Cases

LAGESEN, P.J. *466This is a case involving the application of covenants, codes, and restrictions (CC & Rs) to a Salem subdivision that was developed in two phases. At issue is whether *977those CC & Rs, which provide that "[t]his is a single family

MEMORANDUM DECISION McHUGH, Presiding Judge: T1 Stephanie Reynolds appeals from the trial court's dismissal of her complaints against James H. Woodall, Citibank Federal Savings Bank (Citibank), and U.S. Bank, N.A. (U.S. Bank). She also appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the Corlene Kemker Trust (the Kemker Trust). We affirm.

PER CURIAM: John Reynolds appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Stouffer, No. 8:13-cv-00824-DKC, 2014 WL 576299 (D.Md. Feb. 1

Spain, J. Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 1, 2008, which ruled that the employer is entitled to reimbursement for certain benefits paid to *1098claimant, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed December 30, 2008, which denied the application of the employer and its third-party administrator for full Board review.

360 S.W.3d 332 (2012) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Angelina REYNOLDS, Appellant. No. WD 73306. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 6, 2012. *333 LaDarron D. Williams, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Wesley M. Rogers and Stephanie N. Steele, Liberty, MO, for respondent. Before Division One: CYNTHI

254 S.W.3d 264 (2008) Stephanie REYNOLDS, Florence Streeter, Jacqueline Gray, and the Metropolitan St. Louis Equal Housing Opportunity Council, Inc., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, James Zhang, Intervenor, v. CITY OF VALLEY PARK, Jeffrey Whitteaker, John Brust, Daniel Adams, Randy Helton, Don Carroll, Michael Pennise, Ed Walker, Steve Jake, and J. Michael White, Appellants. No. ED 89659. Missouri Co

EDWARDS, J. In this Engle1 -progeny case, Appellant, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("Reynolds"), argues that Appellee, James Lewis, only surpassed the proposal for settlement threshold entitling him to an award of attorney's fees because the trial court improperly included costs related to four non-testifying expert witnesses retained by Lewis. We agree that was error. Reynolds also correctly as

SERCOMBE, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for, among other offenses, two counts of assault in the third degree, ORS IfiS-lfiSllXe).1 She raises several assignments of error, none of which are preserved. We write only to address her first assignment of error and reject the others without discussion. In her first assignment, defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to ente

EDWARDS, J. In this Engle1 -progeny case, Appellant, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("Reynolds"), argues that Appellee, James Lewis, only surpassed the proposal for settlement threshold entitling him to an award of attorney's fees because the trial court improperly included costs related to four non-testifying expert witnesses retained by Lewis. We agree that was error. Reynolds also correctly as

Per Curiam. Because the circuit court's September 28, 2018, "Order Denying Defendant's renewed Motion for a Directed Verdict or Alternatively for a New Trial," was final, the notice of appeal filed on November 28, 2018, was untimely. Accordingly, this is appeal is dismissed. Appellant may seek relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. Bilbrey, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam. Because the circuit court's September 28, 2018, "Order Denying Defendant's renewed Motion for a Directed Verdict or Alternatively for a New Trial," was final, the notice of appeal filed on November 28, 2018, was untimely. Accordingly, this is appeal is dismissed. Appellant may seek relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. Bilbrey, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

WILLIAM G. YOUNG1 , DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's Motion to Review Taxation of Costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (Doc. 278), as well as Plaintiff James L. Smith's "Renewed Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs" (Doc. 285). Plaintiff

BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Upon consideration of the Appellants’ motion for a written opinion/citation filed on May 24, 2017, and the motion for leave to file a reply in support of their motion for a written opinion/citation filed June 7, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that the Appellants’ motion for a written opinion is granted. The decision dated May 12, 2017, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted therefor. Appel

Gross, J. Donna Fanali, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Cavalier, appeals the trial court order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in a wrongful death action brought by a smoker’s survivors. We affirm because the smoker knew of his tobacco related illnesses in 1989, so he was not a member of the class certified in Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 200

607 F.Supp.2d 911 (2009) Adrian Garcia RANGEL and Janelle Allane Rangel, Plaintiffs, v. Chris REYNOLDS, et al., Defendants. No. 4:07-cv-20-AS-APR. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division, at Lafayette. April 9, 2009. *916 Adrian Garcia Rangel, Chicago, IL, pro se. Janell Allane Rangel, Fremont, MI, pro

Per Curiam. Affirmed. Taylor, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. This matter is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court following its decision in Sojfer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla.2016). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court’s directive, we remand this case for further proceedings on the issue of whether punitive damages should be imposed for Appellee/Cross-App

BENTON, J. Defendants in a wrongful death action below, the tobacco companies who are now appealing, refused Erskin Ward’s offers of judgment, only to lose at trial and suffer entry of judgment in the wrongful death case awarding sums dramatically in excess of what Mr. Ward had been willing to settle for. As the prevailing party, he filed a timely motion to tax attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the offer of judgment statut

PER CURIAM. In this Engle progeny case,1 Appellant, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, appeals a Final Judgment entered in favor of Ap-pellee, Gloria Clayton, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of David Clayton. Appellant argues in part that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Appellee certain taxable costs. We agree with Appellant as to the $3,150 in fees paid to Dr.

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1320This is an "Engle -progeny"1 lawsuit by Plaintiff Patricia Harris ("Plaintiff'), as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gerald Harris ("Mr. Harris"), against three cigarette manufacturers, Philip Morris USA, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco C