Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stephen Edward Pascoe”
Carrie Sama v. Edward Hanniganpublic domain
OWEN, Circuit Judge: Carrie Rahat Sama, who was incarcerated in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division (TDCJ-CID), sought damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She asserted that her constitutional rights were violated when her ovary and lymph nodes were removed without her consent during a radical hysterectomy. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the physicians
939 P.2d 464 (1997) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIXED BASE OPERATORS, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Eagle County Air Terminal Corporation and James Ronald Fritze, in his Official Capacity as County Attorney of Eagle County, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. No. 96CA1042. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.</
POPE, Circuit Judge. This was an action under the Oregon Wrongful Death Act, brought in the court below by reason of the diversity of citizenship of the parties. The defendants, appellants here, were charged with having caused the death of Edward S. Remillard, the plaintiff’s decedent, through the negligent operation of a tractor at a place near The Dalles, Oregon. Edward S. Rem
Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal & Professional Publications, Inc.public domain
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff in this antitrust action is Mul-tistate Legal Studies, Inc. (“PMBR”), a commercial provider of bar examination preparation to would-be lawyers in Colorado and elsewhere. PMBR claims that anticompeti-tive actions by two other providers of bar review courses, defendants Harcourt Brace Jovanovieh Legal and Professional Publications, Inc. (“H
State v. Sibertpublic domain
Alexander, J. ¶29 (dissenting) — I dissent because, in my view, it was error for the trial court to (1) omit the identity of the controlled substance in the “to convict” jury instructions and (2) impose a sentence that was not authorized by the jury’s verdict. As the harmless error doctrine does not apply to the second error, I would vacate Richard Sibert’s sentence and remand for resentencing. The Instruct
Dibbs v. Hillsborough Countypublic domain
ORDER CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties in this matter. Plaintiff Stephen J. Dibbs (“Dibbs” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts I and II (“Dibbs’ Motion”)' (Doc. 35) and Defendant Hillsborough County, Florida (“the County” or “Defendant”) filed a Motion for Su
Grossman v. Statepublic domain
29 So.3d 1034 (2010) Martin Edward GROSSMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC10-118. Supreme Court of Florida. February 8, 2010. *1035 Bill Jennings, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, and Richard E. Kiley, James Viggiano, and Andrew Ali Shakoor, Assistant CCR Counsel, Middle Region, Tampa, FL, for Appellant.
State v. Iniguezpublic domain
217 P.3d 768 (2009) STATE of Washington, Petitioner, v. Ricardo INIGUEZ, Respondent. No. 81750-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 7, 2009. Decided October 8, 2009. *769 Frank William Jenny, II, Franklin County Prosecutor's Office, Pasco, WA, for Petitioner. James Edward Egan, James E. Egan
Matissek v. Wallerpublic domain
51 So.3d 625 (2011) Joseph Gerhard MATISSEK and Kelly Beth Matissek, Appellants, v. Roland D. WALLER, Appellee. No. 2D09-2250. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 14, 2011. Edward B. Cole of Cole Law Firm, P.A., Dunedin; and Shelly M. Johnson of Shelly *626 M. Johnson, P.A., New Port Richey, for Appellan
State v. Kirwinpublic domain
Fairhurst, J. ¶1 —A jury convicted Dennis Ray Kirwin of unlawful possession of methamphetamine. The police found the methamphetamine in Kirwin’s truck during a warrant-less search conducted incident to the arrest of the passenger, Casey Irwin. Kirwin claims the State failed to justify the warrantless search of his truck under the search *822incident to arrest exception. H
David Donovan v. Brian Vancepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli
State v. Eisfeldtpublic domain
11 On August 5, 2003, a repairman saw what he believed to be the remains of a marijuana growing *632operation in a Lacey house and called the police. When the police arrived the repairman let them into the house to show them what he had seen. The police then sought, and were granted, a telephonic warrant to search the rest of the house. In the course of the search and subsequent i
Barriga Figueroa v. Prieto Mariscalpublic domain
González, J ¶ 1 Washington law extends work product protection to statements made by an insured to an insurer following an accident in light of the specific parties involved and the expectations of those parties. We must decide if that protection applies here, where the insured has gained the status of insured by statute, rather than by contract. We hold it does. We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the
Chavez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. at Pascopublic domain
FAIRHURST, C.J. *227 *511 ¶ 1 Judith Q. Chavez, Kathleen Christianson, Oralia Garcia, Marrietta Jones, and other registered nurses (nurses) sought class certification in their wage action again
Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. Fednav Ltd.public domain
915 F.Supp. 218 (1995) CROWLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDNAV LTD., et al., Defendants. No. CS-94-178-JLQ. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. December 11, 1995. *219 Rodney L. Brown, Jr., Gillis E. Reavis, Peter J. Gutierrez, Beverlee E. Silva, Morrison & Foerster, Seattle, WA, for Crowley Ma
Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to decide whether § 510 of the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1140, applies to rehiring decisions. Plaintiffs are former employees of defendant Mack Trucks, Inc., who lost their jobs when Mack closed its Allentown plant in 1987. Some plaintiffs had vested pension rights at the time they were laid off. Others merely h
Larry Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc.public domain
281 F.3d 372 Larry BECKER; Stephen Capkovic, III; Lee R. Christ; James Daquisto; Michael Dreher; Randy Frey; Robert Gaston; Charles Grohotolski; Barry Jones; John Judd; Dennis Knopf, Wayne Labaty; William Lehman; Thomas Litchauer; Bruce McFarland; Michael Meyers; Samuel Oliveria;Robert Peters; Sherwood Peters; Thomas Roberts; Katherine Takacs; Scott Takacs; Anthony Tratnyek; Claire Williams; Dennis C. Acker; Richard Balliet; Alexander Bandi, Jr
Avalos v. Bacapublic domain
517 F.Supp.2d 1156 (2007) J. AVALOS, individually and as a representative of the class defined hereinbelow, Plaintiff, v. Leroy BACA, Larry Waldie, Shaun Mathers, Defendants. No. CV 05-07602 DDP SHX. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 24, 2007. *1157 *1158
In Re Eagle Enterprises, Inc.public domain
237 B.R. 269 (1999) In the Matter of EAGLE ENTERPRISES, INC., and Liberty Recovery Systems, Inc. CIV. A. No. 98-4749. Bankruptcy Nos. 98-11297, 98-11298. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Division. August 16, 1999. *270 Mark E. Felger, Cozen and O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for appellee. Stephen M. Calde
City of Seattle v. Holifieldpublic domain
240 P.3d 1162 (2010) CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. The Honorable George W. HOLIFIELD, Seattle Municipal Court, Defendant, Matthew Jacob, Petitioner, John Wright, Jacob Culley, Defendants. No. 83277-3. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued June 10, 2010. Decided October 14, 2010. *1163 Andrew R. E