Cases

O’Connor, C J. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the relators-appellees are entitled to writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court to vacate prior transfer orders and adjudicate their claims on the merits. For the reasons that follow, we must answer that question in the negative. Therefore, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and deny relators’ request for the

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. A former employee who claims he was discharged for reporting his employer’s illegal activity seeks to bring a wrongful-discharge claim under a public-policy exception to his at-will employment status. Because the former employee participated in the

O’Connor, C.J. {¶ 1} Jonathan N. Garver, counsel for defendant John Moore Jr. in the underlying case, has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court under R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Steven E. Gall from presiding over any further proceedings in case No. CR-00-392440-A, now pending for a resentencing hearing in the Co

KATZMANN, Circuit Judge: Joseph Gall, defendant-appellant, appeals from orders of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut .(Alan H. Nevas, Judge), directing him to make restitution in the amount of $13,-717,630, pursuant to the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (“VWPA”), as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664 (1999), and denying recon

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice. Plaintiffs and appellants (Wittmeiers) appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants and appellees (Galls). We affirm. In 1979 the Galls initiated a lawsuit seeking to prevent the Wittmeiers from draining surface waters from the Wittmeiers’ land over the Galls’ land. This lawsuit was terminated in favor of the Wittmeiers. The Wit

James J. Sweeney, Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jamal Anderson, appeals his convictions of multiple offenses stemming from a high-speed car chase and subsequent car crash involving the police. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. *526 The Chase

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Dedrick Divens, appeals his guilty plea as invalid. After a thorough review of the arguments and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm. {¶ 2} On November 25, 2003, appellant was indicted on four counts charging alternative theories for aggravated murder,1 in violation of R.C. 2903.01

[Cite as State ex rel. McCall v. Gall, 2017-Ohio-8234.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105972 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. TONY McCALL RELATOR

[Cite as State ex rel. Young v. Gall, 2014-Ohio-1441.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100919 STATE EX REL., EVANGELIST A. YOUNG RELATOR

[Cite as State ex rel. Atwater v. Gall, 2014-Ohio-3928.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101483 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JOSEPH ATWATER REL

O'Connor, C.J. *1226{¶ 1} Defendant, Joy L. Marshall, has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court under R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Steven Gall from presiding over any further proceedings in the above-referenced case in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. {¶ 2} Ms. Marshall, however, filed her affi

[Cite as State ex rel. Yeaples v. Gall, 2013-Ohio-2207.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99454 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., DONALD YEAPLES AND DEBRA YEAPLES RELATORS

2007 UT App 85 State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Leonard Preston Gall, Defendant and Appellant. Case No. 20040540-CA. Utah Court of Appeals. Filed March 22, 2007. James B. Gottstein, Anchorage, Alaska, and Nathan N. Jardine, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and Christopher D. Ballard, Salt Lake City, for Appellee. Before Judges

LAY, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Linda Gall 1 brought suit against defendants South Branch National Bank of South Dakota (the Bank) and Dennis Amdahl, a loan officer with the Bank, alleging fraud, conversion, improper debt collection practices, and malicious prosecution. The district court

Cohen, J. After a fifteen-day jury-waived trial in the Superior Court, the defendant was convicted of one count of larceny by false pretenses of an amount over $250, in violation of G. L. c. 266, § 30, and twenty-five counts of uttering forged instruments, in violation of G. L. c. 267, § 5. These charges, and *279others,1 arose from the defend

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. In two cases argued on the same day last Term we considered the standard that courts of appeals should apply when reviewing the reasonableness of sentences imposed by district judges. The first, Rita v. United States, 551 U. S. 338 (2007), involved a sentence within the range recommended

[Cite as State ex rel. Shepherd v. Gall, 2025-Ohio-5416.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL., DAJOHN D. : SHEPHERD, : Relator, : v.

[Cite as State ex rel. Annayan v. Gall, 2026-Ohio-471.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL.DAVID ANNAYAN, : Relator, : No. 115966 v. : THE HONORABLE STEVEN

JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Steven Metro appeals from the 46-month sentence of imprisonment imposed by the District Court as a consequence of his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to violate federal securities laws and one count of insider trading. He contends that the Court wrongly attributed to him illicit financial gains actually attributable to someone with whom he was not acting i

FAIR, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. After Steven Galle was fired by the Isle of Capri Casino, he brought a suit against it and.various people in its employ, alleging numerous causes of action. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment contending that Galle could not sustain the suit because he was an at-will employee. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment on all of Galle’s claims. We conclude