Cases

— Appeal by the defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lock-man, J.), dated August 29,1990. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Lockman at the Supreme Court. Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

WILLHITE, J. *696Defendant James Roth pleaded no contest to, and was convicted of, second degree burglary ( Pen. Code,1 § 459 ), a felony, based upon his entry into a storage locker with the intent to commit larceny. The trial court imposed sentence, but suspended execution and placed defendant on probation. His pro

PER CURIAM.* While plaintiffs counsel produced evidence showing she was out of town for *375medical reasons for approximately two weeks immediately prior to the expiration of the ninety day period for requesting service, and was in court on the entire day of the deadline, she has not shown any reason why she was prevented from requesting s

In re Young, Sammy; — Plaintiffs; Applying for Rehearing of this Court’s action dated November 9, 2001; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court No. 551— 146, Div. “N”; Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit No. 01-C-187. Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., would grant. KIMBALL, J., would grant. JOHNSON, J., would grant.

In re Roth, Stephen; Jefferson Parish of; Consolidated Waterworks Dist. No. 1 for Jeff. Par.; — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. N, No. 551-146; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. Ol-C-187. Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeal for opinion. CIACCIO, J., recused.

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Respondent Ellen M. Carlstein Roth was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on December 22, 1969. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent was in-house counsel for Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. (Siemens), a business with its principal location in New Jersey. On February 27, 2007, respondent pleaded guilty

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-97-00439-CV Marilyn Roth, Appellant v. Michael Stephen Williams, Appellee

651 F.3d 367 (2011) David ROTH; Betsy Roth, Appellants v. NORFALCO LLC. No. 10-2524. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued March 24, 2011. Filed: June 28, 2011. *369 Albert J. Evans (argued), Riley & Fanelli P.C., Pottsville, PA, for Appellant. *370

932 A.2d 1071 (2007) 104 Conn.App. 248 STATE of Connecticut v. Peg E. ROTH. No. 27517. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 7, 2007. Decided October 23, 2007. *1072 James D. Diamond, Ridgefield, for the appellant (defendant). Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state's attorney

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. These appeals challenge a sanction award against counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, as well as a fee award against two individual plaintiffs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Both appeals arise out of the same ill-fated § 1983 action. Plaintiffs Stephen Roth and Ellen Gumeson, represented by a

85 P.3d 571 (2003) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Corbin ROTH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02CA0160. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. August 14, 2003. Certiorari Denied March 8, 2004. *572 Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Elizabeth Rohrbough, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, C

838 N.E.2d 347 (2005) 361 Ill. App.3d 1047 297 Ill.Dec. 860 Terry STEPHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Virginia Rose HUCKABA, as Independent Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Powers, Jr., Deceased, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Estate of Robert Powers, Jr., a/k/a Robert Junior Powers, Deceased. No. 4-05-0073. Appellat

326 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2003) Stephen and Jean ROTH, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 02-44-M-LBE. United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division. December 12, 2003. *1164 Ward A. Shanahan, Gough Shanahan Johnson & Waterman, Helena, Mt, S. Amanda Koehler, Mountain States Legal

777 N.E.2d 499 (2002) 334 Ill. App.3d 259 267 Ill.Dec. 696 D. Stephen GUERRANT and Marcia Guerrant, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robert ROTH, Vincent and Roth, P.C., an Illinois Corporation; and McCoy Real Estate Services, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Defendants (D'Ancona & Pflaum, L.L.C., Appellant). No. 1-01-3690. Appellate Court of Illinois, First Di

We consider on direct appellate review two orders issued in a Superior Court action brought by Suzanne Roth against Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (Arnica), her automobile insurer. We affirm both orders, and affirm judgment for Arnica. Background. Arnica issued Roth a standard Massachusetts automobile policy, sixth edition (standard policy), including optional collision coverage (part seven), to insure her 1993 Acura Legend

OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellants Stephen, Leann, David, and Christine Ouwinga and their company, Stoney Creek Fisheries and Equipment, Inc., (the “Ouwingas”) appeal the dismissal of their Complaint against various Defendant-Appellees related to a purported tax-deductible welfare benefit plan — the Benistar 419 Plan (“Benistar

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to decide whether a public school district’s failure to designate a struggling student as disabled violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ MOO-1419, or § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794. In making this determination, we delineate

*621MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS URBOM, Senior District Judge. On January 7, 1994, United States Magistrate Judge David L. Piester recommended that the defendant’s motion to suppress be granted. The government has objected. The basis of the recommendation was that

24-950 Roth v. Armistice Capital, LLC In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2024 No. 24-950 ANDREW E. ROTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARMISTICE CAPITAL, LLC, ARMISTICE CAPITAL M

Associates First Capital Corp. v Roth (2024 NY Slip Op 01789) Associates First Capital Corp. v Roth 2024 NY Slip Op 01789 Decided on April 3, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua