⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Stephen Beam”

District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 922 F. Supp. 2d 1338; 2013 WL 504864; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18085
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. Based on an advertisement representing the mileage of a 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle to be 56,537 miles, Plaintiff Stephen Beam purchased the advertised vehicle from Defendant Domani Motor Cars, Inc. Shortly after procuring the car, however, Beam realized that the odometer was stuck at 56,537 miles and attempted to return t
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 510 B.R. 399; 2014 WL 2006587
ORDER W. HOMER DRAKE, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the Debtors’ Motion to Strip the Second Mortgage held by Chase Home Finance, LLC as unsecured (hereinafter the “Motion to Strip”), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 506(a) & (d), 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2), and Fed. R. BankR.P. 3012 and 9014. The Debtors also filed a Motion to Compel the Chapter 13 Trustee (hereinafter the “Motion to Compel”) t
Beam v. WSIpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020-07-22 · Published · cited 7× · 2020 ND 168
Filed 07/22/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 168 Gregory Beam, Appellee v. North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance Fund, Appellant and Gagnon, Inc., Respondent No. 20200067 Appeal
Beam v. Kerleepublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995-09-19 · Published · cited 21× · 461 S.E.2d 911; 120 N.C. App. 203; 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 742
461 S.E.2d 911 (1995) Louise T. BEAM and Thomas Andrew Carl Hall, Trustee for William Carl Hall and wife, Helen Lee Hall, Plaintiffs, v. David Franklin KERLEE, Defendant. No. COA94-1123. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 19, 1995. *914 Carnes, Franklin & Evans, P.A. by Everette C. Carnes, Marion, for plaintiff-app
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 144 F. Supp. 2d 464; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11965; 2001 WL 648977
144 F.Supp.2d 464 (2001) BEAM LASER SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CableRep, Inc., CoxCom, Inc., and Sea-Change International, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:00CV195. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. April 20, 2001. *465 Raymond Henry Joseph Powell, Jr., Steven Eugene Adkins, Adduci,
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001-06-01 · Published · cited 2× · 144 F. Supp. 2d 475; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11957; 2001 WL 648980
144 F.Supp.2d 475 (2001) BEAM LASER SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CableRep, Inc., CoxCom, Inc., and SeaChange International, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:00CV195. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. June 1, 2001. *476 *477
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-12-16 · Published · cited 10× · 392 F.3d 294
HEANEY, Circuit Judge. In this consolidated appeal, Patrick T. Manion, Jr., challenges the district court’s 1 order confirming an arbitration award in favor of the Boat Dealers’ Alliance, Inc. (BDA), and Patrick and Nancy Manion contest the district court’s order
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000-09-26 · Published · cited 13× · 156 F. Supp. 2d 552; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21538; 2000 WL 33399962
156 F.Supp.2d 552 (2000) ION BEAM APPLICATIONS S.A., Griffith Micro Science International, Inc., Radiation Dynamics, Inc., and Sterigenics International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. The TITAN CORPORATION, and Titan Scan Corporation, Defendants. No. 2:00CV14. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. September 26, 2000. Conrad Moss Shumadine, Willcox &a;
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000-10-23 · Published · cited 19× · 117 F. Supp. 2d 515; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15855; 2000 WL 1597559
117 F.Supp.2d 515 (2000) BEAM LASER SYSTEMS, INC., Frank L. Beam, Plaintiffs, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Cablerep, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Seachange International, Inc., Defendants. No. 200CV195. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. October 23, 2000. *516 Raymond H.J. Powell, Jr., Steven Eugene Adkins,
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 394 F.3d 1062; 2005 WL 66346
HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Patrick T. Manion, Jr., sued attorney Stephen E. Nagin, and the law firms of *1065 Herzfeld & Rubin, Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., and Nagin Gallop Figueredo, P.A., for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and tortious interference with contract stemming from Nagin’s con
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-01-20 · Published · cited 52× · 354 F.3d 1134; 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 959; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 755; 2004 WL 77891
OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Stephen Nardi (Nardi) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on statute of limitations grounds. Nardi obtained a Certificate of Appealability (COA) limited to whether he had demonstrated an impediment to timely filing his petition o
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-03-29 · Published · cited 13× · 207 F.3d 1036; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5452; 2000 WL 325921
KYLE, District Judge. Appellant James Stephen Hyatt (“Hyatt”) was arrested in September 1997 in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, after a confidential informant identified Hyatt as a distributor of methamphetamine, or “crank.” At the time of Hyatt’s arrest, he was in the process of injecting himself with a substance he identified as “meth” to a police officer. See Transcri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996-09-13 · Published · cited 15× · 91 F.3d 1101; 1996 WL 431126
HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Stephen Edwards appeals his convictions for aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine and for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Edwards argues that the district court erred in admitting evidence that police had seized from his residence prior to his arrest. Edwards also challenges his 96-month sentence. He ar
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-02-08 · Published · cited 33× · 203 F.3d 538; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1646; 2000 WL 136993
203 F.3d 538 (8th Cir. 2000) Stephen K. Johns, Appellant,v.Michael Bowersox, Superintendent of Potosi Correctional Center, Appellee. No. 97-1637 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Submitted: April 19, 1999Filed: February 8, 2000 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Di
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991-02-04 · Published · cited 3× · 925 F.2d 239; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1530; 1991 WL 10257
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Stephen Dale Goode appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). On appeal, Goode argues only that trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective in failing to unearth and call at trial a witness whose existence has never been established and the substance of whose testimo
Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990-09-27 · Published · cited 0× · 798 S.W.2d 134; 1990 Ky. LEXIS 89; 1990 WL 139432
WINTERSHEIMER, Justice, dissenting. I must respectfully dissent because the Board of Tax Appeals correctly interpreted the phrase “cost of production shall be computed on the basis of plant facilities which shall mean all permanent structures affixed to the realty at one location” pursuant to K.R.S. 139.480(3). The assessment of sales and use tax on energy purchased by Beam for use at the Clermont location was c
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2023-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 TN WC 7
FILED Feb 17, 2023 08:19 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016-04-29 · Published · cited 3× · 2016 VT 49; 202 Vt. 51; 147 A.3d 88; 2016 WL 1729578; 2016 Vt. LEXIS 47
Reiber, C.J. ¶ 1. In this driving under the influence (DUI) case, the State appeals the granting of defendant’s motion to exclude evidence collected from a traffic violation stop of his car. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the case because it concluded that the trooper who conducted the stop did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that defendant committed
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974-04-03 · Published · cited 8× · 227 Pa. Super. 293; 324 A.2d 549; 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2059
227 Pa. Superior Ct. 293 (1974) Commonwealth v. Beam, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 18, 1973. April 3, 1974. *294 Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, and SPAETH, JJ. (SPAULDING, J., absent). Carmen P. Belefonte, with him Garland D. Cherry, and Kassab, Cherr
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-07-14 · Published · cited 23× · 964 F.3d 1329
Case: 18-12950 Date Filed: 07/14/2020 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-12950 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00106-SDM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,