Cases

OPINION Opinion By Justice MORRIS. In this appeal following a trial to the court without a jury, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. challenges the trial court’s judgment in favor of Ray Robinson on his claims for wrongful foreclosure and breach of contract. In three issues, Wells Fargo contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient

MEMORANDUM BLAKE, District Judge. On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This antitrust case'arises from allegations that Defendants fixed the prices of *862cathode ray tubes (“CRTs”), which were common components of television sets and computer moni

738 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2010) In re CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This document relates to All Actions. Master File No. CV-07-5944 SC. MDL No. 1917. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 30, 2010. *1013 Gilmur Roderick Murray, Murray & Howard, LLP, Geoffrey Conrad Rushing, Richard Alexander Saveri, Giann

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 601 U. S. Part 1 Pages 23–41 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 8, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

830 P.2d 236 (1992) Monte C. HANSEN, Linda Hansen, Monte T. Hansen, Duane Jess Humphries, Carol Ravarino, and Richard Ravarino, Plaintiffs, v. SEA RAY BOATS, INC., an Arizona corporation, Southwest Marine, an Arizona corporation, Professional Mariner, a California corporation, and Newmark Products, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants. No. 900512. Supreme Court of Utah. M

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge *451Petitioner John Henry Ray is serving a life sentence for first-degree murder. He alleged in his habeas corpus petition, among many other things, that his Sixth Amendment rights were abridged when his lawyer was excluded from a critical stage of his state prosecution. His habeas corpus case returns to this Court following

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS JOEY AUSTIN, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner March 21, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF AP

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 18, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00148-CR JOHNNY RAY RYDER, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 41912 IRWIN RYAN RAY ADAMS, ) ) Boise, December 2014 Term Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) 2015 Opinion No. 32 v.

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. DOWDELL, District Judge. I. Background Plaintiff, as Guardian of Charles Ray (Ray), who is alleged to be an incapacitated person, brings this lawsuit against the defendants for injuries suffered from a severe assault on Mr. Ray at the David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center (the Jail). The following summarizes facts that are alleged in plaintiffs

594 F.3d 419 (2010) Wesley MURRAY; Kelly Renee Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.; Fidelity National Title Group; Chicago Title Insurance Company; Ticor Title Insurance Company; Chicago Title Insurance Group; Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-50157. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 15,

OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-Appellant Roger Murray (Roger) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus challenging the death sentence imposed following his convictions for murder and armed robbery. I. BACKGROUND 1

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00242-CV Guillermo Ochoa-Cronfel, Appellant v. Patrick C. Murray, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-11-002136, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

OPINION THOMPSON, Judge. ¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court's decision vacating Stephen H.’s commitment to the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center (ACPTC) under Arizona’s Sexually Violent Persons (SVP) Act, Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) sections 36-3701 to -3717 (2002). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand to the trial court for reinstatement of the commitment.

982 A.2d 764 (2009) Michael Patrick MURRAY, et al., Appellants, v. MOTOROLA, INC., et al., Appellees. Nos. 07-CV-1074, 07-CV-1075, 07-CV-1076, 07-CV-1077, 07-CV-1078, 07-CV-1079. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 23, 2009. Decided October 29, 2009. As Amended on Rehearing December 10, 2009.

GREGORY, Chief Judge: Appellant Leonard Charles Bernard was found guilty of one count of possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime

599 S.E.2d 346 (2004) 267 Ga.App. 417 WHITEN v. MURRAY et al. No. A04A0655. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 14, 2004. *348 McClure, Ramsay, Dickerson & Escoe, Bambi N. Carswell, Toccoa, for appellant. Smith & Tabor, Donald C. Tabor, Taccoa, Jeffery S. Malcom, for appellees. BLACKBURN

ACCEPTED 03-15-00242-CV 7830504 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Opinion issued June 19, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00628-CV ——————————— CARL RAY MARBURGER, Appellant V. LESLIE RENE GUEST A/K/A LESLIE RENEE GUEST AND WALTER