Cases

VandeWalle, Chief Justice. [¶1] Steven Nelson, individually and for the benefit of J&S Nelson Farms, LLP, appealed from a judgment determining the value of his interest in the Nelson Farms partnership and an order denying his post-judgment motions. Steven Nelson argues the district court erred by ordering various sanctions and determining the value of the partnership. We conclude th

OPINION CHUTICH, Justice. A Le Sueur County jury found appellant Jonas David Nelson, then 18 years old, guilty of first-degree premeditated murder, second-degree intentional murder, and second-degree felony murder for the January 6, 2014, killing of his father, Richard Nelson. The district court sentenced Nelson to life in prison without the possibility

Quinn-Brintnall, J. ¶1 — Charity Meade’s personal injury suit was dismissed on summary judgment because her attorney, David Nelson, failed to timely serve the opposing party within the statute of limitations. Following this, Nelson hired attorney Christopher Tompkins to settle a potential malpractice suit against Nelson and his firm, Nelson Law Firm PLLC. Despite considerable discussion with Tompkins and a clear understanding tha

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER AS TO APPLICABILITY OF EXCEPTION TO COLORADO RECREATIONAL USE STATUTE Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION James Nelson was seriously injured in a bicycle accident on September 3, 2008, *1140when he encountered a sinkhole/washout on a bike pa

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. *1246 In 2008, Mr. James Nelson was seriously injured while riding his bicycle on United States Air Force Academy land. He and his wife, Elizabeth Varney, 1 sued the Academy under the Federal Tort Claims Ac

OPINION OF THE COURT BY GINOZA, J. In the eight criminal cases that are part of this appeal, a bail bond was executed by a bail agent, the defendant failed to appear in court as required under the bond, and a bail forfeiture judgment was issued pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 804-51 (2014). The primary question in the appeal is whether the notice to the “surety” about the bail forfeiture judgment,

CARAWAY, J. hln this workers’ compensation action, summary judgment was granted against the employer and the insolvent insurer’s successor, Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (“LIGA”), in favor of the employee who contested the termination of *1222his benefits after 19 years of voluntary payments. Defendants claimed that the wage payments made were for supple

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge. James Nelson was seriously injured bike riding when he encountered a sinkhole on a bike path on United States Air Force Academy land. He sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act for damages and was awarded over $7 million. The government contends that it is immune from liability under the Colorado Recreational Use Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 33-41-101

MEMORANDUM ** Candie Jill Nelson appeals pro se from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate *66Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of her chapter 13 case because her plan was not proposed in good faith. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review the decision of the BAP de novo, the bankruptcy court’s findi

HORTON, Justice. This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment dismissing John Kugler’s case. Ku-gler sought damages from Ron Nelson, David Powers, Steven Kenison, William Armstrong, and Powers Candy Co., Inc. (collectively “the Defendants”), alleging breach of various agreements and wrongful actions taken by the Defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER, Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge This case, arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), involves a premises liability claim under the Colorado Premises Liability Act (“CPLA”) against the United States. It arises from a bicycle accident of Plaintiff James Nelson on property of the United States Air Force Academy. Plaintiffs clai

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge In this putative class action against Nelson Westerberg, Inc., Newesco, Inc., Nelson Westerberg International (collectively “Newesco”), and Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Thomas Mervyn alleges violations of 49 C.F.R. § 376.12, a provision of the Truth-in-Leasing regulations.promulgated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrat

OPINION Justice INDEGLIA, for the Court. Airbags are a relatively modern safety feature in passenger vehicles; they are designed to deploy in the event of a collision. When the airbags in a stationary vehicle unexpectedly deploy, as they did in this case, something has gone wrong. The question presented in this appeal is whether the

Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Judge In this putative class action against Nelson Westerberg, Inc., Newesco, Inc., Nelson Westerberg International (collectively “Newesco”), and Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Thomas Mervyn alleges violations of 49 C.F.R. § 376.12, a provision of the Truth-in-Leasing regulations promulgated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to impl

226 S.W.3d 923 (2007) Jack W. CAROLAN, Appellant, v. William J. NELSON, Respondent. No. WD 66930. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 3, 2007. *924 David P. Chamberlain, Liberty, MO, for Appellant. Steven C. Effertz, Independence, MO, for Respondent. Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR.,

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [111] JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge This case arises out of the murder of Shelly Hilliard (a transgender woman, née Henry Hilliard). The decédent’s mother *730Lyniece Nelson brought substantive due process, wrongful death, and interference with familial relations claim

GORMAN, J. [¶ 1] Tracy Nelson and Michelle James, in their capacities as personal representatives of the Estate of Jean Paul St. Amand, appeal from a judgment entered in *572the Superior Court (York County, Fritz-sche, J.) ordering that one-third of the settlement proceeds resulting from the Estate’s wrongful death claim be paid for the benefit of Debra Calli

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GEORGE Z. SINGAD, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #40). As explained herein, after reviewing all relevant filings, including the Joint Stipulation (Docket # 38), Plaintiffs Statement of Additional Material Facts (Docket # 56) and supporting affidavits, and Defendant’s Reply Statement of Material Facts (Docket # 69) an

OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. called plaintiff Heather Nelson’s cellular telephone number more than 1000 times over the course of a year in an attempt to collect a debt on two vehicles plaintiff had financed. In May 2010 defen*922dant Santander repossessed one of those vehicles. (Plaintif

761 F.Supp.2d 1312 (2011) Robert GARRETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NELSON AND AFFILIATES, LLC, et al., Defendants. JCI General Contractors, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs v. Circle City Glass, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:10cv23-WHA. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. January 25, 2011.