Cases

NO. 12-12-00107-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JOHN FLOWERS, § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CITY OF DIBOLL, TEXAS, STEVE BAKER AND KENT HAVARD, APPELLEES § ANGELINA COUN

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-24-00377-CR STEVE WAYNE BAKER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-F202300259

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02-00127-CV

HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge: This appeal results from a diversity action for damages tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the manufacturer of a failed automobile tire. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. Bruce Steve Baker, the appellant, was injur

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: The opinion issued June 5, 2017 is withdrawn by the panel, and the following is issued in its place: In this appeal, Steve Cuellar Zuniga first challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence ob *279 tained durin

ROBERTS, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This appeal requires this Court to address whether a provision in a property-settlement agreement is alimony subject to termination upon the remarriage of the alimony recipient. Steve Hollis and Myra Hollis Baker were granted a divorce on April 17, 2003, on the ground of adultery. Hollis and Baker entered into a written agreement disposing of the issues of child custody, chi

The opinion of the court was delivered by Rosen, J.; On direct appeal, this court affirmed Lynwood Baker s conviction for first-degree murder but remanded the case for resentencing. Within 1 year of the resentencing hearing, but more than a year after the remand, Baker filed a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The district court appointed counsel, conducted a hearing, an

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MO- ! TION FOR STAY VIOLATION BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION WILLIAM A CLARK, This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the standing General Order of Reference entered in this District. Motions to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G). This

219 P.3d 827 (2009) Lynwood BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Kansas, Appellee. No. 100,501. Court of Appeals of Kansas. November 20, 2009. *828 Elizabeth Seale Cateforis, of Paul E. Wilson Defender Project, University of Kansas School of Law, for appellant. Boyd K. Isherwood, assistant district attorney, Nola Tedesco Foulston

894 N.E.2d 594 (2008) David BAKER, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 85A04-0807-CR-392. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 15, 2008. *595 Craig Persinger, Marion, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Arthur Thaddeus Perry, Deputy Attorney General, Indianap

298 B.R. 815 (2003) In re Janet Mary BAKER Debtor. Homayoun Namvar, Plaintiff, v. Janet Mary Baker, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-10899-BKC-AJC, Adversary No. 02-1217-BKC-AJC-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. June 25, 2003. *816 Stacey F. Soloff, Miami, FL, for trustee. Steve M. Glerum, Ft. Lauderdale, FL

BAKER, Judge. [1] Brian Young, Dave Wells, Steve Richmond, and Tim Corbett (collectively, the Officers) appeal the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint against Henry Davis. The Officers filed a lawsuit against Davis, a government employee, and two governmental agencies for actions he took while a government employee. After the Officers voluntarily dismissed the governm

ACCEPTED 12-17-00001-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/27/20

768 N.E.2d 477 (2002) John L. BAKER, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 02A04-0107-PC-320. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 16, 2002. *478 John L. Baker, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Appellant pro se. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Robin Hodapp-Gillman, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indian

*210¶1 Mary L. Baker appeals the trial court’s decision to deny execution upon one of five contiguous parcels of land belonging to her former husband, Jayhu C. Baker, that he claimed exempt under the homestead act, chapter 6.13 RCW. Ms. Baker appeals, arguing the homestead exemption does not apply to parcels of property not occupied by a judgment debtor. Because Mr. Baker resides on one of the cont

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAVID F. EVANS; COLLIN FINNERTY;  READE SELIGMANN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STEVEN W. CHALMERS; BEVERLY COUNCIL; RONALD HODGE; JEFF LAMB; MICHAEL RIPBERGER; LEE RUSS; PATRICK BAKER, Defendants-Appellants,  No. 11-1436 and CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA; MARK GOTTLIEB; BENJAMIN HIMAN; DAVID ADDISON; MICHAEL NIFONG; LINWOOD WIL

OPINION Opinion by Justice O’NEILL. Appellants Michael Arnold, Janet Arnold, Steve South, as trustee and on behalf of the South Living Trust, John S. Ferris, M.D., Christine Duncan, and all others similarly situated appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Life Partners, Inc., Abundant Income LLC, and Milk

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Jacob Balash and Jonathan Balash, FILED Oct 08 2024, 9:12 am Appellants-Defendants, CLERK Indiana

81 F.3d 172 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Har

WOODARD, Judge. For the reasons found in the companion case rendered this date under the caption number 98-749 Joe Don Touchet, et al. v. Baker Hughes Inc., et al. (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/3/99), 737 So.2d 821, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellants. AFFIRMED.