Cases

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, AtLee and Raphael PUBLISHED Argued at Norfolk, Virginia JOHN F. GLYNN AND KEVIN J. GLYNN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0327-22-1 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS

SNEED, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal from judgments entered against the two defendants for one armed and two unarmed robberies of three Riverside, California banks. Defendant McManamy was convicted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d) on three counts of robbing a federally insured bank. Defendant Jarrad was convicted

Boening v Nassau County Dept. of Assessment (2018 NY Slip Op 00272) Boening v Nassau County Dept. of Assessment 2018 NY Slip Op 00272 Decided on January 17, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New Yo

04/20/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 14, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DARRYL WILKINS BURTON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. II-CR078114 Deanna B. Johnson, Judge ___________________________________

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 22, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVEN GREGG BARKER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 13-CR-258 Amy F. Reedy, Judge _____________________________ No. E2013-02721-CCA-R3-CD-FILED-SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 ___________

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ' GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS- JOHN T. FOWLKES, JR., District Judge. Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claim for Violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Bad Faith Penalties, and Punitive and Trefilé Damages filed on November 27, 2012. (DE #13). Plaintiff filed a re

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 430 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 431 Upon reconsideration, the decision previously filed in this case, Irvine v. Akron Beacon Journal, 9th Dist. Nos. 20450 and 205

170 B.R. 41 (1994) In re Philip PRICHARD, Constance Prichard, Debtors. HERKIMER COUNTY TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Mark SWIMELAR, Esq. in his capacity as the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Trustee of the above named debtors; Randy Schaal, Esq. in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee of the above named debtors, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 92-00529. Adv. No. 94-70003A. United States Bankruptcy Cou

1 A.3d 310 (2010) YUCAIPA AMERICAN ALLIANCE FUND II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and Yucaipa American Alliance (Parallel) Fund II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiffs, v. Leonard RIGGIO, Stephen Riggio, George Campbell Jr., Michael J. Del Giudice, William Dillard, II, Patricia L. Higgins, Irene R. Miller, Margaret T. Monaco, Lawrence S. Zilavy, and Barnes & Noble, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

93 B.R. 313 (1988) In re Laurence Donald BOYER Rosemary Jean Boyer, d/b/a Rosemary's Beauty Shop f/d/b/a Kay's Beauty Salon, Debtors. Lawrence D. BOYER, Debtor and Lawrence D. Boyer, Trustee, Special Appointment Fund on Behalf of Nebraska Annual Conference, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. BALANOFF, Individually and as Bankruptcy Trustee and Richard A. Benjes; Daniel W. Forker, Jr.; Stephen P. Childs; Janice P. Long; Porter K. Brown; Charles M. Chako

642 N.E.2d 553 (1994) UNIVERSAL GROUP Limited; Universal Flavors International, Inc.; Universal Flavor Corporation; Universal Flavors of Indiana, Inc.; Universal Flavors of New Jersey, Inc., Hurty-Peck & Company; Blanke Baer/Bowey Krimko Corporation; and Cock'n Bull, Ltd., Petitioners, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE, Respondent. No. 49T10-9108-TA-00039. Tax Court of Indiana.

782 A.2d 752 (2001) Carla BROWN, as Next Friend of Octavia Brown, Appellant, v. ARGENBRIGHT SECURITY, INC., and Safeway Stores, Inc., Appellees. No. 99-CV-1603. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 24, 2001. Decided October 4, 2001. *754 Gregory L. Lattimer for appellant. David D. Hudgins, w

MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER MUNSON, Senior District Judge. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow below, defendants’ motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND The relevant facts are undisputed. On April 29, 1997, plaintiff Mary Anne Kilmer, a resident of the S

ORDER Timothy C. Batten, Sr., United States District Judge This patent infringement case comes before the Court on Defendant OMsignal, Inc.’s motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and (3) to dismiss the amended complaint or, in the alternative, to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York [21]. As set forth below, the Court concludes that OMsignal is subject to personal jurisdic

625 A.2d 898 (1993) Coleman P. GORHAM v. TOWN OF CAPE ELIZABETH. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued September 16, 1992. Reargued November 3, 1992. Decided March 11, 1993. *899 E. Stephen Murray (orally), Elaine L. Clarke, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, for plaintiff. Michael H. Hill (orally), M

The appellant, The Bowery Savings Bank, a mortgagee of premises presently to be described, challenges procedure by which the City of New York acquired certain real property for the widening of East 135th Street in connection with the construction of the westerly approach to the Triborough Bridge. The condemnation involved easements possessed by the owners of lands, outside the lines of taking, which abut upon the Mott Haven Canal. (SeeMatter of City of New York [Exterior St.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 30, 2015 Session1 Heard at Nashville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CORRIN KATHLEEN REYNOLDS Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Knox County No. 99372 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge No. E2013-02309-SC-R11-CD – Filed November 3, 2016 We granted this app

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This case, now at the summary judgment stage, involves claims that state parole officials, in portions of 2012, 2013, and 2014, unconstitutionally deprived plaintiff *689John Doe (“Doe”) of access to his infant child. Doe earlier had been convicted of sexual offenses against a teenage girl, fo

OPINION OF THE COURT Sandler, J. P. The respondent New York City Loft Board appeals from an order and judgment entered October 2, 1984 by Special Term (Orest V. Maresca, J.), which, inter alia, declared null and void a regulation which in substance exempted from coverage under the Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling Law §§ 280-287) any otherwise eligible loft unit that had been issued a temporary residentia

OPINION OF THE COURT Elliott Wilk, J. This action challenges defendants’ policy and practice of *173denying Home Relief benefits, Medicaid and food stamps1 to destitute homeless people who reside in emergency shelters. It began as a CPLR article 78 proceeding in which McKenzie Thrower sought to overturn respondents’ dec