Cases

760 F.Supp.2d 811 (2011) Steven CARLSON, Mary Graznow, Richard Kettells, and William Ramsey, Plaintiffs, v. Justice David WIGGINS,[1] in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Jean Dickson, Steven J. Pace, Beth Walker, Amy J. Skogerson, Joseph L. Fitzgibbons, Guy R. Cook, and H. Daniel Holm, Jr., in their official capacities as Elective Members of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Margare

675 F.3d 1134 (2012) Steven CARLSON; Mary Granzow; Richard Kettells; William Ramsey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Justice David WIGGINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Jean Dickson; Steven J. Pace; Beth Walker; Amy J. Skogerson; Joseph L. Fitzgibbons; Guy R. Cook; H. Daniel Holm, Jr., in their official capacities as Elective Members of the State Judicial Nominating Commission; Margaret G. Redenbaugh

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STEVEN WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-1418 [July 29, 2021] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial C

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinio

Owens, J. ¶1 Klein Honda is a Honda dealership. It purchases vehicles from Honda at wholesale and sells them at retail. From time to time, Honda offers a “dealer cash” incentive program for its dealerships. Under that program, dealerships can earn dealer cash (i.e., a specific amount of extra money) if they sell specific Honda models during specific times and comply with other terms and conditions. ¶2 This case

Kurtz, J. William Wiggins was convicted of unlawful possession of explosives pursuant to RCW 70.74.022(1). This provision states that it is unlawful “to manufacture, purchase, sell, offer for sale, use, possess, transport, or store any explosive, improvised device, or components that are intended to be assembled into an explosive or improvised device” without having a valid license. When apprehended by police, Mr. Wiggins was car

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1248 Filed April 21, 2017 LYLE H. ABBAS, F. DOW BATES, BRADLEY J. BROWN, SIDNEY E. CARTER, BRAD CHICOINE, RUSSELL J. COX, PAUL D. EBERLINE, JOSEPH N. GEELAN, RICHARD W. HAAS, REX J. JONES, KEITH L. KLEMME, ELIZABETH C. KRESSIN, STEVEN J. KRAUS, MARK A. KRUSE, RODNEY D. LANGEL, RONALD O. MASTERS II, KEVIN MILLER, STEVEN A. MUELLER, MARK A. NILES, VALORIE J. PRAHL, JENNIFER A. RASMUSSEN, RO

539 U.S. 510 WIGGINSv.SMITH, WARDEN, et al. No. 02-311. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 24, 2003. Decided June 26, 2003. In 1989, petitioner Wiggins was convicted of capital murder by a Maryland judge and subsequently elected to be sentenced by a jury. His public defende

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-0539 ____________ STEVEN J. LORENZO, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. June 19, 2025 PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from two judgments of conviction of

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1374 ___________ Steven Carlson; Mary Granzow; Richard Kettells; William Ramsey, * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v.

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW On June 24, 1987, Steven Kelley was an inmate at Folsom Prison, in the Security Housing Unit. The unit was in a lockdown state. Workers from Lawson Mechanical Contractor (“Lawson”) were working on the air supply ducts. Kelley complained to California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) Officers Hudson and Ferryance that fum

WIGGINS, Justice. On further review, a spouse asks us to determine the fairness of a property distribution and the denial of attorney fees. The court of appeals affirmed the district court decision by upholding the award of an equalization payment, but modified the decision by reducing the amount of the equalization payment from $45,468 to $5000. Additionally, the court of appeals

J-S52005-20 2021 PA Super 57 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MATTHEW WIGGINS :

J-S52005-20 2021 PA Super 57 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MATTHEW WIGGINS :

Garry, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cerio Jr., J.), entered January 17, 2012 in Tompkins County, which, among other things, granted plaintiffs motion to compel certain disclosure. *1133In October 2004, a client retained the law firm of Wiggins & Masson, LLfi in which plaintiff was a partner, to represent him in a legal malpractice

Garry, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cerio Jr., J.), entered January 17, 2012 in Tompkins County, which, among other things, granted plaintiffs motion to compel certain disclosure. *1133In October 2004, a client retained the law firm of Wiggins & Masson, LLfi in which plaintiff was a partner, to represent him in a legal malpractice

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Earneka Wiggins v. Hackensack Meridian Health (A-43-23) (089441) Argued November 4, 2024 -- Decided January 22, 2025 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In this medical malpractice appeal

882 S.W.2d 8 (1994) TEXAS STATE OPTICAL, INC., Appellant, v. David WIGGINS, O.D., Katherine Kernek, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Dr. D.P. Kernek, Kernek Optical, Inc., Huntsville Eye Associates, Inc., Universal Surety of America, and Dr. Ralph G. Berkeley, M.D. and Associates, D/B/A Houston Eye Clinic, Appellees. Nos. 01-92-01006-CV, 01-93-00273-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston

Stein, J. Appeal from those parts of an order of the Supreme Court (Cerio Jr., J.), entered February 25, 2011 in Tompkins County, which, among other things, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment declaring that an addendum to a partnership agreement is unambiguous and enforceable. In January 2007, plaintiff and defendant Edward E. Kopko— both experienced attorneys — entered into a partnership agreem

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3847-22 EARNEKA WIGGINS and LYNDA MYERS, as administratrixes of the estate of APRIL CARDEN, deceased, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION April 18, 2024 Pl