1549

89 P.3d 47 (2004) 135 N.M. 375 2004-NMSC-009 STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. Eluid L. MARTINEZ, State Engineer, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant-Petitioner. No. 22,283. Supreme Court of New Mexico. April 7, 2004. *48 White, Koch, Kelly & McCarthy, P.A., Paul L.

874 P.2d 352 (1994) AMERICAN WATER DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Colorado corporation, Applicant-Appellant, v. CITY OF ALAMOSA; County of Alamosa; Alexander Ranch; Darell Keith Alexander; Richard Angell; Baca Grande Water & Sanitation District; Fred Bauder; Harold L. Bennett; Richard Blumenhein; Bonanza Road Water Users, Owners and Objectors; Lena C. Chiles; Floyd D. Chiles; Terry R. Chiles; Cyril Clayton; Dave Collins; David P. Collins; Barbara J. Co

OPINION & ORDER PIERAS, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendants’ Special Appearance Requesting Quashing of Summons and Request for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint or File Responsive Pleading as to Co-Defendants Suzanne Laforet and Juan A. Aponte (docket No. 5); Special Appearance Requesting Quashing of Summons as to Co-defendant Amari Arabia (docket No