Cases

31 S.W.3d 911 (2000) Kevin OSBORNE, Appellant, v. Charles Anthony PAYNE and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Owensboro, Ky., Appellees. and Charles Anthony Payne, Appellant, v. Kevin Osborne and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Owensboro, Ky., Appellees. Nos. 1999-SC-0616-DG, 1999-SC-0621-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 22, 2000.

TACHA, Circuit Judge. I. Background This case involves the determination of the heirs of Abbie Effie Little Eagle Osborne, a full-blood Pawnee Indian who died intestate. At the time of her death, Ms. Osborne owned allotted lands held in trust by the United States. See 25 U.S.C. §§ 331-358. Pursuant to its authority under 25 U.S.C. § 372, the Department of Interior (DOI) conduc

LAMBERT, Justice. This Court granted appellant’s motion for discretionary review of the Court of Appeals opinion affirming the trial court’s order forfeiting currency and a motor vehicle pursuant to KRS 218A.410. Appellant does not challenge the forfeiture on grounds that allocation of burden of proof or any aspect of the statute is constitutionally infirm. Therefore, our inquiry will be limited to a proper construction of t

549 S.E.2d 840 (2001) 353 N.C. 696 Robert BACON, Richard Cagle, and Elton McLaughlin v. R.C. LEE, Warden of Central Prison, Michael F. Easley, Governor of North Carolina, & Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina. No. 209A91-4. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 2, 2001. *843 Thomas F. Lofl

304 Md. 323 (1985) 499 A.2d 170 KENNETH LEE OSBORNE v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 69, September Term, 1985. Court of Appeals of Maryland. October 23, 1985. Gary S. Offutt, Asst. Public Defender, Baltimore (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, Baltimore, on brief), for appellant. Diane G. Goldsmith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, (Stephen H. Sac

OPINION OF THE COURT This is an appeal of the Court of Appeals’ denial of John David Lee’s petition *31for a writ of mandamus or prohibition.1 The underlying case is a divorce action. In his "writ petition, Appellant asked that the trial judge be required to disqualify himself from further involvement in the case because of his bias against Appellant.

04/03/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 19, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEE ALAN SPRAGUE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Roane County No. 2012-CR-170 Michael Pemberton, Judge No. E20

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2021-3898 _____________________________ SAMUEL A. OSBORNE, Appellant, v. WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and SANDESTIN INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Jeffrey E. Lewis, J

ACCEPTED 01-15-01009-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/1/2015 9:41:50 AM 01-15-01009-CV

166 F.Supp.2d 479 (2001) Gorman Dale OSBORNE, Administrator of the Estate of Sammy Hubbard, Lynn Hubbard, individually and Lynn Hubbard as guardian and next of kin for Katie Hubbard and Seth Hubbard, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 2:99-0759. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. August 23, 2001. <

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. The government appeals from orders of the district court releasing from custody defendants Stephen Traitz, Jr., Mark Osborn, and Robert Medina on certain conditions of release imposed by the court. The government contends that the release conditions are unsatisf

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge DUNCAN joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: In 2000, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging Samuel Stephen Ealy with one count of conspiracy to murder while working in furtherance of a continuing cr

548 S.E.2d 740 (2001) 353 N.C. 522 Robert BACON, Elton McLaughlin and Richard Eugene Cagle, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. R.C. LEE, Warden, North Carolina Central Prison; Michael F. Easley, Governor of North Carolina; and Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina, Defendants. No. 209A91-4. Supreme Court of North Carolina.<

56 P.3d 950 (2002) 184 Or.App. 556 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Lee STEPHENS, Jr., Appellant. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Lee Stephens, Jr., Appellant. 99CR-0811, 99CR-1013; A109960 (Control), A109961; 99-4865FE; A110305 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 27, 2002. Decided October 30,

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ROBBIE JAMES LYONS,  Petitioner-Appellant, v.  No. 02-13 R. C. LEE, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.  ROBBIE JAMES LYONS,  Petitioner-Appellant, v.

203 F.Supp.2d 512 (2002) Robbie James LYONS, Petitioner, v. R.C. LEE, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent. No. 1:00CV00108. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 26, 2002. *513 *514 *515

739 N.W.2d 855 (2007) Stephen GRAY and Shelly Gray, Husband and Wife, Appellants v. James R. OSBORN, III, Appellee, Tamra Randall, Intervenor-Appellee. Tamra Randall, Appellee v. Stephen Gray and Shelly Gray, Appellants, Joan K. Peck and Marjorie A. Thirkettle, Intervenors-Appellees. No. 05-1850. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 5, 2007.

Quinn-Brintnall, C.J. The parents of Jennie Mae Osborn, a 15-year-old high school student who was raped and murdered by level III sex offender Joseph Rosenow, sued Mason County for failing to properly notify the community of the danger that Rosenow presented. The County appeals the trial court’s denial of its summary judgment motion, contending that the sex offender notification statute then in effect authorized, but did not req

267 S.W.3d 531 (2008) CHRISTUS HEALTH SOUTHEAST TEXAS d/b/a Christus St. Mary Hospital, Dubuis Health System, Inc. d/b/a Dubuis Hospital of Port Arthur, and Sreedhar Polavarapu, Appellants, v. Preston BROUSSARD, Individually and a/n/f of Dorothy Broussard, Deceased and a/n/f of Cody Broussard, Appellee. No. 09-08-044CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted June 26, 20

PER CURIAM. A detailed discussion of the facts of this case and the regulatory scheme at issue is set forth in Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd., 376 F.3d 118, 121-25 (2d Cir.2004) (“Coke I”). The procedural history is this: Plaintiff-Appellant Evelyn Coke appealed from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the