Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James B. Zagel, United States District Judge The instant adversary proceeding was chosen as a “test case” to resolve common legal issues among the Trustee’s actions in the bankruptcy proceedings of Sentinel Managément Group, Inc. (“Sentinel”). In this five-count action, the Trustee seeks to avoid or reduce the transfer of approximately $15.6 million to Defendant FC Stone, LLC

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge These nine cases all arise from the decade-old bankruptcy of Sentinel Management Group, Inc. The facts surrounding Sentinel's collapse have been described in more than a dozen published opinions dating back to 2010. In short, Sentinel's managers failed to segregate client funds and securities in violation of federal law, regulations, and customer agreements. Instead, Sentinel pled

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 54 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA NUVEDA, LLC, No. 82649 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

*937ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 85 HOWARD R. LLOYD, United States Magistrate Judge In February 2014, John Luna brought suit against Shac, LLC, dba Sapphire Gentlemen’s Club, Club Texting, Inc. and Call-Fire, Inc. for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227.

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. The 2007 bankruptcy of Sentinel Management Group, Inc. has echoed through the courts for ten years now. This is our fifth appeal dealing with Sentinel. In a pair of cases decided in 2013 and 2016, we addressed the priority of a claim against the bankruptcy estate by the Bank of New York, Sentinel’s largest (but no longer secured) creditor. In r

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-03-257 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) )

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: HLT Existing Franchise Holding LLC (“HLT”), a subsidiary of Hilton Worldwide, Inc. (“HWI”) (collectively, “Hilton”),1 a franchisor of Hampton Inn hotels, brings suit against its former franchisee, Worcester Hospitality Group LLC (“WHG”) for contract damages arising from Hilton’s decision to terminate the franch

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before this Court is defendant Platinum Equity, LLC's ("Platinum") motion to dismiss (# 13) and memorandum in support (# 14) for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in opposition (# 20), and Platinum has filed a reply in support. (# 24). Finding personal jurisdiction is lacking over Platinum, which cannot be remedied b

ROTHENBERG, J. The plaintiff below, Dinuro Investments, LLC (“Dinuro”), appeals an order dismissing four counts of its complaint against the defendants. The trial court found that Dinuro lacks standing in its individual capacity and should have instead brought the suit derivatively on behalf of the limited liability company (“LLC”). This case presents us with an issue of law manif

MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING MOTION TO SELL SUBSTANTIALLY ALL ASSETS OF DEBTORS John T. Gregg, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the court in connection with a motion to sell substantially all of the Debtors’ assets and assume and assign certain executory contracts and unexpired leases pursuant to sections 363 and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code [Dkt. No. 487] (the “Sale Motion”)

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

USCA11 Case: 20-10779 Date Filed: 06/04/2021 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-10779 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cv-61555-AHS DON’T LOOK MEDIA LLC, a Delaware Limited Liabili

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. The trial court dismissed Katie Lovett’s complaint against Capital Principles, LLC and other defendants on the basis that Lovett failed to file with her complaint the written verifications required by subsection (b) of OCGA § 9-11-11.1, Georgia’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. Lovett contends on appeal that the verifications were not required because the anti-SLAPP

ACCEPTED 03-15-00447-CV 8312763 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 02828) Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 02828 [31 NY3d 1002] April 26, 2018 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</

ACCEPTED 04-15-00117-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

390 B.R. 762 (2008) In re HAVEN ELDERCARE, LLC, et al.[1], Debtors. No. 07-32720(ASD). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut, New Haven Division. July 4, 2008. *764 Alan Eric Gamza, Alan Kolod, Andrew P. Lederman, Christopher Gresh, Mark N. Parry, Philippe A. Zimmerman, Scott E. Silberfein, Mark Nelson Parry, Moses &a;

MEMORANDUM. ***1004**806The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. We conclude that the courts below properly dismissed plaintiff Skanska USA Building In

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Aphena Pharma Solutions-Maryland LLC (“Aphena”) sued BioZone Laboratories, Inc. (“BioZone”), BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BioZone Pharmaceuticals”), and Daniel Fisher (collectively “defendants”) for contract and fraud claims. Pending are Fisher’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and the defendants’ motion to transfer the case t