Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Steven Hein”
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2026 WY 33 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2025 March 10, 2026 RONALD W. HEIN and LINDA M. HEIN, Appellants (Defendants), v. S-25-0168 STEVEN PAUL CARLSON and PAULETTE JOAN CARLSON; and CLARENCE LEE DANIELS and MARY JO DANIELS, Appellees
United States v. Hein (Steven Paul)public domain
971 F.2d 752 U.S.v.Hein (Steven Paul) NO. 92-1153 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Feb 10, 1992 1 Appeal From: D.Minn. 2 AFFIRMED.
Steven R. Perry v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION ROBB, Judge. Case Summary and Issue Steven R. Perry appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for credit time for time spent on electronic monitoring as a drug court program participant. Perry frames the issue as whether Indiana jurisprudence should be modified to adopt a single analysis for awarding cred
Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.public domain
127 S.Ct. 2553 (2007) Jay F. HEIN, Director, White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, et al., Petitioners, v. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al. No. 06-157. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 28, 2007. Decided June 25, 2007. *2558 Paul D. Clement, Washington, D.C., for
State ex rel. Sponaugle v. Hein (Slip Opinion)public domain
Per Curiam. *560 {¶ 1} Appellant, Steven Sponaugle, appeals the judgment of the Second District Court of Appeals denying his complaint for writs of prohibition and procedendo against appellee, Darke County Court of Common Pleas Judge Jonathan P. Hein. For the reasons
Knebel v. Heinpublic domain
429 U.S. 288 (1977) KNEBEL, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE v. HEIN. No. 75-1261. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 29, 1976. Decided January 11, 1977.[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. Stephen L. Urbanczyk argued the cause pro hac vice for appellant in No. 75-1261. Wit
United States v. Steven Heckepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2384 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVEN J. HECKE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Norther
Steven Catlin v. Ronald Broomfieldpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVEN CATLIN, No. 19-99011 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:07-cv-01466- v. LJO-SAB RONALD BROOMFIELD, Warden, OPINION San Quentin State Prison, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for th
United States v. Steven Davispublic domain
*1025 SMITH, Chief Judge. Steven Davis was convicted of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Davis appeals, arguing that the district court 2 erred in denying his motion to suppress, motions in limine, motion for mistrial, motion for judg
FARMER (STEVEN) VS. STATEpublic domain
133 Nev., Advance Opinion Flot IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA STEVEN DALE FARMER, No. 65935 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
FARMER (STEVEN) VS. STATEpublic domain
133 Nev., Advance Opinion Flot IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA STEVEN DALE FARMER, No. 65935 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
Steven Davenport v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jun 07 2018, 7:37 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing
Patrick Collins v. Steven Mnuchin, Secretarpublic domain
Case: 17-20364 Document: 00515108825 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 6, 2019 No. 17-20364
Veronica Rae Chavez Vara v. Mark Steven Vara, Sr.public domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § VERONICA RAE CHAVEZ VARA, No. 08-17-00101-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Heinpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 24, 2004 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER KEVAN HEIN Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 68318 Richard R. Baumgartner, Judge No. E2003-01793-CCA-R3-CD June 9, 2004 The defendant, Christopher K
Siratu v. Diane Investment Grour Ltd.public domain
679 S.E.2d 359 (2009) SIRATU v. DIANE INVESTMENT GROUP, LTD. No. A09A0828. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 28, 2009. *360 Melesse Siratu, pro se. Fowler, Hein, Passino & Cheatwood, J. Steven Cheatwood, Atlanta, for appellee. JOHNSON, Presiding Judge. In this dispossessory action, Melesse Siratu, acting p
Cynthia L. Martin, Judge David A. Hein (“Brother”) appeals a judgment that sanctioned him for discovery violations by striking his answer and affirmative defenses and that entered judgment in favor of Mary Lu Brown (“Sister”) on one of two counts in Sister’s petition seeking the discovery of assets in a probate proceeding. Brother also appeals from an order granting Sister’s mot
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 11, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00504-CV DANUEL R. STANGER AND STEVEN PETERSON, Appellants V. DEREK LOETZERICH, AS RECEIVER FOR AND ON BEHALF OF JUDGMENT CREDITOR RITA MULLINS, Appellee On Appeal from the 157th District Court Ha
State of Indiana v. Justin Bazanpublic domain
BARNES, Judge. Case Summary [1] In this interlocutory appeal, the State of Indiana appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss filed by Justin Bazan regarding the charges of Level 6 felony operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person with a prior conviction within five years and Level. 6 felony operating a vehicle while intoxicat
Adam Horton v. State of Indianapublic domain
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 79A02-1410-CR-765 RUSH, Chief Justice. The Indiana Constitution guarantees the right to jury trial, which may be waived by one, and only one, person — the defendant. Unless the defendant personally communicates to the judge a desire to waive that right, he must receive