Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. I This is an appeal by Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., Bache & Co., Inc., Drexel Burn-ham & Co., Inc., Loeb, Roades & Co., Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Inc., Wheat, First Securities Inc., Dean Witter & Co., Inc., E. F. Hutton & Co., Inc., Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes Incorporated, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,

458 F.Supp. 1364 (1978) In the Matter of PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Debtor. In re CONFIRMATION AND CONSUMMATION OF PLAN OF REORGANIZATION. No. 70-347. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. August 17, 1978. *1365 *1366 Charles A. Horsky, Brice Clagett, Washington, D. C., James

458 F.Supp. 1234 (1978) In the Matter of PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Debtor. In re OPINION APPROVING PLAN OF REORGANIZATION. No. 70-347. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. March 9, 1978. Order Approving the Plan March 17, 1978. *1235 *1236

GULOTTA, Judge. This is a suit on a promissory note. From an adverse judgment plaintiff brings this appeal. Plaintiff, Mrs. Nelda Harrison, also known as Mrs. Brenza, was the divorced wife of Stanley W. Alexander, for whom subsequently her Succession was substituted as plaintiff through the testamentary executor of her estate, Eben Hardie, Jr. *189

Murphy, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Davidson, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 463, infra. The issue in this case is whether the common law doctrine of contributory negligence should be judicially abrogated in Maryland and the doctrine of comparative negligence adopted in its place as the rule governing trial of negligenc

A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge When an oil and gas company suspects valuable fossil fuels rest below swaths of land, it leases mineral rights from the people who own that land on the surface. These leases typically allow the company to build wells to capture oil and gas, in exchange for a portion of the profit (a "royalty") payable to the landowners. The Plaintiffs in this case-the landowners-allege that the Defenda

367 F.Supp. 1158 (1973) In re PENN CENTRAL SECURITIES LITIGATION. Byron WILLIAMS et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY et al. M.D.L. Docket No. 56, Civ. A. No. 71-2838. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. November 19, 1973. As Amended December 3, 1973. *1159 *1160 <

MEMORANDUM JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Raymond Farzan brings this employment discrimination action against his former employer, Defendant The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. §§ 951-963, and the Age Discrimination

NUMBER 13-10-00614-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JEAN CONWAY, Appellant, v. DALLAS DURELL AND KELLY SOLIZ, Appellees. On appeal from the 36th District Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge. These cases were argued together, both below and on appeal, and may be disposed of in one opinion. They raise £wo questions. The one which evidently controlled the court’s judgment in dismissing the libels was: Were the supplies which the libellant furnished the steamers reasonable and proper under the circumstances ; or, in other words, were they necessaries ? The Steamers Penn and

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1850 JESUS HUMBERTO ZUNIGA ROMERO, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: May 8, 2019 Decided: August 29, 2019 B

OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge. Intervenor-plaintiffs Lawler and Foster (“plaintiffs”), who have filed a Second Amended Complaint on behalf of all plaintiffs, are shareholders of Great Southwest Corporation (“GSC”).1 Plaintiffs allege that defendants, by virtue of numerous acts and omissions, have violated §§ 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Ac

[Cite as Alomari v. Almajali, 2020-Ohio-4349.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY HAKAM ALOMARI, : Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2019-11-187 : OPINION - vs -

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER Ramos, District Judge: Plaintiff Michael Bright-Asante brings this action against Saks & Company, Inc., the Vice President of Human Resources, Theo Christ (together, “Saks”), and the Retail, Hotel, and Department Store Union/United Food and Commercial Workers International Local 1102 (“Local 1102”) (all together, “Defendants”) alleging, among other things, employment discrimin

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00044-CR

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

79 S.W.3d 141 (2002) Tabitha LATTRELL, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION and Bonham Chrysler, Appellees. No. 06-00-00074-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted October 18, 2001. Decided May 21, 2002. Rehearing Overruled July 16, 2002. *144 Benton Musslewhite, Houston, for appellant.

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

OPINION BY WECHT, J.: Francis X. Murray (“Murray”), pro se, appeals the order entered on March 26, 2012. That order granted summary judgment to JP Morgan Chase Bank (“Appel-lee”) in the foreclosure action against Murray to which it allegedly succeeded as substituted plaintiff.1 The order also awarded Appellee an in rem judgment against Murray in the amount of $

366 B.R. 326 (2007) In re TRI-STATE ARMORED SERVICES, INC., Debtor. Great American Insurance Companies, Inc., Appellee, v. Thomas J. Subranni, Esq., as the trustee of the estate of Tri-State Armored Services, Inc., et al., Appellants. Civ.A. No. 06-2226 (JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 23, 2007. *327