Cases

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAN 14 2009 Clerk, U.S. District and Eric Adams, ) Bankrup'tcy Courts

OPINION AND ORDER Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J. Salvador J. Parra, Jr. (“Parra”) developed asbestosis and other conditions after he was exposed to asbestos while working as an insulator in the 1960s and 1970s. In 2009, he sued Marsh USA, Inc. (“Marsh”), an insurance broker, and others alleging that they had conspired with asbestos producers, distributors, and insurers to withhold information from the public

Chapter 11 Cases ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEBTOR’S AMENDED MOTION [ECF 9518] FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON TOUSA’S OBJECTION TO CLAIM 7574 OF SUPERIOR HOMES AND INVESTMENTS, INC., AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE ON JANUARY 28, 2014 John K. Olson, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court This matter came before the Court for hearing on the Debtor’s Amended Motion [ECF 9518] for Summary Judgment on Obj

Dr. John K. Baillie petitions for review of an adjudication of the Public School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS), which ordered him to return $79,083.39 in retirement annuity payments that he had received. PSERS found that Baillie, with the support of his employer, the Chester County Intermediate Unit, had manipulated the terms of his employment so as to increase the amount of his retirement annuity and to have it paid while still employed, which was improper under the Public Sch

OPINION Per Curiam: These consolidated water appropriation cases present two issues of statutory construction in the context of a motion for a peremptory challenge and a motion for a change of venue. Specifically, *1027the appellants and petitioner ask this court to interpret the words and' the phrase “appealed from a lower court” in SC

614 N.E.2d 904 (1993) 245 Ill. App.3d 1077 185 Ill.Dec. 463 David M. LUCIANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAUBONSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant (Tammy Abell, Indiv. and as Agent for Waubonsee Community College, Defendant-Appellee). No. 2-92-1095. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. June 3, 1993.

811 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2011) FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP., Plaintiff, v. Ronnie DUKE, Ryan Zundel, Bill Wells, Willinevah Richardson, Anthony Peters, American Nationwide Mortgage Co., CBB, Inc. d/b/a Bretlin Home Mortgage, First Escrow Company, LLC, Hardcore Motor Sports, LLC, Hardcore Racing, INC. JS Realty, LLC, Lawyers Escrow Co., Libertytitle and Escrow Services, LLC, MotorCity Financial Services, Nations Title of Ohio, North American Home Funding

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRITTNEY COLLINS, Defendant and Appellant. S279737 Second Appellate District, Division Five B322744 Kern County Superior Court MF013183B January 6, 2025 J

ORDER ALAIMO, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................249 DISCUSSION..................................................................251 I. Theories of Liability in the Case ..............................................251 A. Failure to Disclose

OPINION Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 [148 Cal.Rptr. 379, 582 P.2d 970], held that lender enforcement of a due-on-sale clause, contained in a deed of trust or promissory note secured by real property, constitutes an unreasonable restraint on alienation unless the lender can demonstrate that enforcement is reasonably necessary t

211 N.J. Super. 602 (1986) 512 A.2d 531 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SHARON WEILER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 11, 1986. Decided July 3, 1986. *604 Before Judges FRITZ, GAYNOR and BAIME. Roy B. Greenman argued the cause

121 Cal.App.3d 328 (1981) 175 Cal. Rptr. 467 REGINALD D. DE LA CUESTA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FIDELITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. ALPHONSO MOORE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FIDELITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. JOHN D. WHITCOMBE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FIDELITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSO

The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D. Defendant appeals from his conviction of the purposeful and knowing murder of his wife. Defendant’s previous conviction for this same crime resulted in a reversal on appeal and a remand for a new trial. On this second appeal, defendant raises the following points of error: I. THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSED

254 N.J. Super. 571 (1992) 604 A.2d 147 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CARL GRANT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 11, 1992. Decided March 4, 1992. *573 Before Judges O'BRIEN, HAVEY and CONLEY. John Vincent Saykanic, Design

115 N.J. Super. 555 (1971) 280 A.2d 499 ANTHONY F. PESSINI, PLAINTIFF, v. MARY MASSIE, GEORGE VANARELLI AND NEW JERSEY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, DEFENDANTS. MARY MASSIE EBERHARDT AND WILLIAM EBERHARDT, PLAINTIFFS, v. GEORGE VANARELLI AND NEW JERSEY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided July 30,

458 U.S. 141 (1982) FIDELITY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. DE LA CUESTA ET AL. No. 81-750. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued April 28, 1982. Decided June 28, 1982. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT *142 Ernest Leff argued the cause for appe

The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, P.J.A.D. At issue in this criminal appeal is: (1) whether defendant was deprived of a fair trial where the trial judge denied defendant’s request to be present during an in camera voir dire of prospective jurors, and the voir dire was conducted after defendant had exercised all of his peremptory challenges; and (2) whether the judge erred i

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

106 N.J. 13 (1987) 524 A.2d 130 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD BIEGENWALD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 5, 1985. Decided March 5, 1987. *17 Glen J. Vida, Union, argued the cause for appellant. James Fagen, Assistant Prosec